Who are your favorite and least favorite American presidents, and why?
fave
TR
unfave
obama bin laden
FAVORITE
Coolidge because he was like me and he believed in personal liberties
LEAST FAVORITE
FDR for failing against Great Depression and in his policies during WWII
But we could argue that Wilson's presidency was more disastrous to the world.
>>1062044
Fave Nixon because I love all the films that were made about him
Least fave Jefferson because autism and hypocrisy
ITT we justify atrocities. Post your favourite genocide, war crime, mass murder or any other thing and justify it.
>In the 13th century the Mongols conquered modern day Iraq and destroyed their irrigation system leading to great loss in productive capacity.
Iraqis had it coming and the Mongols really did them a favour, like a father disciplining a child.
The fertile cresent used to be covered in lush forests, but being irresponsible, the population destroyed the forests and desertified the land leading to a collapse, Destruction of their irrigation canals helped them adopt a more responsible mode of production.
> Genocide
Aboriginal Tasmanians
> Justification
Aboriginal people are vile
>>1034145
Firebombing of Dresden.
You all know why.
the actions against Hereros and Namas in Namibia 1904 were actually quite justified because the indigenous behaved like savage animals
Ask a guy whose girlfriend just sold my $1,800 leaf from a 14th century manuscript at our garage sale for $10 anything
Yes, I am dead inside, next question. No, I will never trust a woman with sorting out which antiques are okay to sell and which aren't again, next question.
pic related is not the leaf in question
>>1067530
This is entirely your fault for not taking proper care of valuable artifacts. You are a moron and should be ashamed
Why didn't you keep it in a safe?
>>1067535
It was literally framed, with an engraving underneath the leaf stating "ILLUMINATION FROM BOOK OF HOURS, 14th CENTURY GERMANY OR ITALY"
Did medieval soldiers suffer from PTSD? If they did are there any historical accounts of it? I've only ever heard it talked about in the context of modern warfare.
>>1064007
It was probably very rare if it happened ever. Medieval warfare and before was much slower than the rapid warfare of WW1 and on. There also weren't any weapons which could cause a spontaneous change in the senses like artillery could, which is the cause of shellshock.
Shakespeare's Hotspur clearly has it, so the idea was not unknown to a 16th century audience.
You'd just get branded as a coward and get ridiculed or just die when they send you to front lines
I've recently become fascinated by the Thracians,what can /his/ tell me about them other than the fact that they were /fa/ as fuck?
>pic related, dem cloaks
>>1061606
dat shield
>:3
>>1062202
Seem like they were pretty shit warriors.
What's the dumbest thing you've heard history related? Mine is when a teacher asked who was president in 1956 and someone legitimately answered Lincoln, not as a joke.
>>1052844
>The Gospels were written by Jesus.
I'm not trying to start an atheist vs Christian debate shitfling here, but I had a HS teacher in all seriousness tell the class that all 4 gospels were attributed to Jesus of Nazareth, and looked confused when someone asked why they had 4 different names then.
>>1052844
Chick in 9th grade with me didn't know who the Nazis were.
>>1052844
"America won the Civil War."
I don't understand why this is so hard for protestants to understand. Can someone please explain to me why?
Gee I wonder why Luther tried to remove James.
>>1065841
this
>>1065809
I am not religious so I am assuming some definitions here. "Faith with works," I am assuming means belief in God through faith with the addition of prayer, following the commandments, going to church, etc. That is, someone who believes works are necessary for salvation would believe that faith is not sufficient for salvation. "Faith without works," I am going to assume means belief in God through faith without the addition of prayer, following the commandments, going to church, etc. That is, someone who believes works are not necessary for salvation would believe that faith is sufficient for salvation.
So to take up the defense of "faith without works" I will propose that faith itself is works. In this way, I would be supporting "faith with works" but in a way very much different than my definition for "faith with works."
Demons believe in God, but they do so for very different reasons than people do. Demons do not need faith as they themselves are proof of God. That is, demons only exist if God exists. I am also assuming that demons have most likely seen God, or the Devil, or have otherwise been involved in things that prove to them that God exists. A person, on the other hand, does not have proof of God. He must tackle his inability to prove God's existence through rationale and empirical evidence. This, I say, is itself a work and worthy of salvation.
I find throughout history that there are often different groups of people mentioned as important forces in some part of history. But after mentioning them, the book transfers into a more state-wise and less ethnic based viewpoint. By the time ethnicity is acknowledged again, everything about the situation is different.
Early Middle Ages, all sorts of Germanic peoples everywhere, Franks, Goths, Saxons, etc. But the textbook starts focusing on Charlemagne or whatever, and the people largely go unmentioned, and soon enough we're discussing Germans, French people, Italians, with completely different ethnic borders. What caused the change?
In addition, some groups just seemingly appear. How did eastern Europe become full of Slavs? Was it like that even in Roman times, or am I missing something?
How does this happen?
>>1070893
bumped for interest
>>1070915
Thanks mate, but I doubt my thread is gonna get much replies. As far as I know, the peasantry of the middle ages, who were often ruled by people of a completely different ethnicity, are poorly documented. I wonder if the reason is solely because of Romans documenting the early peoples well, but the documentation falls apart afterwards
>>1070893
Hyperboreans losing grip on their Atlantic connection with the divine.
Give me one good reason not to be an egalitarian that isn't edgy, retarded, or chalked up to semantics
Pic highly related
>>1070897
that's utilitarianism
not egalitarianism
get your ism's right
>>1070907
Ayy you're right. My bad
Still a funny pic though.
>The notion of progress in the historical sense assumes the existence of a stable and consistent viewpoint. However, since our viewpoint is constantly shifting in time, it's impossible to completely evaluate the new state of affairs objectively and to compare it with the past. The only possible way we could morally evaluate our era in comparison with the past is if we find an actual living being from the past, transfer them to the present and ask them what they think; since this is impossible, the notion of progress should be discarded.
How do you respond to this?
"Progress" is a lie, this is nothing new.
I like Dinosaur Comics
>>1068871
It's a pretty good argument. Progress is a very dubious notion.
Why were socialist ideas so strong with german navy? I was under impression army was mostly conservative.
The officers were in fact conservative, but lower-rank soldiers were not.
why were socialist ideas welcomed by the lower classes? i don't know it's a mystery
>>1066077
Socialism is a system where upper middle class intellectuals exploit the lower class into bloody revolution to put then in power, then massacre and oppress said lower class. Happened every time. Wish I could say there was an exception. I really do.
>The English civil war has just begun
>You are a minor nobleman
>Will you declare for Charles the 1st and back the royalist cause?
>Or will you take up arms against your King and back Cromwell and the other parliamentarians.
>Roundhead or Cavalier
What do /his/?
>>1065855
Roundhead of course
>>1065905
>Not backing your rightful king
Wew
>choice between absolute monarchy and religious theocracy
No thanks. I'm off to the New World.
How revolutionary was the American revolution?
>american revolution
>power structures are the same post war
>>1063886
dumb anime poster
You go from farmers being ruled by a King on the other side of the ocean to an elected monarch ruling from the other side of the country
That's it lads, I got it right.
>>1063787
Literally the cuck for which Zizek came up with the dusty balls of capitalism joke.
>>1064059
What joke?
>>1064211
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=80X0pbCV_t4
What is this?
Go to bed Bertrand
A teapot.
>>1062769
Interesring query. Is it a teapot? Or merely an image of a teapot? Moreover, what decides whether something is a teapot? We do? Wouldn't that mean we humans have some mystical power to give something its essence? We say something is and it is.
I'm hungry.