Why is this guy so respected? He had the luckiest set of situations imaginable given to him. He practically got England for free.
>>481130
Because he won the war and conquered a kingdom
>>481150
He got a freeby when it comes to conquest
>>481154
He still won
Is there any historical validity to the reconstruction of ancient martial arts, such as seen in the HEMA/WMA movement?
>>481056
a bit off topic but what's with that bald spot haircut? why was it so common? fashion? I thought it was only a monk thing, are those battlemonks?
>>481056
Is there some sort of chief world history organization that decides whether a reconstruction of something historical is valid?
>>481070
They are quite likely monks yes.
Anyone know where I can get college-level history tests and exams if I'm not a history student?
Let me explain a bit. I'm in college right now but I'm studying something that is not history for the reasons of getting a good career. That said, I love history, and I want to become as expert on the subject as I can despite not being on expert on paper.
I've been reading lots of somewhat "academic level" history books and things like that, and I've been teaching myself Latin and Koine Greek so I can read primary sources. But sometimes I forget dates and places and people and have to consult my books before I make a statement on something.
So is there a website where I can take the kind of exams that would be given to history majors? That way I can study for them and have the facts and stuff solidified in my memory, and also get the satisfaction of knowing that I "passed" that course or section.
Same goes with Latin. I can't really afford a private Latin tutor, so are there any websites where I can take Latin and Koine Greek tests to test my proficiency?
>tl;dr
Where can I get a hold of the exams and tests that history majors would be expected to take, so I can help with my amateur studies of history?
Then again perhaps I'm underestimating what professional historians actually know off the tops of their heads. Does the average historian really know, for example, the number of men involved in a particular battle, the order of battle, the commanders, the casualties, etc of a campaign in ancient times? Or do they usually consult the sources and take notes before giving a speech about it or something.
And yes before anyone tells me, I already tried googling it. Didn't get any results, just practice AP exams for generic "world history." I'm looking for specific exams and quizzes over things like Alexander's conquests, the Punic Wars, stuff like that.
You could probably download some. Find an examination body, and History Past Paper.
>beat saxons
>beat irish
>beat franks
vikings were unstoppable force and the best warriors of their time prove me wrong
my ancestors speak to me
>>480828
>prove me wrong
Scandinavia was Christianized.
>>480828
>tfw my ancestors don't speak to me
>>480828
>beat saxon villagers
>beat irish villagers
>got beaten by the Franks at Paris
Vikings are shit, whenever they came up against a trained and organised force they got btfo.
>it's treason, then
If God and Satan were real, with whom you would sympathies lie?
>>480819
If God and Satan were real, than the book of Job rather firmly declares that Satan works for God, and there is no treason.
>>480917
Doesn't declare that anywhere, m80
>>480922
You haven't actually read Job, have you? Or did you somehow miss the parts where Satan walks up and down the earth, investigating things and then reporting them to God? Or how he has to ask God for permission before he starts smiting people?
Best secret polices of history?
keep it a /his/ quality discussion not a pol tier retarded shitfest
The Stasi, no contest. Did its job exceedingly well and cleanly, most people were barely aware it of its operations.
>starts thread with an edgy unrelated image just because he is paranoid the polfags will spam Gestapo with no end
Stassi > Mossad > CIA > Gestapo > DINA
do Oprichniki count?
>Be George Washington
>be general in 15 battles
>lost 10
>presented as best general of 18 century
>mfw
>>480778
Not everyone is American, you know?
>>480778
He won the war.
>>480778
Is Assassin's Creed the worst thing to happen to the popular conception of history in the last 50 years?
Say what you want about commies but comissars had awesome hats I couldn't follow a hatless man I mean what are you shitting me you look like a fucking pleb it's pretty much a fact that hats equal authority. Historical hats thread.
>>480669
Get out peasant
As I get older the more fucked up the whole commissar thing was. These were a bunch of 23-26 year olds radicalized by communist and executing their fellowman. Idk the older I get the more fucked up war seems. It blow mys mind when I hear about how young guys had a bunch of men under their command. Major Winters was only like 26 years old by the time of Bastonge.
>>482344
Who else was supposed to lead a command during war? All the ones who saw combat and were old were also dead.
Is it true that Portuguese or should I say "Moortuguese" people share 90% of their DNA with North Africans and are secretly Muslims?
Si
you should go back to /int/
>>480567
I'm Portuguese and I don't consider myself white because my dad definitely looks like a fucking Moor
Absolutely nothing about the culture that is Muslim in the slightest though
So, how does /his/ divide the timeline of european history?
>~500 BCE +- 200 Starting age
>0 +-200 Golden age
>900 CE +-500 Warring Tribes
>1700 CE +- 200 Pre-Modern Colonialism
>1950 CE +-30 World Wars
>>480413
>>480902
What are good books for a comprehensive introduction to the history of art? Particularly looking for something that stresses how the evolution of art fits into the larger philosophical development of European culture.
Any1
Gardener's Art through the Ages: A Global History
>>479985
Bit offtopic, but I find Waterhouse to be one of the greats, and I feel like he never gets the attention he deserves, or maybe I just prefer his style of paintings over that of Picasso or Dali.
Do you know any historical moments where the bad guy won? Most of the times dictators etc. seem to be killed off eventually. Only ones I remember dying from old age while still being in power is Franco and Stalin.
Pretty much always
define good and bad
A lot of times there just wasn't really a good guy. Like WW1, the Russian Revolution, pretty much every Chinese civil war, the recent and current conflicts on the Middle East.
Was the height of a man as glorified in older times, no matter what century, as it is nowadays? Did people offer you certain jobs, special military units or anything else? Did shorter people have it worse in any way, or was it completely irrelevant? If so, when did height become such an important thing in most societies nowadays?
>>479966
Is this a subtle manlet bashing thread?
>>480000
No I'm serious.
Nice quads tho
>>479966
>special military units
The First King of Prussia was obsessed with tall guardsmen. There was a height requirement to be a Prussian Guard to the King.
Also Grenadiers were big men since the belief being large cunts can throw grenades further. Eventually Grenade throwing was phased out and Grenadiers were just selected for their physical strength as they were shock troops and expected to ace in hand2hand combat.
Dump, Discuss, etc
I'll be posting some, feel free to contribute.
Is intellectual discourse really just shitposting using fancy words?
No, you're thinking of academia qua profession.
>>479866
no it is fancyposting about useless shit
>>479866
Clearly. See Diogenes