I mean come on, /his/, they had the lowest taxes than any other British colony. And the American Revolution was primarily based on the fact that the North American colonists didn't have representation in Parliament for their taxation.
I was even told Britain was going to give them representation in due time if it wasn't for them rebelling.
Tbh senpai, imho, I think USA shouldn't have seceded from her mother country Britain. What do you all think?
I'd go as far as saying that it happened, therefore it was.
Of course, I'm just saying but... yeah.
Yes
It permitted them to become a superpower instead of ending up like Canada because of Britain's loser influence
>>77618
That's one broad ass question.
No seriously, I mean the ethics of taxation, representation, colonialism... I don't think I could answer the question in less than 2 hours anon.
Who's your favorite assassin, /his/?
Destroyer of meme empires.
the hashashins desu
me desu
What does /his/ think of the Qing dynasty?
I think the Qing dynasty is really interesting. I've been taking a grad seminar with a Chinese history expert and we've spent a good amount of time on them, mostly on the McCartney mission, comparative global history, and Qing governance in SW China.
Just finished reading The Great Divergence a week ago and I'm curious about /his/'s reaction to the sort of exacting cliometric history Pomeranz uses to build his argument that the Qing dynasty was not inherently less disposed towards industrializing, but failed to do so because of its coal deposits and lack of colonial peripheries (in really reduced terms). Do ya'll think Qing China could have equalled Great Britain if they had been more interested in acquiring overseas markets and that they were actually a very dynamic people, or do you guys think that the letter form the Qianlong emperor where he rejects western technology wholesale is a reflection of cultural stagnancy in the Qing empire at the time?
Europe's favorite punching ball
How do you pronounce Qing /his/?
"Chin" or "Queen"?
"Chin" here
>i must unite the germanic peoples under one flag
what did he mean by this? why didnt he force austria to join?
>>77434
>Austria didn't want to give up Hungary and Slavic lands.
>Prussia didn't want Slavs and Hungarians in greater Germany if it were to exist.
>One of the two major kings would have had to stand down, a huge humiliation.
Grossdeutchland lösung would have been awesome though.
>>77434
>the germanic peoples
The German peoples
Stop using German and Germanic as synonyms
Germans are ONE Germanic people AMONG MANY OTHERS
Germanic is to German what Slavic is to Polish
Bismarck wanted to unite the Germans people (Bavarians, Hanoverians, Prussians, Austriians...) not the Germanic peoples (Swedes, Danes, Norvegians, Germans, Dutch, Brits...)
>>77434
If he annexed Austria it would have compomised the power of the Protestant Prussians within Germany. Also unlike a certain Kaiser that came later Bismarck understood Germany needed as many strong allies as possible. Austria-Hungary was a perfect ally.
Why did the Proletariat fail to rise up and seize power from the bourgeoisie? The global revolution should have happened by now, but instead the world is more unequal than ever.
Because that's not how history works.
I'm looking at you too, progress-believers.
>>77378
You're not paying attention. The 20th century was defined by the conflict of revolutionary proletarians against bourgeois states. Strong-arming, sabotage, and counter-revolution stymied these movements in the early 90s but that is a short history. It took the capitalist class much longer to establish their revolution over the earth.
>the world is more unequal than ever.
And this is precisely why history has not ended.
Because inequality is not wrong.
what are some of the most ugly and hellishly horrifying moments in human history?
>>77061
The stuff De Las Casas had to witness.
>>77061
I have to imagine that it must have been fucking terrifying for the Native American injuns to have experienced contact with Europeans.
Probably vice versa as well.
>>77061
id imagine being raided by the mongolians has to be up there somewhere, also being an innocent, free first world white person and being kidnapped by the arab warlod and forced into slavery... shits kinda fucked man. To taste freedom only to know how badly your suffering. I heard Americans even got captured.
How does /his/ feel about Stirner?
>>77058
keep your meme on /lit/ pls
>>77085
This is the philosophy board.
Is he the one that wrote Gravity's Jest?
This is pre-history and part of the history of humans, therefore /his/ related (that being said the sticky should probably address if neanderthals and history of all species within the homo genus are /his/ related or not).
So what is /his/' take on the out of Africa theory?
I've seen loads of support for multiregionalism on 4chan, but I don't think it's actually taken seriously by many professionals.
>>76674
first of all, yeah i would believe this and other anthropological topics are /his/ related, as long as they are not clearly meant to be offensive to a certain group (bait)
and yeah, the out of africa theory is generally accepted. its clear all humans are the same race, and it had to originate somewhere
did anyone ever try to explain WHY early humans would have left africa?
deserts and snow-topped mountains aren't exactly "better" places to live
Why couldn't the brother of Jesus defeat the Manchus and restore the Ming to temporal rule?
Restore the Ming? Just because they had long hair does not put them in the Ming camp.
The reason they lost is because they literally went against God by not having any Westerners on their side.
>tfw ever-victorious army led by Yuropean officers
>debt eternal
>>76510
Because, historically, the Han Chinese have always been raped in the ass and subjugated and ruled by the nomadic tribes.
Because Zeng Guofan is a badass.
Is the Spanish Inquisition the worst thing the Catholic church has ever done?
>350 years long
>complete intolerance and repression of all other religions
>150,000 charged with crimes of heresy
>2,000-5,000 executed
>torture
>censorship
>>76348
>2,000-5,000 executed
Over 350 years? You were probably more likely to be eaten by a shark.
heretics got what they deserve senpai
>spanish inquisition
>not the fourth crusade
baka
Anyone feel the 25 year cutoff is a bit strict?
That doesn't even take as all the way out of the cold war, and a shit ton of important historical technological and social events went down in the 90s, let alone the 00s.
I think it should be a more holistic rule, that is you have to refer to something in a historical context, not "news"
For example, if I wanted to so a thread on the cultural and economic development of Hip Hop and rap music and its parallels to diffusion of other cultural aspects in the united States, I would be forced to stop at the most critical moments.
And that's just in the broad strokes.
Shit like the Rwandan Genocide,Soviet Break up, the creation of the Euro, the German reunion, everything that went down in the Balkans, and countless more capital H historical events are not allowed on the board dedicated to history.
That's not really fitting with the spirit of the board.
>>76344
I agree, it should be a 10 year cut off
>>76344
I think it should be a 30 year cut off. I really don't want /his/ to be /pol/ 2.0.
Everything is always at the mods discretion. I'm sure if we talk civilly about an actual historical happening that occurred in the last 25 years, the mods will let things go. It's just a rule in place to give a hard and fast reason to prune anything that looks remotely like bait.
Were Ancient Persians dark skinned or did they look like the man pictured here (note, I look like him too). I'm referring to the ones that inhabited Persepolis.
I recently had a debate with someone who argued Ancient Persians looked dark skinned and somewhat like modern Pakistanis:
Read Chanakya Aryabhata's comment responses here:
https://www.quora.com/What-nationalities-are-considered-white-What-mix-of-nationalities-or-percentage-of-white-would-still-be-considered-white/answer/Bob-Jackett?srid=iJDN&share=1
He does a good job defending his viewpoint, so I recommend reading our whole argument.
they were black ofc
>>76353
Maybe the Elamites were? I don't know.
>>76353
He gives interesting criticisms of Kurgan Hypothesis, so it's relevant to people interested in European migrations too.
>Defeating a superpower and a legendary army that defeated third reich composed of thousands of men and advanced weaponery
>Defeating a coalition of 37 countries which is composed of top world armies without any state support
How did they do it ?
>>76280
Gorilla warfare
>>76280
Being a mountain people like the swiss or the highlanders
>how did the fucking mujahideen do something
>the fucking paladin mountain warriors of islam
What to call em?
http://strawpoll.me/5906074
There was no break in continuity from the Roman Empire, and it's just a better sounding name than Byzantine.
>>76212
>Romeika
m8, this means "roman (things)" or the Greek language
>pick one
But they're all true.
>300 vs 2 million
How did they do it?
300 Spartans [spoiler]plus 1000 Thebans and 2500 other Greeks[/spoiler]
grinding
Pecs