Any recommendations on books about the history of the Indus Valley Civilization and of later developments in South Indian history like the Chola dynasty?
>hero to the English people
>didn't even speak English
why are they so stupid?
>>3376775
>hero to the French people
>wasn't French nor spoke French
why are they so stupid?
>>3376775
More religious than nationalism
>>3376800
Charlemange probably knew some sort of Old French, or one of the Langues d'oïl. Richard I spoke occitan
Is he worth reading?
Not as history.
if you're interested in the 18th century
He's kind of like Aristotle in that most of what he says isn't correct, but he helped people form a mode of historical literature.
So, no.
So was it ever passed into law to give reparations to slaves and never followed through, or was it just empty rhetoric by people like Sherman that never went anywhere?
>>3376605
Sherman never wanted to pay any reparations and he hated niggers to the bone. He just wanted to settle them on the tidal islands of Georgia, that's what the "40 acres and a mule" shit refers to.
>>3376631
Is that the only place it came from?
What did he mean by this?
The New Chronology Movement. History was fabricated in one generation
https://youtu.be/pN8a8sj1Hxc
is this how the romans looked like?
>>3376366
I don't see why not
is this how the Trojans looked like?
>>3376366
Nah, they were blonder than that
Your pic is how Ancient Egyptians looked like
Anna Comnena a cute
>>3376365
damn, i want to see her getting DP'ed by black slaves
>>3376365
No wonder her brother forgave her when she tried to murder him for the throne.
>>3376365
>Be Anna Komnena.
>Masturbate furiously to stronk Norman knights
>Normans = Barbarians according to Byzantines.
>yfw Anna had modern equivalent of Black Fetish.
Is it historically accurate?
>>3376358
Who cares, it's cringey as fuck
Is he, dare I say it, our guy?
>>3376339
Kinda looks like Jerry Seinfeld
>what kinda country you after bruh
>gimme that "Revolution every 30 years" fade
>I got you
Seriously what is the reason for this?
>>3376242
Gay parisians
what is /his/'s opinion of this man?
>>3376233
>France would have been mostly Muslim had they won at Tours
Yeah, no.
entertaining to watch
How accurate is this post ?
>>3376211
Wewuz memes aside, even if that's true, it wouldn't explain why the hurricane is striking in Florida, a state with a large Black and Hispanic population. Unless black people hate hispanics too, i don't know about that
>>3376211
100%
>>3376228
Hispanics and blacks don't really like each other despite the fact that the media creates a narrative that tries to show otherwise. 'My exs grandmother was a black Cuban woman who wrote one of her other grandchild off her will for getting pregnant by an African American and always complained about having nigger grandchildren
What was its actual effect on the Soviet Union politically, both internally and externally?
How did it escalate into such a massive fucking disaster?
Was it inevitable?
What's some good reading/watching on the event?
>>3376133
it was a truly example of soviet efficiency.
There were a lot of things that had to happen in a certain way for the disaster to occur and unfortunately they did happen. All of the things that occurred compounded to make the reactor extremely unstable and every safety feature designed to be fail-safe was turned off. The reactor was operating completely outside of its design. Due to poor training and lack of knowledge as well as deviation from test protocols the operators made it possible for the reactor to be in such a state. That said, the reactor design also had many flaws because it didn't comply with standards of nuclear reactor safety.
The disaster was probably inevitable, in my opinion. Given the lack of safety and non-compliance of safety standards, lack of training, not following procedure, bad procedures and instructions, lax safety culture, faulty design, and lack of foresight if it didn't happen that day it would have happened on another. The same test was done 4 years previous and it was fine, for instance.
During the time it made US-Soviet relations better/ more cooperative. Because of it people are still incredibly (and unreasonably) scared of nuclear power.
Would this thing have been better than the burning turd that the panther was?
>>3376049
What is this, some bizarro T-34?
>>3376061
a german ripoff of the T-34, looks cool i guess, but nothing could really save them, besides not starting the war in the first place
>>3376049
No.
>cramped, hinders crew performance
>weak armor even at the front, low survivability
>unreliable (the T-34 wasn't reliable like the M4)
The Panther was alright, after they figured out initial flaws (Version A and D were shit, Panther G was good). For the needs of Germany it was suitable (good ergonomics for the crew, strong frontal armor, strong anti-armor gun). It was still comparatively unreliable and not really suited as an infantry support tank, though.
Germany was on the defense against numerically superior enemy tanks, it didn't need an all-around tank like the M4, but essentially a tank destroyer, this role was filled by the Panther.
For offensive warfare, were a general purpose medium tank was required, the later versions of the Panzer IV were still fine, being comparable to the M4 and T-34.