Why is Communism so easy to break? Communism only lasted for as long as Lenin was alive in the USSR, because after that Stalin came in and turned it into a murder house which after that just became a boogeyman. China is the worst example, they demolished the old culture which the could have easily kept, it was probably due to the impact the second world war had on the citizens and that they wanted something new that the old government didn't. But the Chinese during the Cultural revolution killed a lot of people, most of them were just Tibetan monks and people who didn't agree with Mao, apparent in the amount of people he killed. I've only seen Communism work in places like Laos, where it's still technically a farming based culture. Even Vietnam is that way, the US only invaded due to the USSR's involvement in the revolution. We don't see massive uproars in places like Vietnam compared to China. Why is that so?
>>953966
Because command economies do not give everyone what they need, and therefore there will be scarcity.
/thread
>>953966
>see massive uproars in places like Vietnam
You mean like thousands of Southerners placed in reeducation camps?
Also Vietnam followed China's economic model you know.
>>953967
Need and want btw*, meant to put that as an edit.
If an all-knowing alien visited the earth and said that the polar opposite political belief is the way to true prosperity, would you embrace that belief?
>>951979
Frankly, probably not, I'd be too worried the aliens would be showing up to take over. And what better way to destroy a native population than to have them do it themselves.
Now, if they actually show some proof they're benevolent and just trying to help, sure, but I'd also be wary of trusting someone who's basically saying "Well it worked for me!" when my biggest complain with most ideologies is that they exist in a vacuum and setting that has never appeared before in human history. In case anyone was wondering, I'm fairly conservative and I don't see liberal ideologies ever working out long term as long as humans are humans in all their selfish, short sighted assholery.
Maybe.
>>951979
How do I know that the alien is all-knowing?
Need inspiration and like wot bog sends...
How do you go from OP's pic to ... this shit
>>945678
turks
>>945678
But hoplites also had mini skirts, and some were faggots too.
>hated mudskins
>hated big pharma
>hated greeks
>hated "degeneracy"
>extremely patriotic & jingoistic
>muh ancestors are spbeaging to me :DD
Was he the first Tea Party activist/ /pol/ack?
>Tea Party
I don't think the Bostonians who threw tea into the harbor that night hated "mudskins" that much, considering America's good relations with West African Muslim countries early on, disregarding (or even taking into account) the Barbary Wars.
Or are you breaking the 25-year rule?
>>987279
In what way is he breaking the 25 year rule my reddit friend?
He isn't asking about the history of the 2010 tea party, he's just comparing a guy from two millenia ago to a today's party so he can understand the situation better and mayhaps even draw parallels
>>987284
What?
The comparison breaks the rule.
The French settlers in America played a big role, founded many cities and states, but it feels like they're somehow forgotten by now. Many white Americans boast about their German, British, Irish or Polish heritage, but where are the French-Americans?
Is there any good literature about the works of French settlers in the USA? What about the Cajuns? Do they have a distinct culture or is their population size too small to be relevant?
>>986938
Because the French got btfo by the English. And this defeat was added to the long and growing list of pathetic French defeats.
Why would anyone be proud to be or celebrate these losers?
>>986938
>any white Americans boast about their German, British, Irish or Polish heritage, but where are the French-Americans?
In Canada
I've got some French in me
It's the worst part of my heritage
Why aren't there Protestant monasteries?
The leaders of the Reformation hated monasteries. Probably because of muh faith alone and all that.
What exactly is the point of monasteries?
>>986273
gay marriage
Can someone please explain why so many people cream about Rommel?
How brilliant of a tactician/strategist/commander was he? What battles stand out?
I never heard of anything concrete that demonstrates his over-hypeness.
Check out The Great War's episode on his actions in WWI, he's pretty based
>>985820
He is mainly over hyped because he launched his invasion of Egypt early, in summer 1942, when he was supposed to wait 3 months so that the Axis could capture Malta, better securing Axis supply lines in North Africa. Instead, he decided to press his advantage and invade Egypt. After his gamble failed, he whined a lot about how his troops weren't getting enough supplies and he needed more tanks and oil, even though the Axis was trying to get these to him, but the ships were being sunk because.... the paratroopers that were going to be used to capture Malta had to be diverted to help Rommel, and the supply lines couldn't be secured.
He was a very good general, as shown during the battle of France and the North Africa campaign. Every general makes mistakes though, so yeah.
>>985820
He was a top 10 German general, but not a top 5. Overall overrated.
ITT: Stuff that happened in the past that makes you feel sad for some reason.
Pic relatec
>>985285
A few years in a comfy white collar Federal Prison ain't worth blowing your brains out over even if you were framed.
>>985669
it was the principle of the matter
>>985285
>some reason
Because getting framed for something and killing yourself over it on live T.V. fucking blows, maybe?
Why did philosophy of mind stagnate?
Despite all the progress in neuroscience, philosophy mind has made no progress towards explaining consciousness. The debate of dualism vs physicalism as well as the open question of the nature of qualia remain unresolved, and basically modern philosophers of mind are adding nothing new, but merely rephrase old arguments and thought experiments from several decades ago. No new insights are to be seen, only dogmatics who are unwilling to seek a compromise.
Is philosophy of mind a dead field? Or is there still a small chance that (by a rare coincidence) a new philosophical genius will revolutionize the field with an insightful idea never thought before?
>>984115
>qualia
This word just sort of makes me nauseous whenever I see it now, even though I used to find it fascinating.
>>984123
That sounds like an interesting experience, thank you for trying to share it with us.
>>984123
i don't know that qualia, bro
Is it true that "feudalism" was never actually a thing?
>>983799
and a non-noble non-peasant and non-knightly class and you've got a thing.
>>983799
where the hell have you heard that.
It is almost inevitable for an agrarian society to evolve into a feudal society, especially post-Roman societies.
To maintain an empire the size of Charlemagne's for example, feudalism was a requirement.
>>983813
What? I don't care about the struggle of the proletariat, it just happens unless the society is influenced by another that has progressed past feudalism.
It is the only logistical way for a society to function during those time periods, even China ran the exact same way.
Does anybody have that cartoon about colonization of Africa? It was Europeans forcing alcohol into an African, whose shitting out gold, a European eating an African, and other stuff. I don't know it's name and can't find it, anybody have it? Pic unrelated
>>983476
Great thread OP. Really good place for discussion.
>>983573
Fucking revisionists hating on colonialism.
Who was the worst king in English History?
>English history
Haha. Les bains?
Henry VI
There's no other correct answer. There were plenty of tyrants, but this guy was an absolute nullity and England paid the price. Shame because his father was a champion.
Aethelred was pretty shit, but I'd agree that it would have to go to Henry VI.
Other close runners up are Stephen, John, Henry III and Richard II
If the 4th Crusade never happened what are the Byzantine's chances of pulling off a Reconquista?
Dandolo did absolutely nothing wrong
>>981288
What game? EU4?
>>981327
CK2 /gsg/ at /vg/ has all of it in a Mega.
>https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2016/04/12/scholars-who-study-hinduism-and-india-face-hostile-climate
>Disputes over alleged mischaracterizations of Hinduism and India by Western scholars are long simmering and boil over from time to time. This happened in 2005-6, when Hindu groups battled with scholars over proposed revisions to descriptions of the religion in California middle school textbooks.
Reading this article and the comment section of this article, I had no idea Hindus were so pissed off at Indology academics. On one hand, some of these Hindu groups seem to have a point that Western scholars of India are overtly negative and have misinterpreted texts. On the other hand, the Hindu groups also seem to be pushing blatant falsehoods such as the idea that there was no Aryan migration to India. So I'm not sure who's in the right here, but I'm leaning towards that the Hindu groups are just butthurt nationalists.
What's /his/'s take on Western scholarship on Indian history? Do these Hindu groups make a good argument?
There's no chance whatsoever this is comparable to Religious right Muslims or Christians raging at people for asserting a secular stance mainly based on what the archaeological and historical sources say rather than the Religious ones?
>>982735
It definitely is, but in the case of Indology it's also tied in with post-colonialism. As in, are Western academics still viewing India from a colonial perspective and are either purposefully or unintentionally degrading India?
>>982719
It's anecdotal evidence but whatever; we had a lecture by Indian ambassador on his country in my university. It was generally okay but man, did he dive into some WE WUZ shit at times.
>We invented geometry and shiet several thousand years BC
>Except Western fucks don't trust oral sources
>Fucking Western fucks
>Vedas are basically ancient textbooks
>They have the speed of light incorporated in them and shiet
Someone just told me that Jesus never created a new religion. Which Bible verses indicate the contrary?
>>981654
No. Paul did.
None of them. Christianity arose after his death and was spread by the apostles. >>981654
We need to define ''religion''.