Archived threads in /his/ - History & Humanities - 4239. page

>>367165

They would if they could.

/thread

>>367165
something something laws and shit

>>367165
The military and police. The whole point of those organizations have historically been to maintain the status quo through force.

Imagine three persons with one soul.

>>366958

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KQLfgaUoQCw

It's stupid bullshit. It's something i'd expect an anime writer or something to come up with.

>>366848
Evolution and original sin are incompatible if you hold that the original sin was an actual action that took place by our first parents

>>366848
Blame protestants and their literal interpretation meme

Ah, yes. The old "God did it" explanation, just moved up a step.

>she will never dom you

why live

File: UR1AWlY.jpg (10KB, 441x408px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 441x408px

>>366847
>truly blessed by God

Yet executed by the Catholic Church

>>366895
Cathoshits, not even once

>>366608

>the british aren't responsible for ending the transatlantic slave trade

>the u.s. lost vietnam

>Greeks and Romans were like the greatest thing everr

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=29UMACdfyZw

>>365634
They threw the vikings out, and much later the brits. Then again, they did both those things at a time when everyone was doing it.

3D Video games wouldn't exist and physics would have been held back if it wasn't for a single Irishman.

If you dont know who that is, you should go back and study your significant Irish figures.

>>365292

Sending all Germans to gas camps.

>>365292
I abandon the Japs entirely, concentrate on driving towards Moscow and Leningrad before winter, and sue for peace with England.

>>365313
how would you be able to sue peace with church hill?

>>364069
>morality
>>>/pol/

>>364069
>but if you were in their place, would you want to remain in ignorance?
That seems to be quite clearly what they want. They question, should we care about their wishes? Does a collective have the right to maintain its integrity by preventing the individual from encountering other collectives or individuals? I'd say no, and our readiness to grant some warrior king or something the sufficient souvereignty to determine the fate of generations to come betrays a deep mistrust of our own civilization.

Interesting

but I think you are asking the wrong way, I think and I assume we all do that you would first have to KNOW you have been ignorant of something to identify that ignorance

Are these people aware they are ignorant?
Probably not

Is it morally correct to bring them to our age? well I think the answer obviously lies within your own definition of morals.
My personal feelings are that no the government should not protect them but would it benefit them?
Surely they would have longer life expectancy but they would also lose a self identity for a while which could possibly drive someone insane.

I can't put myself in their place completely because I am aware of my ignorance so The answer could only ever be subjective and in my opinion no objective argument could properly exist.

Palestinians dont exist

>>363399

>Zionist movements in Europe
>Holocaust guilt
>Jewish settlers increase
>King David Hotel bombing by Jewish terrorists
>string of attacks by Jewish terrorists (Irgun, etc) against British authorities

You get the idea

>>363399
White guilt

>>362688
Oh, look. Someone from >>>/pol/ trying to sound like an objective researcher with no prior bias on the issue.

>>362688
>I just did a few days of in depth research

Congratulations. Go write an academic paper, get it peer reviewed by others in the field, get it published, be praised for uncovering the international Jewish conspiracy, and acquire your Nobel Peace Prize.

>>362693
if it makes you feel any better my father is jewish and my mother is half maori

I'm not a stormweenie

>>362637
>No Germany

Where will my blond boy toys come from then?

File: emotionless.jpg (87KB, 580x393px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 580x393px

>>362637
>Mongols are Christianized
>join crusaders
>muslims BTFO
>Mongols convert their regions to Christianity
>Christianity has billions of more followers
>Mongol leaders become saints and shit

>>362637
Give Netherlands, Belgium and Luxembourg to France and that's perfect

>>362108
Posting the sources from the statements.

(1) on the existance of the Universe
http://godevidence.com/2010/12/ok-i-want-numbers-what-is-the-probability-the-universe-is-the-result-of-chance/

(2) on the existance of Earth
https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-probability-of-the-earth-existing-if-there-was-a-reboot-from-Big-Bang

(3) on the existance of life
http://www.science20.com/stars_planets_life/calculating_odds_life_could_begin_chance

(4) on number of atoms in the Universe
http://www.universetoday.com/36302/atoms-in-the-universe/

>>362108
>The Universe exists. That is a fact.
>But it is also a fact that it came into existance.

No, that is not a fact.

>Scientists calculate, namely Penrose, that the odds of the Universe existing are 1 in 10 to the power of 10 to the power of 123, that is 1 followed by 10 to the 123rd power zeros

What the hell does that even mean, and how does one calculate it?

>The very odds of Earth existing in its position in relation to tghe sun, its composition, its atmosphere, all that has the odds of
It is admitted by scientists that the odds of the Universe existing are 10 to the power of 23

Again, how is this calculated? And if the universe is infinite, which it seems to be, then it doesn't matter how "improbable" life is. It is bound to happen. I wouldn't say the universe is made for life either, if the universe is good at anything it is making black holes.

> keep in mind that there are arround 10^80 atoms in the universe

I'm pretty sure you mean OBSERVABLE universe.

>The fact we have so little odds of existing makes it impossible for all of this not having been orchestrated by a Creator

Why? If the universe is so complicated and fine-tuned that it has a minuscule chance of existing then a universe creator must also have a minuscule chance of existing, since anything that can create universes must be more complicated and fine-tuned than the universe.

>>362108
>>362108
The simple answer would be, low odds =/= impossible, and that these odds are spread over a potentially long time.

There is also the admittedly circular reasoning that if it was impossible, we wouldn't exist and be able to ask the question

>I get my history from movies and games
Thanks for sharing OP

>>361464
Well depending on your definition almost all warfare that isn't tribal warfare was line warfare until 1860. The Romans and vikings fought in lines too.

That said you mean strictly 1700-1815 stuff you should look a bit more into it. Especially cavalry did some interesting things in those days.

File: is this bait.png (26KB, 527x409px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 527x409px

>>361464

File: 1441014493079.jpg (14KB, 251x242px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 251x242px

>communism is good in theory

>>361004
>consciousness isn't just an emergent property of our pattern

>>361011
oh shit, that one especially