Will I learn anything from reading Plato, Aristotle and the like? Or should I stick to the stoics?
Yes, you will learn many things.
You should put the Stoics to one side for now, and only read them if you find it helpful and comforting on a practical level.
The greatest texts produced by humanity were written between the 5th and 3rd century BC in Hellas and China. The stoic works from that period are lost, at least for now.
ONE, NOTHING WRONG WITH ME
TWO, NOTHING WRONG WITH ME
THREE, NOTHING WRONG WITH ME
FOUR, NOTHING WRONG WITH ME
FIVE, NOTHING WRONG WITH ME
SIX, NOTHING WRONG WITH ME
SEVEN, NOTHING WRONG WITH ME
EIGHT, NOTHING WRONG WITH ME
NINE, NOTHING WRONG WITH ME
TEN, NOTHING WRONG WITH ME
ELEVEN, NOTHING WRONG WITH ME
>>3156332
Leave the italians to me.
And leave the Austrians to me
they still didn't pass the piave tho
If the Franks had converted to Islam, would something like the Crusades still have happened, as a violent fever of particularly aggressive Germanic/European hajjis wanting to kill Jews and Shiites?
Take into consideration that the Normans were an irritation against the Byzantines in Sicily and that their heritage was basically a mix of Viking and French.
>>3156295
Consider this.
If the Germanic tribes never became Christian and invaded Rome as Pagans would something like the crusades have still happened?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aj13Y_H6lDo
So /his/, what is the answer to this great question, which has afflicted and concerned Japanese philosophers and artists of all kinds through centuries.
If dictators are so evil, why don't people just kill them?
Checkmate democracyfags
once given the opportunity, the people of many nations have chosen to oust their dictators by violence or by vote. It has happened many times.
If dictators are so good, why none ever got elected by democracy without rigging the poll or killing the opposition?
>>3156478
Because of x foreign medleing bruh. are you paying attention?
What area of the world has the most extreme Mongoloid phenotypes?
Does this coincide with light skin?
I note that many Siberian peoples are mixed with Russian (or Iranic?) blood.
>>3155867
Mongolia
>Be me, 16 years old
>1862, Battle of Shiloh
>General Beauregard tells us to prepare for battle
>My lieutenant is pissed, wanted to spend the next few days in the next town over fucking prostitutes
>Says he'd take me along
>Been thinking about it all week, the closest I've seen a naked woman is when the wind blew open the outhouse door when my aunt was in it
>Start marching into battle
>Hear Grant's army over the hill
>We line up, take aim and fire
>Lieutenant is hit in the gut, tells me to stay strong as he dies
>Fuck
>Reload my musket, some gunpowder falls out into my wrist
>Before I can aim I'm hit in the chest
>Mfw the closest I'd ever get to a vagina is the niter from the gunpowder that probably came from the sweet urine of a young southern girl
I'm like 90% sure the south used nitrate deposits for their saltpeter.
>>3155780
Wars probably made a lot of guys die virgins
How would Poland have fared had the they asked for Romania's help? Was it really a smart choice to simply use them as a neutral buffer and a route to supply their troops from the south?
>>3155769
The Romanian army would not be able to save Poland. They would have to fight the Soviets and the Germans at the same time, and their army wasn't very strong.
>>3155769
The Poles had one excellent opportunity to crush Germany, and that was by siding with the technologically sophisticated Czechs. But instead they stabbed the Czechs in the back in exchange for a tiny sliver of land that they lost again when the Nazis turned on them.
who were the greatest politicians of all time?
what accomplishments helped distinguish them?
what skills or tactics did they use to be effective?
Johnson was such a cringey faggot.
>everyone is deferring to me
>my faggy "power moves" work!
> surely it has nothing to do with the fact that I'm POTUS
>>3155676
>win presidential election with 60% of the popular vote
>get the biggest piece of civil rights legislation since the 1870s passed
>not alpha as fuck
>>3155676
>> surely it has nothing to do with the fact that I'm POTUS
POTUS != unlimited power
see last night
What's the run down of his forces pre glorified ambush and take down of the RAPACIOUS German Mercanaries?
I see it like this
>weak
>cold
>starving
>injured
>dwindling
Yet they somehow cross the Delaware and within a day engage in an ambush/ capture or one of the most badass fighters of the time.
Why do I have a hardtime buying this?
Did Washington have reinforcements Im not accounting for?
>>3155400
He murdered them while they were celebrating Christmas. Most of them were drunk.
In this thread, i would like to discuss the premisses of the spanish national syndicalist movement that took place in the XXth century in Iberia (during the 30's, being of utmost importance for the analysis of the spanish civil war from the nationalist's perspective and context) as well as the outcome of the said civil war and the repercussions it had in the Iberian Peninsulae. Exercise of hipothetical and fictional outcomes are allowed in this specific thread.
>Key historical figures (for this discussion):
1. Ramiro Ledesma Ramos; founder of the JONS (junta de ofensiva nacional-sindicalista); 1905-1936
2. Jose Antonio Primo de Rivera; founder of the FE (falange espanola) 1903-1936;
3. Onesimo Redondo; important member of the JONS even tough with a more nationalistic-catholic aproach; 1905-1936 (was married to Mercedes Sanz-Bachiller Izquierdo)
4. Francisco Franco, leader of the carlists (conservative monarchists) and of the nationalist army, 1892-1975
>I will start by stating a brief explanation on what was the national-sindicalist movement:
The national sindicalist movement was created by Ramiro Ledesma Ramos (a young spanish intelectual and philosopher who was seen with great-esteem by his professors) accordingly to the rise of nationalist and fascist movements troughout europe… seen as what could be perceived as a revival of XIXth century romantism, an analogy that i personnally like.
Ramiro Ramos devised a movement of his own, he understood that national movements should be directly applied to each countries specificities so he endorsed most of his ideas from leftist thinkers and economists but culturally chose to remain against globalism, internationalism and fiercely pro-nation sieged on the spanish historical base.
[1/2]
[2/2]
Later on, Ramiro Ramos allied his forces with Jose Antonio Primo de Rivera, founder of a more conservative fascist faction, the FE (spanish phalanx). Together they gained a lot of power but in the end (some claim due to personal reasons) they went separate ways with Ramiro Ramos accusing Primo de Rivera as a "sectarian conservative" and like the other european aristocrats that founded fascist movements (like Edward Mosley in England) he claimed that he was too disatached from the struggles of the people to have a true revolutionary line of tought.
Later on due to this fragilisation, both of them died during the war while Francisco Franco, a pure conservative, took advantage of their deaths to rise in power, endorse the national-sindicalist and falangist aesthetics and pervert it towards some kind of ultra-reactionary catholic dictatorship… In other words, Ramiro's fears had come to life. The nationalist revolution was lost to the hands of the reactionaries.
I will close this small dissertation by admitting that Ramiro Ramos's politics were way more cohese and interesting but even if he won his rule would be of short duration because he had plans of engaging the WWII by Hitler's side resulting in the devastation of Spain, unfortunately.
Thank you for your attention, feel free to discuss and construct your own opinions on the subject.
Advised Bibliography:
>Ramiro Ledesma-Discurso a las juventudes de Espana (edition of 1939)
Why would we want to see things from the nationalist point of view when it's far more interesting to study the revolutionary government, where it succeeded and how it failed because of rampant interference from fascist governments in the region.
>>3155391
Franco was not a Carlist.
Why did they take in the passage of Jesus and the adulterous woman if it was an obvious interpolation?
>>3155300
because it's nice
>>3155300
It happened. Which gospel should it be in?
Who cares?
what are some good books regarding the Islamic golden age especially under ummayad and abbasid caliphate?
>>3155116
Try your local library's fiction section.
Myth of the Andalusian Paradise
Thoughts on this man?
Liberator & hero, or oppressor & villain?
A fucking arrogant rich kid with a typical catholic martyr complex. Political and military failure.
>>3154888
Neither
At first
>Man of People and hand of Fidel
Then
>Armed force and official voice of the revolution
Finally
>Inconvenience to Fidel and no more use for the now established regime
The iconic image of Guevara is a brave fighter who would do anything for a good cause. So it's only sad how, analyzing his history, to see how he got used by everybody.
It's no coincidence that Guevara most common things are phrases and photos. Souvenirs used from time to time for all sort of purpose. But in the end, just a romanticized canon fodder
at best he will be know as a guy that called America out of their bullshit and nothing else.
everything else was failure
Did he really flee Japan to later resurface as Genghis Khan?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minamoto_no_Yoshitsune#Rumors_and_legend
>pic slightly related as I couldn't find a better pic
>>3154833
If he's Genghis Khan then I'm Jesus's brother
>>3154949
hello there fellow brother in Christ
I'd sooner take the Aeneid literally.