Archived threads in /his/ - History & Humanities - 3646. page

Not this shit again, seriously.
>muh lack of meaning
>muh "life goals"
>muh suffering
It's easy, you get to choose: Be a madcunt or be a sadcunt. Did Zyzz not teach you anything.

Life isn't that bad holy shit stop being such a little bitch

File: 1434510535606.jpg (124KB, 560x897px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 560x897px

>>1101618
>not this again
Yeah I know, at least it's not theism vs atheism

>don't be a sadcunt
So one becomes a sickunt just to become a sickunt?

Are these threads necessary?

Suleiman
Constantine

>>1101339
Alaric

I'm on Netflix looking for actual informative documentaries rn, they're actually pretty hard to find. It's all "killer legends" and "Atari: game over" and shit like that

>>1101261
There was a three part BBC documentary on Napoleon a few months ago. Can't remember what it was called, but it was pretty good.

>>1101261
Rome Rise and Fall of an Empire (there are two different versions, both are decent)

Decisive Battles - uses rome total war for the animations, pretty fun

>>1101199
It sure helps speed it up.

File: proof.png (33KB, 899x547px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 899x547px

>>1101210

>>1101199
most dickmeasuring contests are

File: american gladiator.png (929KB, 1051x585px) Image search: [Google]

929KB, 1051x585px

You must be at least this American to compete.

>>1101033
Not very. It plays out more like a bar room brawl between two drunk gangs kicking and punching each other chaotically then a clash between two trained groups of fighters using deadly weapons to kill or incapacitate each other.

>>1101033
medieval combat in armor was a lot of stabbing at weak points
If someone would go into short distance as careless as these guys doing LARP wrestling, they'd have the tip of a pike or sword in an uncomfortable spot

File: image.jpg (38KB, 275x700px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 275x700px

No fuckng line infantry's gonna out dress the cav.

File: Schwarze_Schar_1809.jpg (56KB, 510x800px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 510x800px

>>1100984

Gothic architecture is the cloisterlike and overcomplex reflection of a sordid soul.

S Tier: Burgos
A Tier: Toledo, Sevilla, León, Santiago
B Tier: Cordoba, Jaen, Salamanca, Oviedo, Mallorca, Zaragoza, Segovia, Avila
C Tier: Barcelona, Valencia, Murcia, Granada, Plasencia, La Calzada, Sigüenza
D Tier: Valladolid, Cuenca, all not named
E Tier: Madrid

>>1100873
Sagrada Senpaiília

File: B0acf80da3c8e8edda166279826d39f2.jpg (119KB, 637x826px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 637x826px

Slimy Slavic rape babies not living up to their promises

Nighty night, Byzantines

Why did the Crusaders attack a Christian city?

>>1100712
do you mean because they fled constantinople during the siege instead of staying to defend?

>>1100688
>Who was a better leader?

MUHAMMAD ALI JINNAH.

>Who was right?

DEFINE "BEING RIGHT".

>Who was a better person?

FROM WHAT I CAN INFER, MUHAMMAD ALI JINNAH.

>Who was a bigger revolutionary?

MUHAMMAD ALI JINNAH.

>And which country turned out better?

GENERALLY, PAKISTAN.

INCIDENTALLY, HAS ANYONE ELSE BEEN EXPERIENCING PAKISTAN SYNCHRONICITIES FOR THE LAST ONE TO TWO DAYS? FOR THE LAST DAY AND A HALF I HAVE BEEN SEEING DIRECT, AND INDIRECT, REFERENCES TO PAKISTAN; I EVEN WATCHED THE "MOVIE" "JINNAH" (1998).

>>1100731
By right I mean what would be better, a united India of the partition

>>1100737

MOHANDAS GANDHI WAS IN FAVOUR OF AGGLOMERATING PEOPLES INTO AN HETEROGENEOUS NATION, ALONG SOCIOPOLITICAL LINES, EXPECTING INTERNAL CONFLICTS TO RESOLVE BY THEMSELVES VIA THE PREPONDERANCE OF A MAJORITARIAN SOCIOPOLITICAL CONSENSUS; ID EST: DEMOCRACY, OR TYRANNY OF THE MAJORITY.

MUHAMMAD ALI JINNAH WAS IN FAVOUR OF SECESSION ONLY AFTER RECOGNIZING THAT THE RADICALITY OF IDEALISTIC DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE TWO MAJOR GROUPS WITHIN THE NATIONALISTIC MOVEMENT MADE THEIR MUTUAL CONFLICT VIRTUALLY UNSOLVABLE.

MOHANDAS GANDHI WAS A "USEFUL IDIOT"; MUHAMMAD ALI JINNAH WAS AN AUTHENTIC NATIONALIST.

MOHANDAS GANDHI IS TO MARTIN LUTHER KING JUNIOR WHAT MUHAMMAD ALI JINNAH IS TO MALCOLM X.

MOHANDAS GANDHI IS TO THOMAS EDISON WHAT MUHAMMAD ALI JINNAH IS TO NIKOLA TESLA.

MOHANDAS GANDHI IS TO SAUL OF TARSUS WHAT MUHAMMAD ALI JINNAH IS TO SAINT JOHN.

MOHANDAS GANDHI IS TO TIM BERNERS LEE WHAT MUHAMMAD ALI JINNAH IS TO TED NELSON.

MOHANDAS GANDHI IS TO NAZISM/NEONAZISM WHAT MUHAMMAD ALI JINNAH IS TO NATIONAL SOCIALISM.

MOHANDAS GANDHI IS TO WHITE RICE WHAT MUHAMMAD ALI JINNAH IS TO BROWN RICE.

>>1100654

Perfidious Denamrk isn't allowed

File: britishpepe.jpg (69KB, 736x708px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 736x708px

>>1100654
England reporting in.

File: 0d9.jpg (88KB, 960x702px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 960x702px

Best country wasn't in existence yet.

Posting here to say that I don't acknowledge your interdiction against posting here if your country didn't fight against the HRE.

>>1100519
Yes, 1683 was a huge mistake for Poland.

Not only they got betrayed by their fellow catholic brothers, but also partitioned by the ones they saved.

>inb4 TWASN'T JUST POLAND xdXDDD
German troops died like flies, Sobieski took charge quiete literally and commanded to victory.
German troops stopped fighting to just see the Polish charge on Ottomans.

File: 1453922762189.png (638KB, 687x1043px) Image search: [Google]

638KB, 687x1043px

>>1100519
>Before Vienna: Poland at the zenith of it's power
Also to add more, not really.

1683 was after Swedish Deluge and Cossack uprisings, so it was pretty crashed at this moment. Charge in Vienna was the last show of power by Polish state.

Also, there will be shitton of Prussiapros, germanboos in this thread any second.

The French would not help the Austrians. Actually, they helped the Turks by moving their troops to the frontier, forcing the Austrians to divide their forces and to not have the help of some western members of the Empire that had to be guard against the French.

The French would not have defeated the Turks, if the Turks managed to conquer Vienna.

File: 1461763363373.jpg (2MB, 2800x2067px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2800x2067px

Because there was no reliable census, there can be no reliable consensus.

Even back in the 50s my grandfather was able to lie his age to get the Korean war. Bureaucracy and people charged with counting big numbers sucked donkey dick until very recently in history.

Even today we have trouble knowing precisely how much traffic there is on the road, even with cameras everywhere. Why would someone in 1514 be able to look at a maelstrom of murder and know how many bodies there were?

Pic related. How many people live on this street?

>>1100511
I like the idea of one or both sides employing people to go around and count how many dead bodies or lost equipment there was after a battle. That seems pretty comical to me. It's like they sent in the army, so now it's time to send in the bureaucrats.

File: img.png (39KB, 299x626px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 299x626px

Turkish sources would be the best one.

>>1100281
1. Why would someone not belonging to a certain religion be swayed by the concept of afterlife of that certain religion to which he doesn't belong?

2. Any religion that relies on fear, obedience, and tradition-based customs, is not spiritual, and therefore it has no relation to God.

>>1100295
Apologies, I should have been clearer in that I was referring to atheists and agnostics, and not practitioners of other religions

>>1100297
The same still applies, idiot.

He meant this isn't history
>>>/pol/

File: 1441878766523.jpg (97KB, 696x462px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 696x462px

>>1100198
>writings from 1925
>not history

But man has always been of mixed race. The strong have always been mixing with the strong and the degenerates are left to breed with degenerates. This is how all lifeforms breed and evolve. Just like we see today with shitty people living in shitty areas of the world, being shitty and poor, simultaneously the great people live in the great areas of the world and are rich and prosperous. This is how it's always been and how it always will be. We are all "mixed" race and have always been, it's just that people tend to mix with people who are of a similar disposition. A succesful man will take a succesful wife and have succesful children, a poor fucking gypsy will take a gypsy wife and spawn gypsy children.

Experiencing states of mind similar to those described in religious texts, while not believing in the supernatural.

if you hear that then you're talking to a white person

I'm too cool for established religions.