Srlsy, why are their flaggs all so simmilar? And a cross? Thats looks more christianic that something from the norse mythology
>go on google
>search "Why do Scandinavian countries have crosses on their flag?"
>get answer
But no instead you decide to come her because you are such an isolated depressed bitch you need to talk to people about a dumb topic that nobody cares about.
If capitalism and markets are so efficient, why did the UK and Britain feel the need to basically enter a command economy to fight WW2?
>>3201134
>UK and Britain
>Uk and Britain
>uk and Britain
What form of monkhood is hardest?
Those Jains that starve themselves to death seem pretty hardcore
The Cathars had something similar where they starved to death to achieve liberation.
being a monk during the dissolution of the monasteries
Those Japanese monks who run nonstop for 1000 days or whatever.
Thoughts on Fiorello LaGuardia?
>>3201083
Terrible, terrible airport
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rockall
>The United Kingdom claimed and incorporated Rockall in 1955.
Was it autism?
It's what the british empire does. Go for land, no matter how shitty it is. Land is land.
>>3200966
>In May 2017, declassified documents revealed that the 1955 decision to claim the island as UK territory was motivated by worries that it could otherwise be used by "hostile agents" to spy on the future South Uist missile testing range.[64]
>>3200966
Anglos stealing Irish lands once again.
Will anybody stop them?
When we are able to 3D-print essentially atomically-perfect copies of paintings (capturing every dot of paint, every structure left by the brushes) - what will it mean for art?
When you download a perfect, to-the-brush-stroke, copy of the Mona Lisa on Pirate Bay, would you still go to the Louvre?
Is there inherent value in The Original when things are copyable to the atomical level? Would The Original even lose a portion of its value?
>>3200917
>atomically-perfect copies
you don't know what the fuck are you talking about
3D-printer is a glorified CNC ice cream press and it's never gonna be more than that.
People are still going to want to pay for original, hand drawn, authenticated organicâ„¢ art anyway.
I never understood mona lisa and the other expensive art works. What is so special about them? Why do people flock to see these paintings? I would ask them and they would say its the best art work out there. Is that really the case?
Historically which empires have been proportionately the wealthiest in comparison with their contemporary rivals?
>British Empire?
>Ottoman Empire?
>Persian Empire?
>American Empire?
>Something else?
ameriga > bridan > oddoman > persian
:--------DDD
pergamon
carthage
>>3200791
>1517
>20 years of Father Luther's new doctrines gave rise to 40 new sects
>Christendom fractured into theological rivalry via theological liberalism, aka protestantism
>200 years later
>hundreds of individual Christian sects all claiming to be the true Christian sect
>protestant principle of private interpretation infects all streams of thought, seeps into philosophy
>protestants disillusioned with the sectarian and subjective nature of protestantism begin a humanist philosophical revolution
>1717
>Masonic lodge founded in London based upon the egalitarian, Judaizing principles of Anabaptists and Jacobite/Whig revolutionaries
>Quickly abandon religious foundations and promote secularism and overthrow of authority, namely the authority of the Catholic Church and the Monarch
>Masonry uses Protestantism as a weapon against the foundational principles of Christendom: Catholicism
>Secularism rises
>1776
>America founded
>First secular, godless nation on planet earth in recorded human history
>1789, French revolution
>Protestant private interpretation altered philosophy and manifested itself in political realm in the actual overthrow of altar and throne
>Christendom destroyed
>Today
>American Protestants hail the rise of the secular republics as the "best government on earth" and "protected by God"
>200 years of secularism has led to children confused as to which bathroom to use
>Classical liberalism has spread into all facets of the world stage, including the hierarchy of its natural enemy: the Catholic Church
>"Conservatives" wonder how we got here, but still say "We need to get back to the Constitution and everything will be ok"
What a mentally deficient post.
>>3200870
cringe
>>3200870
>Masonic lodge founded in London based upon the egalitarian
They were founded by Catholics, only later partially adopting Anglicanism in response to the Hannoverian monarchy persecuting Catholics who showed dissent. It never stopped being quite Catholic. Especially in Scotland and Ireland.
>>3200877
Seconded.
This is all land historically owned by Sweden (excluding colonies)
>>3200834
I think you might be exaggerating a little bit
>>3200834
pfffffffffffffffffffffff
>>3200834
Are you from the parallel universe where Charles XII was actually successful and not a total idiot?
What happened in the last 35 years that made China (and India to a lesser extent) have an explosive economic growth?
>>3200767
they became factories of the whole goddamn planet, are you seriously not aware of this?
>>3200795
>they became factories of the whole goddamn planet, are you seriously not aware of this?
That's it? That's all it took?
>>3200767
They liberalised
Is philosophy the root of science? Are all science and scientifical progresses inherently tied to philosphy? Could science exist without philosophy? Could philosophy exist without science?
>Could science exist without philosophy?
No, you can't prove science with science itself, you need some epistemological basis for it. For example, you can't solve the problem of induction without involving some metaphysics.
>Could philosophy exist without science?
Well, it did for centuries.
>>3200723
>Is philosophy the root of science?
sort of
>Are all science and scientifical progresses inherently tied to philosphy?
depends on the angle you're trying to push here
>Could science exist without philosophy?
no
>Could philosophy exist without science?
it did
Science and philosophy used to be the same thing.
>never read a single philosophy author, always wrote my essays based on Wikipedia and Stanford entries
>still often on top of my tryhard class
>>3200743
Then why do you waste time and money on a worth less degree, if you're not even going to learn anything?
Same. Wikipedia and youtube are fucking great.
You can see there's a pattern with the British empire and their colonies. They only settled where the most primitive people lived, Australia with it's aborigines, America with the Indian savages.
They couldn't properly replace the people of Egypt or India for example.
>>3200652
Very ignorant post but too lazy to tell you why
>>3200658
Sure thing Nigel
>>3200652
I find it interesting you didn't mention a single thing about population density
I am trying to find information on pic related.
Its supposed to depict two Irish champions fighting one on one combat.
Was dual wielding actually used in medieval Ireland / Scotland?
Theres also this (bad) example.
In the movie Macbeth (2015) some of the (Scottish) warriors use a Sword and a short sword in some combat situations.
Was it really like this?
I couldn't find much online, so hopefully somebody will answer.
>Two Irish champions
Judging by those helmets I don't think that is who they are meant to be. The guy on the right has a Vendal helmet and the guy on the left has a late Roman style helmet.
Diversity in the whermact is up for debate on hitlers true intentions. If hitler would have won would he had gotten rid of their countries or let them go peacefully just dictating their land based on what he wanted. So /his/ what would have hitler done with these people?
>>3200604
Killed them, they are not Aryan
>>3200604
He hated all semites. He would definitely have tried to kill them. He believed Aryans were automatically better than semites.
>>3200611
Not true at all it was the wealthy Jews who funded the commies and controlled the banking system leading to inflation in germany and what he called degeneracy in berlin. And he couldve used these people in factories and supplied them with jobs and flourished their economy and his. But that is debatable on whether he could use them!