What's up, /his/? I'm writing a paper on why refugees shouldn't be accepted into America, and I was comparing Islam to other religions, the main one being Christianity. I touched up on 2 violent verses from the Quran and now I feel to prevent myself from creating a logical fallacy my teacher will inevitably point out and mark me down for, I should also point out that Christianity has some violent verses in the bible, but the militancy rates of Christians are pretty low. Can anyone provide some statistics for the rates of militancy in Christians?
TL;DR I need some statistics for christian militancy rates. Also do you think Islam is really a religion of peace?
>>396080
You've already failed by taking religion at face value
>>396080
Christian Militants have killed more people post 9/11 in america, but you know, higher population and all that.
http://securitydata.newamerica.net/extremists/deadly-attacks.html
has sources and is pretty balanced
Just check through this website in general.
Personal opinion, the refugee's aren't a big deal and are massively overblown in significance.
>>396089
Reiterate. My teacher is pretty fine with my arguments if I can back them up with credible facts.
This board is dedicated to the discussion of history and the other humanities such as philosophy, religion, law, classical artwork, archeology, anthropology, ancient languages, etc. Please use /lit/ for discussions of literature. Threads should be about specific topics, and the creation of "general" threads is discouraged.
For the purpose of determining what is history, please do not start threads about events taking place less than 25 years ago. Historical discussions should be focused on past events, and not their contemporary consequences. Discussion of modern politics, current events, popular culture, or other non-historical topics should be posted elsewhere. General discussions about international culture should go on /int/.
/his/ is not /pol/, and Global Rule #3 is in effect. Do not try to treat this board as /pol/ with dates. Blatant racism and trolling will not be tolerated, and a high level of discourse is expected. History can be examined from many different conflicting viewpoints; please treat other posters with respect and address the content of their post instead of attacking their character.
When discussing history, please reference credible source material, and provide as much supporting information as possible in your posts.
When somebody says they're a "Gnostic" today: Are they in a direct continuity from the Gnostics of early Christianity?
>>433693
It varies desu.
I consider myself gnostic but I do fuck-all research about christian gnosticism and the nag hammadi, my knowledge generally comes more from random readings of the kabbalah and the anthroposophical/rudolf steiner society
so yeah when you ask someone if they're gnostic as if they're Christian Gnostic.
>>433697
So for you Gnosticism = Occultism, in a sense?
>>433707
Gnosis, for me, means higher knowledge. A shaman doing hardcore drugs and inquiring the high spirits to grant him knowledge of "higher worlds" is a Gnostic as much as the buddhist who is meditating and trying to figure out the whole of reality is. Christian Gnosticism is less Gnosis for me and more like passing dogma and teachings down from ancient scripts.
So yeah, occultism would be gnosis in a certain way, but from what little I've read early christian Gnostics were actual Gnostics in their beginning.
Why does /his/ like military history so much?
Threads about history of warfare and strategy usually get dozens and hundreds of replies, while other historical topics rarely gain this kind of tract (exceptions exist of course).
You would think it was only WW2 and corresponding events that are popular, but also early modern, ancient and medieval warfare gets a lot of attention. Why is this the case in your opinion?
>>433457
grog shit
>>433457
War is the ultimate expression of humanity's soul
Loads of documentation and a love of violence?
What is your opinion on her?
>>433359
Underrated savior.
She will intercede for France again in its coming hour of need
>>433359
much ballyhoo'd school spirit coordinator
So tell me, /his/, where does the philosophical justification to govern come from?
>Justification
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m9We2XsVZfc
>Implying any governments beyond democracies need a "justification"
>>433144
Oh ve are der Vikings!
Der Vikings, der Vikings...
Oh ve are der Vikings!
Ve're gunna steel your stoof!
Oh ve are der Vikings!
Der Vikings, der Vikings...
Oh ve are der Vikings!
Ve're gunna steel your stoof!
>>432703
sounds like a yiddish accent
reeeeeeeeeee get out
The Vikings tried Canada, and they were killed off presumably.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L%27Anse_aux_Meadows
ITT post historical songs. Bonus points for contemporary recordings of historical songs about historical events (preferably no classical music).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZWCqGF1PPbk
When did it all go wrong?
I'll kick it off with a few favorites:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hjbwfhmLqYo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PkxPp
cmiZMM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_NNgLqz89Z8
>>432630
>starts with renaissance
Ancient music was fucking expressionist tier m8
does anyone else just love this nigga? he was right about pretty much everything. he really understood the nature of suffering and want. you can see it right in his eyes. kinda just wanna give schopy a big old hug
>>431730
>le angry manlet
he was just bitter because Hegel fucked a young girl he was trying to get at before him.
>>431970
No he didn't. The hedgehog dilemma was something he came up with on the spot trying to get into a blonde's undergarments, and she rejected his manlet ass.
The most important question you can ask is whether or not God exists, because that would determine whether death is nothing or a potential eternal punishment/reward. Discuss.
You're asking whether heaven or hell exists, not whether god does, they can be mutually exclusive.
>>431434
True, though that seems less probable.
>>431420
People fail to appreciate the poetic language of religious texts, and how they explain human nature.
For example: I believe that Jesus was real and was really crucified and resurrected.
Jesus preached charity, egalitarianism, taught that good works help the world, preached against earthly titles, and taught that you should resist hedonistic desires.
Now you can follow Jesus' teachings and believe that He was crucified and resurrected. Or you can believe that Jesus didn't exist. His preachings, either way, still have philosophical value.
Ok so, I've read Augustine's Confessions and some of Kierkegaard's books. Being an atheist myself, I was very surprised of how beatiful the life of a christian can be, thanks to the christian morality and the austhere peace of a life devoted to faith. I really feel changed after these readings; even though I can't have faith in a religious God, I'm starting to repulse lots of futile desires and I'm replicing stupid hobbies with meditation and reading.
Where I can continue my pursue? I feel like repression and austerity really helps my quest for happines, and loving an unchangable ideal is more rewarding than loving a person. Any other books this kind of life, but from an atheistic POV?
>>431035
Epicrueanism and Stoicism.
Here pal:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1z4w8x_H8miK2FuVaOo_Due82cOWOnZFrtnPSC0vlOi4/edit?pref=2&pli=1
>>431048
Meant to say check out Epicetus and Stoicism, the link confused me.
>>431035
I find Kirkeegaard easier to be relevant to atheism rather than Christianity. I doubt very many Christians would be fine with his anti-clergy stance. One can read his work metaphorically or by taking his concept of Faith and applying it to one's own creeds rather than a distant God. If you do this his words make perfect sense.
What are your thoughts?
Depends on the subject.
Can analytic philosophy explain love?
Why do i see people spamming the same fucking shit threads all day?
>>430666
>Can analytic philosophy explain love?
It can, but it depends on what kind of explanation you want. Do you want the scientific explanation, or the phenomenological explanation?
How did they manage to survive the fall of Soviet Union?
They were never a part of the Soviet Union and didn't undergo the social movement that swept Eastern Europe after the Berlin wall fell.
See also: Cuba, Vietnam
>>430318
See, this is weird. By all means, NK ought to be SHREKD by the fall of the USSR. Its whole economy was dependent on them.
강성대국
What are some examples of colors having an important role in a culture?
Blue among the Tuareg and in Judaism
Green in Islam
Red in China
>>430010
Purple is the Royal Color in Ancient Greco-Roman and classical world. Due to the fuck-expense of acquiring a specific type of purple: Tyrian Purple. Purple became associated with Nobility/Royalty in Yurop.
In China and large bits of East Asia, Yellow is the Royal Color. This is due to Ancient China and is based on two things
1) Color of Gold
2) The Yellow muddy color of the Huanghe river: the valleys that run through it being the homeland of the Chinese race, in which their legendary first Emperors -most likely tribal leaders- claimed power over the yellow silty water through irrigation and damming.
In either case, Yellow became the Imperial Color of the Chinese. Chinese influence then sent this notion across East Asia.
Inca
Gold =solar significance, called "sweat of the sun"
Silver = lunar significance, called "tears of the moon"
Aztecs
Jade = represents fertile earth
Turquoise = represents water/sky
The emperors' speech in illustrations would be shown as a blue scroll emanating from the mouth, symbolizing his divine authority.
>>430057
That's interesting, thank you
I read an article about ultramarine blue. During Renaissance it was considered the color of the vest of Mary, related to humility and holiness. The pigment was made by grinding lapis lazuli extracted from caves in Afghanistan and browght to Europe by Italian merchants. It was extremely expensive and it was a true object of desire for every artist. Michelangelo didn't use any ultramarine on the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel since he was the one paying his matherials, but when he painted the giudizio universale he used a lot of it for the sky, for the pope himself was financing him.
In 1826 the pigment was first obtained chemically and nowadays you can buy a buck of it for a few dollars. But one should remember that ultramarine blue, once considered the essence of the colour blue itself, was used with extreme care by artists in the past.
Who invented modern underwear? Was it just loincloths before? Were the Spartan warriors freeballing?
>>429902
>Modern Underwear
The 19th Century Europe.
During the medieval ages, Bras and panties were around, though garterless and secured by other means. So too was this big onesie underdress
>>429943
In the East (well, China really), women had a loincloth and this bra/tank top thing called a dudou. Which is a sheet that is secured via a system of strings and supports the breasts.
It is currently undergoing a modern revival of sorts as a lingerie/tank top. Pic related.
In before the Lengburg castle 'bra and panties'
Its not a bra, it's part of a linen under dress with the bottom part removed. The pants are mens pants similar to the ones seen in dozens of paintings of stripped male martyrs.