How did they do that? What was their secret?
>>3217165
Many, many horses
>"dude like just obey the law fuck you"
Whoa....Hobbes was truly one of the greatest philosophers to ever exist.
>>3217074
This is true of most western philosophers -- masters of wit and rhetoric, but they offer little substance beyond common sensical notions.
To truly tap into wisdom, you must look towards the East.
>Hobbes is a jaded Louis CK clone tank derivative who got to time travel and retire as a philosopher
>>3217083
>"dude like just respect your parents lol"
Whoa....Confucius was truly one of the greatest philosophers to ever exist
>80% of your army is horse drawn
>decide to take on your mechanized neighbours
What did they mean by this?
>>3217057
>Europe is relatively peaceful and united in religion
>decide to shit on 1500 years of history
What did they mean by this?
>>3217064
The Eternal G*rman strikes again.
>>3217064
>catholic church brutally suppresses the Cathars and Hussites
>acts surprised when the next christian reform movement is militantly anti-catholic
what did they mean by this?
How the hell am I to know 1940s slang?
http://quizzes.howstuffworks.com/quiz/its-time-sandpaper-the-anchor-world-war-ii-lingo
Does it hold up when given the (currently accepted) fact that sentient life can only develop as far as to know it is irrevocably doomed by the same universe fine tuned to create it? Entropy and all that.
Unless vacuum energy can actually be put to work, but that's not currently physically possible.
>>3216939
nothing generational ships cannot cure
>>3217010
Generational ships don't outrun heat death, Anon.
Now if there is no Big Rip, you might be able to sci-fi rig up some sort of stasis chambers that doesn't wake humanity until there's another big bang/entropy reversal event.
/ourguys/
>>3216936
Maybe 15 years ago, they're Jodie now.
>>3217583
right? what the hell happened? it's so fucking weird I have trouble understanding what concept kids these days make of stuff like this: it's supposed to symbolize the highest standards in knowledge. and is just defiled like this.
>>3216936
hitler and aliens
What is it about love that drives us to it?
Even the wisest, strongest, and most intelligent men can be brought to their knees in the pursuit of love. It has the ability to make our lives seemingly perfect, if only for a short while, but also the potential to tear us apart and leave us as empty, soulless husks.
Love is sublime suffering. When your lover is present, you are happy -- fuck everything else, she is the only thing that matters. When she is gone, you feel extreme pain and want. If only she could be there to satisfy your longing; even to just see her is enough to erase your pain. But it is also the source of that pain.
Why? Why do the wise among us feel the drive to love and be loved? Even when adhering to the strictest asceticism, the need for love persists. Even when the games and pretty lights no longer entertain us and we are close to being detached from the world, love draws us back in.
What is its nature? What is its value? And why do I want it, even knowing the pain it brings?
Is this another Anne Frank thread?
>>3216898
But love is a spook :^)
>>3216937
>QueerVanguard
>Poly
http://www.shamash.org/lists/scj-faq/HTML/faq/17-03.html
How do Christians go about convincing Jews that Jesus is the messiah when there is so much evidence to suggest otherwise?
>>3216880
>How do Christians go about convincing Jews that Jesus is the messiah...
?
THE "MESSIAH" OF THE JEWS IS THE DAJJAL/ANTICHRIST; JESUS IS THE "MESSIAH" OF CHRISTIANS, AND OF MOHAMMEDANS.
>>3216880
Interesting question. What is it about Jesus that the Jews think make him incompatible with their interpretation of the teachings of "G-d".
>>3216926
Because the Jewish religion is based around rejecting Christ. Jews that accepted Christ in the early days of the religion are called Christians.
Is this a nasal helmet with faceguard or an early form of enclosed helmet?
Why are we so hung up on /pol/ and /leftypol/ when it's shit like this ruining the board
>>3216592
>>3216641
It is /pol/ subhumans spamming that.
Prove me wrong
Why did the Qing dynasty cede land to russian?
>>3216522
They didn't?
Manchuria had some sort of weird status as still being Chinese territory under Russian Hegemony, who were building railroads all over the place.
The formal acquisition by Russia of Qing territory was Vladivostok.
>>3216522
Longstanding Russian interest in the Amur region, plus opportunism following China's weakness around the same time of the Opium War. That's just me speaking in ignorance from the Wikipedia page though. If anyone has details beyond wiki, I'd love to know more.
>>3216549
The treaty of Aigun gave co-dominium over large parts of the Amur region (maybe not "Manchuria" proper), but they got full posession of it just a few years later, and got the maritime region at the Conference of Beijing in 1860.
>moot said we shouldn't have a /his/ board because it would turn into /pol/ 2.0
>thought he was just being an uptight faggot
>he was right all along
>>3216489
its the humanities part that ruins it.
If the 25-year rule was strictly enforced, it'd be fine.
>>3216489
Shut the fuck up you (((cuckniggershilltrannydildolickerdykeretardassbaby))) (((cuckniggershilltrannydildolickerdykeretardassbabies)))don't have opinions worth listening to, so you should just kill yourself like the rest of the (((cuckniggershilltrannydildolickerdykeretardassbabies)))
>>3216489
Not /his/ but rather humanities
How could the magyars, steppeniggers from Siberia, oppress and rule over millions of Slavs, Germans, Jews and Romanians?
They feared the Hun warrior
How could the Turk, steppeniggers from Siberia, oppress and rule over millions of Anatolians, Greeks, Persians and Egyptians?
or alternatively
How could the Proto-Indo-Europeans, steppeniggers from Siberia, oppress and rule over millions of Mesopotamians, Dravidians, Neolithic Farmers and Indigenous European Hunter Gatherers?
>>3216468
> Steppeniggers
What did he mean by this?
Has there ever been a happy polymath? Or are they always miserable? Totally asking for a friend.
I showed you my inventions now answer me.
>>3216356
someone being a "polymath" arguably displays elements of mania and an unbalanced personality, while likely having unusual social relationships. I don't think they're all necessarily unhappy but by virtue of it being considered quite outside of the norm, even among "gifted" individuals, it's likely to come with a lot of odd behavioral traits.
I do find that a lot of my own friends and acquittances that pursued careers in academia have really big egos and are surprisingly focused on social attention more so than the subjects they work in. I'm not calling them shallow, just that they do care quite a bit about how people perceive them to an extent they're almost constantly unhappy. Someone diving into multiple subjects, and this is purely my opinion, is probably quite like this and worse
>>3218632
>someone being a "polymath" arguably displays elements of mania and an unbalanced personality
>Being good at many things means you're crrrrrazy
I sense jealousy in this post.
>unbalanced personality
>unbalanced
>Literally the opposite
>it's likely to come with a lot of odd behavioral traits.
Now that I will concede. Polymaths are incredibly rare, even among geniuses, but I really don't see why that should mean they should have to be isolated. Of course, I also see why they couldn't find much common ground with other humans.
>Someone diving into multiple subjects, and this is purely my opinion, is probably quite like this and worse
This is wrong. Single-field focusers are attention whores because they're plebs. Even the "experts" are typically morons. Polymaths just don't have much time outside of their pursuits for attention whoring.