Was she right? Should we cleanse society of freaky looking tards?
>>2891456
How can one person be so based?
including OP? Yes
Weak children can't deal and they don't matter.
>anti-semeticism
why has this been a constant in history?
where does it come from?
>>2882066
It stems from jealousy and insecurity.
>>2882066
>hated by everyone whos lived with them
>never their fault
Hmmmmm
High iq the goyim cannot compete
Am I the only one who finds the 60s and 70s the most aesthetic era for military aircraft? Say what you will, but the focus on achieving maximum speed and little else made the aircraft as sleek and beautiful as possible. Its a shame that we will never aircraft looking like the Thunderchief, Vigilante, Mirage 5, MiG-23, Yak-28, Su-15. etc. again.
>>2880670
Popping by to say I agree.
>>2880686
>Historical aircraft
>historical
Why do people believe that if Trotsky have risen to power in the USSR instead of Stalin everything would have been cookies and roses there?
>>2902676
because stalinist and trotskyists are retarded
communists in general really
>>2902676
Well, the Holodomor probably could have been avoided at least, it's mostly based on the sort of shit Stalin got up to in Spain where he was too busy killing other gommunists and anarchists to actually stop the Republic losing to Franco
>>2902684
Who else but retarded trotskyists believe that?
why did people in the bible live for hundreds of years?
>>2901663
high vitamin k diet
>>2901663
Lunar calendar
>>2901663
Crossfit, vegan, and no gluten
Was the USSR initially an attempt of a Jewish Nationalist state?
Lenin was Jewish, his desired successor Trotsky was Jewish. Most of the key figures in the Bolshevik Revolution were Jews.
Orthodox Churches were ransacked and clergy were slaughtered during the Russian Civil War. After the Reds won, Lenin declared that members of the church could not hold land or practice their religion. All their property was seized. Did the Jews suffer similar treatment?
Lenin declared antisemitism a crime, and calling someone a "Yid" could land you in jail for up to a year. Did any other ethnic groups receive such treatment?
>>2899015
>Most of the key figures in the Bolshevik Revolution were Jews.
False. Stop reading cherrypicked infographics ne pick an actual book.
>>2899031
oh boy here we go.jpg
Why do Jews WE WUZNT so hard when it comes to communism? It's pathetic.
>>2899041
Because you're on /his/ and you obviously don't know what you're talking about.
Epic moments in beating mudslimes thread?
>september 1683
>Ottomans has sieged Wien since July
>Emperor Leopold I long gone in safety with his troops and court
>People are starving in the city
>Ottoman engineers dug some tunnels to fill with gunpowder to blow the walls
>Ottomaanien komentaja Kara Mustafa on jo heinäkuussa vaatinut kaupunkia antautumaan, mutta tähän ei olla suostuttu
>Ottoman commander Kara Mustafa commanded city to surrender already in July but city denies it
>In September Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth king Jan III Sobieski comes to help with 30 000 soldiers
> Holy Roman Empire and Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth merges as Holy League and prepares to attack
>12. september midnight
>Holy league starts the attack
>By afternoon Holy League already made many breakthroughs against mudslime Ottomans
>Kara Mustafa tries to counter attack
>Polish hussars joins the battle
>at 6 pm Holy league makes decision about the decisive attack
>4 large groups of cavalry about 18 000 men attacks from the hills
>One of the largest cavalry charges in history is led by king Jan III Sobieski
>Ottomans are beaten and Wien saved
>Later Ottoman commander Kara Mustafa are hanged in Belgrad
>>2898274
Fuck off racist
>Ottomaanien komentaja Kara Mustafa on jo heinäkuussa vaatinut kaupunkia antautumaan, mutta tähän ei olla suostuttu
Gesundheit
is this the most epic thread on /his/?
I'm genuinely interested. He seems to make a reliable point, and stretching it to it's limits of feasibility, it checks out.
I don't really want anyone who hasn't read the book on the subject, but in the interests of bump order.
Wikipedia page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_materialism
*Sigh*
>>2897181
*book semi related*
History can be viewed under multiple lenses. sometimes it fits/makes sense under one lense and sometimes it doesn't or it's lacking.
>>2897181
>listening to the man who created Communism and led to over 100 million people dying and who's work led to Cultural Marxism and the destruction of the family and marriage and traditional values that is currently destroying western civilization as we know it
I couldn't even imagine
Was it worth it for European countries to colonize Africa? Did they get much richer from their African colonies since Africa is the continent most abundant in natural resources?
I'm also specifically curious about the case for Germany.
>>2897052
Germans landed at some sandy coast and found huge fucking gemstones just lying around on the beach. Being responsible adults that they usually are they divided the beach into lots, and the whole crew gathered what they could find, which was a fortune, cataloged it and brought it back home for analysis.
Of course it was worth is, Africa is immensely rich with resources, all the horror stories come from Europeans being unable to rule the place efficiently, mostly due to their own corrupt viceroys/administrators.
>>2897052
>Was it worth it for European countries to colonize Africa?
Yes.
>Did they get much richer from their African colonies since Africa is the continent most abundant in natural resources?
Colonies benefits don't come solely from wealth anon. The reason why caring about a colonies "profitability" is a meme because governments aren't supposed to be making profits (that's not their purpose), that's governments engage in things that are a net cost on themselves but have other benefits to it like infrastructure projects in the U.S or running the water utility. They got many benefits out of them.
Did Germany's overall economy improve a lot during the colonial era?
Would Germany be as rich as it is today if colonialism didn't happen?
>hey guys lets all stand in a line and shoot while those other guys stand in a line and shoot
Why were armies before 1900 so fucking stupid?
>>2896728
How would you do it?
Remember;
C&C isn't instant
Your troops are illiterate at best, at worst speak different languages
Your weapons are equally inaccurate
>>2896728
No radios
>>2896728
guns back then were horrendously inaccurate, so soldiers standing side by side volley firing only made sense.
>Syria
Currently in civil war
>Iraq
Currently in civil war
>Lebanon
Survived 15 year civil war, now has terrorist group as major political party
>Israel and Palestine
Pretty much speaks for itself
>implying they weren't designed for that exact purpose
The mandates were explicitly designed to exacerbate inter-ethnic/religious tension
>Hamas
>Terrorists
American detected
>>2894380
>Pakistan
I know you all like Gandhi but he should have let us get rid of the moslem when we had the chance
now we have a 95% Moslem with 140 nukes and they are still making more
I just realized I don't know shit about Native Americans. Anybody here have any knowledge on the subject? Even just random stuff you know or have heard about your local tribes would be cool. Art, culture, politics, history, military, agriculture, religion, sport. Anything, really. Any books or websites you can point me to get started. I honestly don't know shit and I feel like I should know more.
>>2892062
My great grandfather was Miami Indian. Apparently they sided with the British and fought against the colonies.
>>2892062
well narrows it down, you are very broad. where do you wanna start
injun here btw
Mohawk
Custer died for your sins
How comes Ireland never made any noteworthy contributions to science or culture?
I mean, even Scotland had Maxwell, and it's not even a real country
>>2889430
Potato-niggers gonna potato-nig.
They produced some excellent writers in the XIX century.
>>2889430
what about that huge homosexual writer?
and that joyce bloke
they were also the first egyptians
>tfw if I was born a century earlier I would have been 58 by the end of world war ii
>probably would have been drafted into both world wars and ended as a lieutenant colonel as a logistics officer by 1945
>would have lived just long enough to see men landing on the moon then peacefully dying after buying my baby boomer grand son a mustang as a college graduation present paid in cash in full
just /his/ thoughts
>>2885285
>probably would have been drafted into both world wars and ended as a lieutenant colonel as a logistics officer by 1945
You probably would have died
>>2885342
No I am good at soldiering I am an expert fall of duty player
>>2885342
He's American, so I wouldn't say that's too likely. American casualty rates could be quite notoriously low so long as you weren't thrown into their minimal disastrous operations.
I've been taking a serious interest in Islam lately and I'm practically on the verge of converting. I need some help critically assessing this choice, so I'm turning towards you guys in hopes that you'll do me the favor of helping me think through this. Basically my line of reasoning boils down to four main points:
1. Traditionalism: I generally accept the arguments of the Traditionalist school as embodied in the writing of Rene Guenon. There is a "primordial tradition", a kind of pure metaphysics, of which all particular traditions are embodiments.
2. Most of these traditions suffer from issues relating to faulty/unreliable transmission of their texts and teachings.
3. Islam is the most reliably transmitted tradition.
4. Shi'a Islam is more reliable than Sunni (because of the transmission of teachings through the Ahl al-Bayt).
Since "traditionalist" style thinking is very deeply embedded in the way I view the world it is difficult for me to examine it critically. I was basically hoping we could engage in some dialogue and that you guys could throw a bunch of arguments my way. Obviously you don't have to do me that favor, but it could end up being a pretty fun discussion anyway.
pls no shitposting, take this seriously or just don't reply
Also I'm mainly interested in discussing the essential, "philosophical", points. Arguments like "this hadith says this" or "but that one time a Muslim did that", don't interest me very much since I consider them peripheral (not saying they have no validity, though). Obviously if you want to focus on that angle then I ain't stopping you, be my guest.
>>2885007
Religion of any type is for the weak
>>2885044
If a religion was shown to be true would you still reject it on the grounds that it "is for the weak"?
>>2885007
Islam is satanic. The angel speaking to Mohammad was not Gabriel. It was satan lying about his identity. Because that's what satan, and islam by extension, do. They lie.