Spandau
I was quite shocked when he used the term MG 34 in his video about the panzer III
>>3062474
I was more shocked he'd never shot a gun and still had opinions about them
>>3062481
I was more shocked when he mentioned linguistics in Ancient Rome even though he doesn't speak ancient languages and has never been in Ancient Rome
>No enemy bomber can reach the Ruhr. If one reaches the Ruhr, my name is not Göring. You may call me Meyer.
What did Hermann Meyer mean by this?
>posting the doctored quote
The quote is
>No enemy bomber can reach the Ruhr. If one reaches the Ruhr, my name is not Göring. You may call me Josip Broz.
>>3061964
What did Hermann Josip Broz mean by this?
Does history/reality have an antisemitic bias?
It was one of the hardest pills to swallow, but no matter where I run to all fingers point towards a jew being the source of the problem
No it's quite the opposite you horrid barbarian revisionist.
>>3061732
>you horrid barbarian revisionist.
*1 shekel has been deposited into your account
Is it stupid thing or right?
Hitler was secretly a communist and lost the war to ensure much of Europe would be communist
he learned that dead people shit their pants upon death and wished to no longer be alone so he made sure he started a war that would kill lots
>>3061657
This is the correct answer. Hitler was a communist.
Just got finished reading this book. Pretty interesting look at history from the perspective of different understandings of world order, especially that established at the Peace of Westphalia. Anyone else here read this? What did you think?
>a fuckin accountant
a rockefeller agent accountant having any relevancy as a historian
>>3061712
he had first hand experience as a part of history
>>3061712
>not reading first hand accounts of influencers because they are "bad"
>historian
What should the "HRE test" be called?
I'm talking about the test which questions the validity of an entity's official name, for example:
---
>Holy
>Roman
>Empire
---
I personally like the term "three chevron test". What other names would you give it? "Voltaireposting" always works, but it sounds memey.
Onto another question - what country are you from and how does it perform on the test?
> Commonwealth
> of Australia
Commonwealth (n.) - a state formed for the common good -
Australia (n.) - the continent Australia
I think Australia succeeds the test on a moderate level at least, given it's fourth on inequality adjusted HDI and it covers what people think is the continent of Australia.
>united
check, at least under the same government with federal laws
>states
check
>of america
of a big chunk of north america at least
eh
>>3061121
>United
Politically yes, but socially no.
>>3061110
>democratic
No
>people's
Lol nope again
>republic
a state in which supreme power is held by the people and their elected representatives, and which has an elected or nominated president rather than a monarch
Big no
>of Korea
It's on the Korean peninsula, so that fits
1/4, no bueno
Why is western humanism so masochistic, self loathing, and self-destructive?
>>3061053
It was born out of Christian 'original sin' conception mixed with darwinist 'survival of the fittest' mentality
the consequence is both a very cruel and guilt ridden culture
>>3061053
its not
Name a better general. Pro tip- you cant
>>3060262
Hannibal
Scipio Africanus
Julius Caesar
Agrippa
Marius
Nader Shah
what exactly were his great tactical feats, the more I hear about him the more I think it was just because of his father's investment in the army
>>3060262
Cyrus > Alexander
Why were Central/South Americans more developed than North Americans by the time of European contact?
because they were the first to arrive in the continent while Native Americans were the latest to arrive before the bering ice bridge melted
>>3060210
What?
They arrived at the same time as they were the same people
Who do you think will win?
>>3059978
>has Muhammad
>doesn't ave Jesus
>>3059978
Mansa Musa, obviously.
let the games begin!
finally done with tests and noticed there wasn't one in a long time
will dump my folder, feel free to contribute
>>3052589
>>3052591
>>3052593
>Archaeologists have found the remains of 42 children sacrificed to Tlaloc (and a few to Ehecátl Quetzalcóatl) in the offerings of the Great Pyramid of Tenochtitlan.
>In every case, the 42 children, mostly males aged around six, were suffering from serious cavities, abscesses or bone infections that would have been painful enough to make them cry continually.
>Tlaloc required the tears of the young so their tears would wet the earth.
>As a result, if children did not cry, the priests would sometimes tear off the children's nails before the ritual sacrifice.[7]
>In History of the Things of New Spain Sahagún confesses he was aghast by the fact that, during the first month of the year, the child sacrifices were approved by their own parents, who also ate their children.[9]
Were the Spaniards justified in conquering the Aztecs?
>>3047831
sounds like the Spanish inquisition to me
>>3047831
THEY DINDU NUFFIN
>>3047831
It's a white supremacist conspiracy theory to make the noble savages look like Nazis!
This thread is meant for the discussion of Franks, especially their origins and the correlation between the Frankish and modern French.
>>3045391
Why did they divide land equally rather than just make the first son king of the Romans and the others dukes
>>3045409
Frankish cultural customs meant that they saw land as mere property to be divided up amongst sons almost equally.
>>3045409
you mean the division after the 843 treaty of verdun?
Or any ancient civilization of the Americas.
This is my favourite Mayan construction, the palace at Sayil.
>>3045130
>>3045131
Palenque
How did Roman Empire legitimize its rulership over the provinces?
Was is just a case of "Might makes it Right", or did they have any other sort of legitimization?
please respond
a mix of might make right and appeasing to the strongest warlord who would want to be bedfellows
being a roman is very attractive to people back then
>>3066800
I mean not in practice, but from an ideological perspective.
How would they persuade people in Iberia that Roman Empire is their rightful ruler?