Archived threads in /his/ - History & Humanities - 3858. page

For the health and well being of the nation and people

>They are German and we are English, therefore our views and our methods on many subjects will be different. In this particular we possess a great Empire comprising many different races. They possess no such Empire, and their aim is a revived German race, geographically united. We believe profoundly in our own British race which has created the Empire, but we know also it would be bad for the Empire to stigmatise by law other races within it as inferior or outcast
>Fascism is the name by which the modern Movement has come to be known in the world. It would have been possible to avoid
>misrepresentation by calling our Movement by another name. But it was more honest to call it Fascism and thus to let everyone know exactly where we stood. It is up to us to defeat misrepresentation by propaganda and explanation of the real policy and methods of Fascism as it will operate in Britain. In the long run straightforward dealing is not only honest but also pays best. The alternative name for the modern Movement is the National Socialism used in Germany. But the German Movement also is known throughout the outside world as Fascist, which is the name commonly used to describe the phenomenon of the modern Movement whether in Britain, Germany or Italy. National Socialism and Fascism in my view are the same Movement, finding different expressions in different countries in accord with different national and racial characteristics. For seven years in the Labour Party before founding Fascism in Britain, I fought for a National Socialist Policy in contradistinction to the International Socialism of that Party.
>>Oswald Mosley (1936) Fascism: 100 questions asked and answered

>>886862
he still doesnt tell me what fascism is gb

I bet he fucked the Empress and all her daughters.

He probably 'experimented' with the Tsarevich too when 'healing' his groin injury.

>>886693
the answer lies in his eyes

Ra-Ra-Rasputin lover of the Russian queen.

I don't see why he was an important person apart from being living propaganda against the Tsar.

>>886660
>Look, if you had one shot, or one opportunity to erase original sin. In one moment would you martyrdom, or just let it slip?

An omnipotent GOD can do that anytime.

File: So cash.png (1MB, 680x510px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 680x510px

>>886660
Snap back to Gethsemane
Oh, He goes heavenly
Oh, there goes Peter
He smote he's so mad but he won't give up that easy
No He won't have it, He knows His whole back's to these beams
It don't matter, He's clean
He knows that but He's broke
He's so sad that He knows
When he goes back to His heavenly abode that's when it's
Back to His Dad again, yo
This whole rhapsody
He better go capture this moment and hope it don't pass him

You better lose yourself in the Atonement, the moment, you own it,
You better never let it go
You only get one shot do not miss your chance to be made whole
This crucifixion comes once in a lifetime

can we acknowledge that Jesus is a rap master psalmist? "Father, why have you forsaken me? I know you haven't bruh, jk. I just love dat psalm 22."

>>886497
This kind of armor thread would be better on /tg/ if you care about look more than function.

>>886556

Isn't that the Polish Hussar armor?

File: Katakombenheiliger_pankratius.jpg (669KB, 1620x2288px) Image search: [Google]

669KB, 1620x2288px

St. Pancratius
boo

The Middle East would be better if it was still a pluralist single state

File: 1906_John_David_Rees_MP.jpg (169KB, 423x528px) Image search: [Google]

169KB, 423x528px

I found this speech yesterday when researching something else, it's from a 1920 House of Commons speech by Sir J.D. Rees.

http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/commons/1920/jun/23/mesopotamia-1#S5CV0130P0_19200623_HOC_354

>My right hon. Friend (Major-General Seely) in his speech has overlooked the fact that there is really no such person as a Mesopotamian. He spoke of Mesopotamians as if they were a nationality and were united. I venture to submit that they are, in point of fact, composed of the inhabitants of three cities which have very little affinity, and certain loosely connected tribes. Those tribes are said to be very friendly to us, partly owing to the services, which I am sure I do not under-estimate, of Colonel Lawrence, but I can remember that they were extremely friendly towards another colonel on a former occasion until they took his life.

>It is true that my right hon. Friend and others have counted to a considerable extent on the friendship of the Arabs because of their hostility to the Turks. Their hostility to the Turks simply comes from the fact that the Turks were their governors. The Turks governed them easily, loosely, spasmodically. It was the easiest yoke in the world, but the Arabs hated them, because they hate any yoke...They are in no sense Mesopotamians, and we cannot count at all upon their friendship in the manner which has been suggested in this Debate.

>Just in proportion as government is good government, so far will it be hateful to the Arabs. What we consider good government is exactly what they abhor, and they will hate us if we impose upon them anything like civilised Western administration far more than they hated the Turk. In point of fact, their hatred of the Turk was purely of a professional character, in the same way as an Irishman will write himself down against the Government, wherever he is, and whatever the government.

[1/2]

>>886683

>The same is the case with the Arab nomads, and they are, I think, the majority of the population of this region which we roughly call Mesopotamia. They will the more dislike us the more of our money we spend in imposing upon them a civilised administration.We threw every kind of modern learning at the Hindus, and created in them a love of advanced democratic administration; but there is nothing of the sort amongst the Arabs, and I hope we shall not add to our embarrassments by wasting our money in the vague, foolish, and, as I think, odious effort to impose our own views of what is good administration on nomad tribes and on the inhabitants of these three cities in Mesopotamia. Let us give them material advantages, but let us not endeavour to interfere with the psychology of the Arab people

>My hon. Friend the Member for Stafford said we should train the Mesopotamians in order to be able to withdraw the Indian troops, but again I do not understand what he meant by Mesopotamians. Who are the Mesopotamians that he suggests should be regulated and made into disciplined soldiers? Is it the desert tribes, who hate one another and unite in nothing else but in disliking one another until somebody else tries to govern them all, when they hate him more than they hate one another?

>I want to protest that no sooner shall we be installed as governors of the Arabs than, unless we draw government very mild, we shall be far more unpopular with them than ever the Turks were, whose yoke was light, although occasionally they came out with guns and swords to collect their taxes. I hope what I have said about the extreme advisability and absolute necessity of avoiding anything like what we call good government, and letting these people go on managing their own affairs, will be acted upon by the Government.

>>886313
Sin is not a created thing.

>>886313
Further, nothing you listed is a sin.

>>886345
If it is not created, then it is also uncreated and therefore, eternal. Christians believe God created everything present in the universe ex nihilo. This is a serious blow to God's claims of omnipotence, if there is something that exists that he did not create.

Read: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tabor_Light#Hesychast_controversy

It's not the same exact thing, but it is close.

>>886019
They aren't

>>886019
They want in on that sweet Mongol prestige but in all honesty all they did was join the Mongols when they took shit over, no different from the Buryats or the Merkits

>>885991
irrelevant, poopland would be raped anyway

he was getting senile anyway

like with all glorious dictators, his students were either worthless or edgelords hell-bent on opposing his every idea

File: 1457471581853.jpg (76KB, 633x738px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 633x738px

>>886008
Lol

Epic

"Religion is a scam because God can't be real because it is opposit if what laws of physics say and I will happy to say otherwise if I see proof but I don't see it the world is based on proof it's the only thing that advances us and we can colonize planets if Christians go away we will have new medicines and cure cancer if weed is legal

>In some remote corner of the universe, poured out and glittering in innumerable solar systems, there once was a star on which clever animals invented knowledge. That was the highest and most mendacious minute of 'world history' - yet only a minute. After nature had drawn a few breaths the star grew cold, and the clever animals had to die.
>One might invent such a fable and still not have illustrated sufficiently how wretched, how shadowy and flighty, how aimless and arbitrary, the human intellect appears in nature. There have been eternities when it did not exist; and when it is done for again, nothing will have happened. For this intellect has no further mission that would lead beyond human life. It is human, rather, and only its owner and producer gives it such importance, as if the world pivoted around it. But if we could communicate with the mosquito, then we would learn that he floats through the air with the same self-importance, feeling within itself the flying center of the world. There is nothing in nature so despicable or insignificant that it cannot immediately be blown up like a bag by a slight breath of this power of knowledge; and just as every porter wants an admirer, the proudest human being, the philosopher, thinks that he sees on the eyes of the universe telescopically focused from all sides on his actions and thoughts.

>>885656
I don't know if aliens but I think it were aliens.

>>885656
some niggas from atlantis prob

>>885656
Probably bunch of people decided to build it to show off their skills or something

>>885433
no

>>885433
yes

>>885433
No, it doesn't. But we're humans, so we're naturally drawn towards creating, postulating, and conceptualizing gods.

How could we possibly answer that?

How could anyone pinpoint the exact edict that began the fall?

>>885417
Mixed bathing began the fall of Rome.

It certainly didn't help.

File: louis.jpg (24KB, 615x349px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 615x349px

LITTLE

>>885129
most people are hedonistic and love their hedonism. hedonistic people live through entertainment, which brings the most pleasures with the least discomfort. hedonism is the nihilism and most people rely on their speculations about the future, from the past experiences, to enhance their hedonism.

I thought MDE was making fun of alt-righters but then I saw his interview with Fantano and it turns out he really is retarded.

>>885002
What's with all of these bums on /his/ today?

Fat asses were a sign of being well fed which meant the family was rich.

"fit" girls meant they worked. Generally because they needed money. Which meant the family wasnt rich and thus not desirable.

File: Steatopygia.jpg (18KB, 278x400px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 278x400px

>>885002
Fat was loved for its representative value of caloric abundance and reservoir for breastfeeding children.

File: Washington DC - Jefferson Memorial.jpg (30KB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 320x240px

>>884899
We even have the same obsession with psuedo-Roman iconography.

>>884899
>we're the only ones who use the term this way
Germany, Australia, and several others refers to them as states.

File: Fasces-Congress-Obama.jpg (185KB, 1000x692px) Image search: [Google]

185KB, 1000x692px

>>884913
I'm sure there's an explanation (perhaps that it's the only common way to represent governmental power without using the symbolism of a crown yet still have a recognizable historical appeal), but it just seems kind of try-hard and imitative when I look at it with fresh eyes.