Archived threads in /his/ - History & Humanities - 789. page

>>3001117
>it had to be small becoz he was raycist and insecure XDDDDDDDDDD amirite?

>>3001134
Hit a nerve anon? Dont worry anon you can get yourself always a shortstack

>>3001144
Never heard of that.

Joke's on him, ineffective governance is what leads to anarchy.

>>3000336
Anarchism was a comparatively huge movement from the late 1800s until the Spanish civil war.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_anarchism

He was based

Anarchytards deserve the gulag, helicopter and firing squad desu

French army was a meme after 1815

Prussia and Russia were stronger.

>>2999867
well the 19th century is a long time, for a small part of it the french probably had one of the most powerful armies in the world, but it was never deployed in large numbers colonially so unless the mexicans were a secret combatant in the napoleonic wars then i think they may be larping a little bit.

>>2999809
But anon...


Influence is a spook.

>>2999809
>constantly rails against "collectivism"
>philosophical influence is Plato
Pottery.

>>2999839
Someone can be influenced by an opposing opinion.

>>2999684
Do whites actually believe in the solutrean hoax?

I can't believe this was ever under debate, why did whitebois even WANT to be natives?

>>2999833
Americans like to we wuz this as it erases guilt that they displaced people already here. Also they want to be unique and having some native is exotic so its considered cool and special. Really it boils down to white guilt or being disconnected from your european heritage. Honestly mutts are the worst but I feel for them having no culture or knowing where to looks. Like american blacks and chicanos.

>>2999642

You question common law = meh
You question sharia = off with your head

>>2999642
Sharia Law is actually significantly more flexible than Common Law.

>>2999659
I cannot tell whether this is bait or not. I hope no one on this board is retarded enough to unironically say something like this.

Bad choice of picture, anon. That's a ukioye woosblock print from the Tokugawa period, which is early-modern and not medieval. Just sayin'.

>>2999564
japanese didnt have sex back then. thats why they took heads, they planted them to sprout more japtrees.
And that is from where we get the phrasing "nip it in the bud"

>>2999564
which time period are we talking about? for someone who supposedly at least read wiki, you seem very nonspecific in your questions.
If you're talking about the eras near the warring states period(muromachi) then it was more or less similar to the west in terms of nobility. Girls would be married off pretty young(15-16)and guys probably a bit older.
If you mean homosexuality vs. heterosexulity, apparently there was a known presence of dudes who life fucking dudes and it wasn't so much of a big deal. Tbh, it was almost Greek in practice.
For peasants, not too sure, but considering Jap history of confuscianism and the current zen buddism at that time, not too far off from the nobility.

Fuck you retard

0-1000 rise of abrahamic religion maybe?
1000-2000 industrial revolution

>>3000032
A single event, not an era or gradual rise of something. Like a coronation or assassination.

>>2999392
You're 100% completely WRONG. Its a Roman copy of a Greek work, not a view into the psyche of a Roman in 220BC. If the Romans gave a fuck about "Gauls" or "Barbarians" they wouldn't have shit on them every change they got and they wouldn't have thrown Ceasar a parade and made him emperor for slaughtering hundreds of thousands of them.

>>2999432
> be caesar
> think you will fall off earth if you sail to britain
> write about slaughtering gauls
> 2000 years later people still think you did it
> without evidence

it was this kind of genocidal retardation and pandering to the hatred of the masses that caused a civilisation to fall as repeated people tried to follow in his fictional footsteps and got raped by barbarians

>>2999392
>Those shitty spiky hair
Its Germanic alright

File: IMG_0613.jpg (290KB, 1536x1955px) Image search: [Google]

290KB, 1536x1955px

>>2999369

YES, AND THERE HAS ALREADY BEEN A WORLDEMPIRE —THE ORIGINAL EMPIRE; THE FIRST STATE; THE CIVILIZATION OF THE ORIGINAL ARYANS—; THE SECOND WORLDEMPIRE WILL BE ESTABLISHED AFTER ZIONISM, AND THE FORCES OF "EVIL", ARE DEFEATED; FOR A MILLENNIUM WILL THE ULTIMATE WORLDEMPIRE WILL FLOURISH ON EARTH, THEN THE WORLD WILL END, AND THE NOBLE ONES WILL TRANSCEND THE KOSMOS.

>>3000065
what did i just read in that pic and your post?

It seems likely that political stability is inversely proportional to population size and ethnic diversity.

If this is the case, than any world empire would need exceptionally effective mechanisms for legitimization, administration, and countering corruption.

>>2999327
Yes

Feels bad to be named after him

>>2999351
As a counter to this, no.

Feels terrific to be named after him.

>>2999351
It should be illegal

>>2999232
No

Although I guess it could work if we excessively automate but that would take jobs away from the poor countries so fewer people would be buying stuff although if they became middle class then they would but why would they be middle class if they don't produce anything and how could they automate if they're poor...It's all very confusing.

Probably not, no.

File: 1493691867644.jpg (124KB, 956x960px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 956x960px

>>2999232

>Oh no, I have to pay more my smart phone, the entire fabric of society has been undone!

yes

/thread

>>2999129
The Jews never really left Iberia.

Greedy colonialism.

He meant that the Spaniards know a sickness of the heart that only gold can cure.

>>2998966

Brit here, please can everyone contribute. I'm going to enjoy this thread.

File: Ottoman drugjpg.jpg (70KB, 596x664px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 596x664px

>>2998986
What with you and Opium?

>>2998996

Is that really true, though?

File: images (2).jpg (29KB, 397x371px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 397x371px

This wouldn't be an issue.

>>2998927

There is such a thing as Deism.

Thomas Jefferson edited his own version of the bible, which excluded all the supernatural and "because god says so" shit and just left the parts about Jesus and bros telling people how not to a cunt and be more than just an oxygen thief.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jefferson_Bible

>You get to worship Jesus without having to pay attention to the silly myths and retarded laws of the Old Testament.

Why even get so hooked on the Jesus character in the first place? It's just roman-era political revolt revanchism mania. The roman empire is 2000 years old, it's one of the least relevant thing to base your religion on in the modern era.