Is there any criticism of Marx that doesn't amount to hysterical slander and outrage by right-wing ideologues no less ideological than Marx himself?
Any and all attacks I've ever read border on nonsense by make statements far too bold (I.E. I believe Marx is wrong about one detail, ergo EVERYTHING HE DID WAS FALSE), or are so utterly ignorant of his stances that they don't even bear consideration.
Is there any systematic, coherent and calm criticism of Marx by people without an ideological slant?
>>1118072
>without
>an
>ideological
>slant
Good joke, OP.
First rate comedy.
aren't you tired of making the same threads every day?
>>1118088
Are you implying that's impossible?
why the fuck are people obsessed over what his genitals looked like?
Why the fuck are you so butthurt?
because he was just insecure like all white racists
>>1117792
I don't think OP can handle being told his Führer has small and deformed genitalia
Why so popular, /his/? How do so many people not realize the value of a moderately powerful state to regulate private economic interests?
Mental retardation.
>>1117765
There are no private economic interests that aren't fulfilled by the free market.
>>1117765
>as anarchists we oppose coercive hierarchy
>but as capitalists we want our economic system to be a coercive hierarchy
It's an ideology for wealthy people who like weed and are ok with homosexuality
Tell me about the 2nd Mexican Empire.
>>1117745
>Second
>Mexican
>Empire
>>1118134
lmao I swear I didn't have to open up the thread to know what the first reply was going to be
>>1117745
Benito Juarez was an asshole! A native mexican full of hatred and resentment towards white people.
Nowadays everyone gives him hero status but he was just a very angry little man.
The Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution. 50 years ago the Chinese youth went absolutely insane. But what was it all about, in the end?
Was it just a way for Mao to purge his political enemies inside the Communist Party. Was it actually a popular movement that got out of control.
How does the people of China see the whole thing? I'd guess that, no matter how much the government condemns it, most people probably miss their days of carefree roaming around the countryside doing revolution, subjecting teachers and other figures of authority to "struggle sessions", joining Red Guard groups with your friends.
It seemed to be a great time to be alive. It's basically what everyone in the whole countercultural movement across the Western world wanted during the 1960s, but only the Chinese got it.
>>1117617
Why would the Chinese willingly kill their own culture?
>>1117651
because it was a shit culture
>>1117653
Bullshit, the culture was fine. The fact that they willingly killed it is disgraceful. At least the women are cute, most of the time, on the occasion.
>yfw the powerful Roman Republic came into being because the kangs son muhdikked a noblewoman which created a chimpout that led to the overthrow of the kang himself
Daily reminder that the Tarquins did nothing wrong.
>>1117151
One thing is the reason, another the pretext. The Roman Republic, and every Republic, is the rule of the oligarchy.
You forgot to say "cuck".
i'm starting university in september and i don't want to go in unprepared. i have read quite a lot of philosophy but outside of that i have almost no familiarity with the humanities.
feel free to link me to a top 100 list or just your top 10 or whatever
Faust by Goethe
Meditations by Emperor Marcus Aurelius
Sex and Character by Otto Weininger
The Iliad and The Odyssey by Homer
The World as Will and Representation by Arthur Schopenhauer
The Divine Comedy by Dante
The only book you need.
>>1117110
Marx
Freud
Foucault
Whig Interpretation of History
What is History
Making of the English Working Class
Orientalism
Can /his/ give some more examples of broad historical geopolitical goals for individual nations?
For example:
>Britain
Preventing any single power from dominating the European continent, keeping the seas open for trade and commerce, and controlling key naval chokepoints (Gibraltar, Singapore, Suez, etc)
>Russia
Establishing buffer client states or directly ruled border provinces that protect Russia from land invasion, securing a warm water port, and dominating Central Asia
>Germans
Roping together the various central European states under a single leader/flag
>United States
Pushing out European colonial governments in the Americas and replacing hem with compliant puppet states, realising Manifest Destiny
Any major ones I'm missing or ones I've got wrong?
>Aztec Empire
Allowing enemy states to live and trade, but under the condition of having constant ceremonial wars were the Aztec as always the winner, in order to keep its "trade partners" always weak in military numbers without having to actually invade or waste more resources than needed, and sacrificing countless numbers of war prisoners passing it as a religious affair, but in reality being a way of showing off its power to the neighborhood
>Russia only invaded / occupied other countries because they wanted to protect themselves
Back to 2ch vatnik scum
>France
Get baguette
What if there was united, capitalist Korea from 1945?
Gee, I dunno.
It would probably be unified and capitalist
>>1117029
This gives a rough idea
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-korea-north-united-idUSTRE58K0OA20090921
Has there ever been a Christian secret (or discrete) society dedicated to fight the many revolutionary movements and ideologies that have sprung up since the French Revolution in the East or West?
It seems like every Christian religious society is dedicated to entryism of Judeo-Masonic, Marxist, homosexual etc. elements INTO the Church as opposed to the Church trying to influence society...
>>1116961
>Has there ever been a Christian secret (or discrete) society dedicated to fight the many revolutionary movements and ideologies that have sprung up since the French Revolution in the East or West?
There was the occasional political party in places like Germany and Italy however for the most part it has been unnecessary as for the past 1600 years they have been the establishment and hence not forced into secrecy.
In modern times though there has be a decently successful push by evangelicals to gain control of the lower tiers of the Republican party but thats about it.
>It seems like every Christian religious society is dedicated to entryism of Judeo-Masonic, Marxist, homosexual etc. elements INTO the Church.
Im guessing you are a Catholic here so in general its not entryism at all but creating bodies controlled by the church to contain those people who might be lured by other groups.
>Church trying to influence society...
They have gotten so addicted to Cesare doing the dirty work that they have lost the ability and will to do this and now that the State is no longer willing to play ball they are in a rough position.
>>1116981
>They have gotten so addicted to Cesare doing the dirty work that they have lost the ability and will to do this and now that the State is no longer willing to play ball they are in a rough position.
So true.
>>1116961
There's been plenty of Christian societies trying to make global changes. The Catholic church has had a ton of different bodies, and it itself was a society.
The fact is you don't need to make your society secret if you are on the defense. If you wanted to defend what people perceive as normal why would you go out of your way to make your society harder to find? You'd just lose power that way.
A society only needs to be secret if it is doing something the ruling powers would not approve of. The point of the secret is that they can't stop you if they can't find you or figure out what you are doing.
>Judeo-Masonic, Marxist, homosexua
You mean like what the Catholic has become LOL
Are historians and political scientists just stamp collecting establishment PR men? I get the impression that they are.
>>1116855
No.
>>1116855
Yes.
>>1116855
Maybe.
ITT: We post and discuss only god tier /his/tory books.
>pic related
inb4 Jared Diamond
Best book I've read on the causes of WWI and resulting the foundational shift from monarchy to Democracy/Communism/Fascism in Europe
>>1116635
is this a good book or not?
>>1117017
Apparently it is god tier
>To the strongest!
What did he mean by this?
>>1116515
please fight for centuries because im stupid
>>1116515
>Just fuck my empire up, famalan
He was pissed he wouldn't be around to rule the empire he created, so he sowed the seeds of civil war to ensure no one could.
Did Canada do anything interesting throughought history besides burning the White House?
>>1116441
Die In WWI and WWII for bongs
Terrorist québécois insurgency
Mini-USA rebellion that the USA actually helped suppress
And loose a tiny bit of land in BC
Other than that nothing much.
Can't recall learning anything about CAN in school. Don't recall them mention the burning thing. And even the capitol I was told not from a history book but from a friend.
yeah if someone could answer OP question Im also interested
fight against natives for centuries. read up on Riel and the Riel rebellion.
Hey /his/
I was wondering if there is any stories surrounding famous bodyguards of royalty in medieval europe? Ive always been interested in people who protect royalty rather than royalty themselves.
Id appreciate any info you can give, thanks in advance.
>>1116433
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dafydd_Gam
He protected Henry so does that make him a bodyguard?
>>1116473
ah yeah man thanks, sorry i should have made it clearer, basically im looking for people who protect royalty, so people who saved their lives or people who stood out
>>1116433
>be bodyguard of Phillip II of Macedon
>get assraped by Macedonian men
>ask Phillip for justice
>phillip denies me justice because my rapists are influential men
>kill phillip out of spite
and because of this phillip is never called the great while his son gets all the credit for the macedonian empire.