Archived threads in /his/ - History & Humanities - 3630. page

I don't know

I dunno faggot, is it?

>>1115462
I'd say both, because while lack of ignorance will make man less happy, he is still going to grow as a person, purely because of the virtue.

>>1115171
who cares. it's not like you'll ever get a date anyway you fucking neckbeard loser

>>1115171
how can a belief be immoral?

>>1115184
how is morality anything but a belief?

depends on what that life would contain

but that doesn't mean this is a reasonable question.

>>1115083
being stuck in a vegetative state

sure being locked up in some dungeon getting tortered to death

Which of Rawls' arguments are you talking about? He makes many arguments in his book of that title, the main one being in favor of the difference principle. Is that the one you mean?

Money determines way of life though sex is not materialistic

File: MolyFootShoot-figurative.jpg (64KB, 425x282px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 425x282px

>>1114675

Ask your dad if you can convert his tool shed to a cuck shed you can live in

Stop using technology

Go beg for for food

>>1114619
>begging

That shit is immoral son

>>1114624
Diogenes was a begger

>>1114590
United states law is a clusterfuck, why d you think the US is screwed up so bad?
Not even highly educated people understand laws and how taxes work in the US. Around only 12% of the population can even do their taxes by themselves without a computer program

the common law system dates back to the 1100's and is built on the idea of precedent, so rulings and laws that were made almost 1000 years ago still have legal relevance today

honestly it's a miracle it works as well as it does at this point

>>1114605

Do you have to do your taxes yourself in the US? Here in Sweden if you're an employee you just get a letter home with how much you'll be getting.

>>1114555
And I'm not talking about the history of navigation, I'm asking more in the sense of recognising the fact that some things (the Sun coming out on one side and setting on the other, or cold winds blowing opposite from the direction of warm winds) needed to be defined and recognised

>>1114568
this is not a meme get out

>>1115051
What? I really want to know. Isnt this /his/?

>>1114452
It started as a mediterranean tradition. Arguably from the Phoenicians dedicating their boats to their gods and calling it by the name of their gods. Romans, Greeks took it up, and then Medieval Europe/Islam took it up as well. Outside the Med, I think only vikings did name their ships.

File: Chinese Naval ship.jpg (730KB, 1174x1300px) Image search: [Google]

730KB, 1174x1300px

>>1114459
Contd.

In E. Asia - based on the Chinese example- they definitely did not have names. If anything, a ship's name is the name of the commander in charge of the vessel. Traditionally the only East Asian ship with a name is the unusually large Japanese Atakebune warship "Nihonmaru." But even this isn't a name: it just means "Ship of the State." (i.e. Flagship).

However, Asians do have traditions and supersitions on their ships. Nips tie votive Shinto amulets to the god, Susanoo on the prow. Chinks carve faces on the prows of their ships so that the spirits guiding the ship could see, often fierce faces to scare bad luck. Flags depicting bats were put on the masts as bats were considered good luck among Chinese sailors.

>>1114459
This kind of surprises me. I always thought that people have a natural tendency to give important objects names.

>>1114414
Here's how this thread is gonna go:

>Who?
>Fag who talks shit about the religion of peace
>Fag who sends that fag straight back to the politics board
>Shitflinging contest until the thread 404s

History

Who?

>>1114682
Based Muslim leader that fought off the Crusaders. He was known for his honour. Truly a religion of peace.

>>1114296
History isn't profitable because the average goyi--... Joe doesn't give a fuck.

Need more viewers so it expanded to cater to a larger audience

>>1114296
history

>>1114225
soon, hopefully

>P L E B S

>>1114225
Alright then
You first :^)

>>1114209
Khalid

Inb4
>Muh exhausted empires

Because Allah was on their side! !!Allah Akbar! !!Allah Akbar! !!Allah Akbar! !!Allah Akbar! !!Allah Akbar! !!Allah Akbar! !!
But seriously. Superior tactics and weak enemy.

>>1114209
Because well organized army against exhausted adversaries.

File: image.jpg (124KB, 468x589px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 468x589px

>>1114031
No, this isn't it...

File: image.jpg (722KB, 1200x1571px) Image search: [Google]

722KB, 1200x1571px

>>1114031
Still looking
1937 02 14

File: American Muhammed.jpg (106KB, 612x612px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 612x612px

>>1114031
>>1114058
>>1114072


Found it myself on the net.
Thanks for the other attempts though!

There has been some changes in cart technology though.

>>1114056
Yeah, but that didn't make anything go faster. The top speed over land was always the top speed of a horse.

That's why we had boats

>>1113961
Did Napoleon win after Capturing Moscow?

>>1113961
>>1114272
That time the situation was different. Look and transport map of Russia. Moscow is a transport hub, the biggest one, many railroads end there, wermacht would paralize every transport connectiin between different armies/regions etc.

Germany didn't come within a prayer of taking Moscow so this question is pointless. Would taking the US have allowed Germany to win WW2? Probably. What is the point of such stupid questions, though?