Muslims of /his/. Was Muhammad Ali a Kuffar and is he going to heaven or hell?
54 Posts / 9 Images
View this topic
>>
>is he going to heaven or hell
no
>>
>>1238443
Kuffar = plural form
kaafir = singular
why would he be a kafir? Never heard that he was anything other than an orthodox muslim
>>
>>1238443
There is no "muslim heaven".
>Jesus said to him, "I am the Way, and the Truth, and the Life. No one comes to the Father except through me."
John 14:6
What could Britain have done in the past to ensure it's survival? What were some of its bigger mistakes or blunders?
55 Posts / 6 Images
View this topic
>>
>>1237852
joining ww1
>>
>>1237852
It's biggest mistake was not just making peace with the Nazis in 1940 and retaining their empire. The U.S forcing them to dismantle it was always one of the greatest and ironic injustices of the 20th century considering their own imperialist tendencies.
>>
But they did survive.
Their country makes a shitload of money, and it's secure from conquest.
That's all the colonies were intended to do.
File: IordanusBrunusNolanus.png (207KB, 1014x315px) Image search:
[Google]
207KB, 1014x315px
I don't have faith in God, but I have faith that, if there is a God, he wouldn't get mad at me over something as petty as belief.
Is this a form of valid faith?
153 Posts / 23 Images
View this topic
>>
>>1231777
No.
sage, report, hidden
>>
>>1231777
I think you already know all the answers you're going to get from the boards theists.
>>
>>1231777
You expect god not to be mad at you for not believing you exist? You're either retarded or an asshole. If the Christian God exists, then this entity is a person, it is a jealous person who has given everything good in your life as well as creating an environment for everything bad in your life. In short, it the Christian god exists, he has had the most impact on your life, more than anyone else you've ever known.
How many of your friends and family would tolerate you thinking that they didn't exist? I'll bet none.
Why do you expect that this jealous god would tolerate such behavior forever?
Who is the worst American President of all time, and why is it pic related?
55 Posts / 9 Images
View this topic
>>
>>1238638
That's not James Buchannan.
>>
>>1238641
This
File: 232040440_4_english-civil-war-roundhead.jpg (52KB, 280x420px) Image search:
[Google]
52KB, 280x420px
>treasonous goblins demanding enclosure
>the murder of Strafford
>closing theatres because Shakespeare is naughty
Roundheads are the worst
182 Posts / 14 Images
View this topic
>>
Remember, Oliver Cromwell did nothing wrong :^)
>>
>>1236062
If you're a moral nihilist, maybe
>>
File: levellers.jpg (571KB, 1833x2953px) Image search:
[Google]
571KB, 1833x2953px
>>1236052
>tfw the only good side didn't win
File: platonic nu-male.jpg (33KB, 320x321px) Image search:
[Google]
33KB, 320x321px
>Alexander
>Great
143 Posts / 21 Images
View this topic
>>
>>1234081
No, I'm sorry, the correct response was "Alexander THE Great". So close. Well, that will do it for today's show. Tune in tomorrow to see another neckbeard make a fool out of himself.
>>
>>1234081
Alexander was only "great" because other famous members of the patriarchy believed he was. Real great women of the ancient era like Cleopatra don't get enough recognition.
>>
File: MacedonEmpire.jpg (2MB, 2000x961px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 2000x961px
>>1234081
quite Great
not bad for a gay dude
File: barbary-slave-trade.jpg (40KB, 554x375px) Image search:
[Google]
40KB, 554x375px
White Slavery
I would like to talk about white slavery and find out what is just a /pol/ meme, what is reality.
With white slavery I mean:
"White slavery, white slave trade, white Slave Traffic and white slave historically refer to the enslavement of Europeans by non-Europeans, as part of the Arab, Barbary and Ottoman slave trade."
Does anyone know good sources about it that shed some light on it? If you google, you find a lot of dubious stuff and even things that seem to be influenced by (sexual/fetishistical) orientalism.
231 Posts / 39 Images
View this topic
>>
There was no "white slave trade"
There was an "infidel slave trade"
White people happened to be infidels
So were subsaharan Africans, southeast Asians
>>
>>1232169
I am currently the slave of my wife's boyfriend, ask me anything
>>
>>1232169
Read up on the Barbary corsairs
File: ostrogoths.gif (53KB, 803x534px) Image search:
[Google]
53KB, 803x534px
Are there any groups of people or nations /his/ wishes would've survived?
Personally, I think it'd be hella neat if the Goths had managed to exist as an entity in the western Balkans or something. that'd be pretty neat for sure.
72 Posts / 9 Images
View this topic
>>
C'mon OP why would you want some Germanics from the Baltic to have survived when their material culture isn't even remarkable.
The obvious answer....
God damnit Varus where are my legions?! Had Teutoburg Forest not happened and the Germania canpaigns been successful Rome would have had an Elbe-Danube Border Frontier.
Much more easily defendable and supply lines would've been river-bound rather than cut off by the Alps...
Not even a Romaboo, I just wish the Empire didn't get royally fucked over in its infancy. Germanicus and Varrus living would've changed things dramatically =^{(
>>
>>>>1235680
>infancy
por que amigo?
>>
>>1235689
Infancy referring to the Roman Empire not the Roman empire. Big E meaning the principate. The centralized govt without the prospect of Charismatic warlords potentially destroying it all the times definitely meant it was a new state.
Key words: all the time.
Figures like Septimius Severus would be capable of seizing power the way they did because of the immediate treachery that allowed the succession of Tiberius
File: 1441665955196.jpg (85KB, 1279x720px) Image search:
[Google]
85KB, 1279x720px
Misotheists, how are you going to defeat God? He's practically invincible.
Are you implying that an omnipotent being can have a weakness?
>inb4 iron chariots
110 Posts / 15 Images
View this topic
>>
>>1231629
Look at how sad the middle one looks
Also there was a thread on /r/atheism that was pretty cringey where people talked about how they'd kill God if Christianity turned out to be true
>>
>>1231636
>killing god
As an atheist, even I know that's retarded.
>>
>>1231646
Assuming that the Abrahamic God does exist, would it be better to submit to him? He is after all, objectively right.
File: DSCI0569.jpg (3MB, 3264x2448px) Image search:
[Google]
3MB, 3264x2448px
Found these while cleaning the attic of my childhood home.
Can anyone identify them? i.e. are they real and if so what do they stand for? What do they say?
More pictures incoming
11 Posts / 7 Images
View this topic
>>
File: DSCI0570.jpg (3MB, 3264x2448px) Image search:
[Google]
3MB, 3264x2448px
>>1243305
>>
File: DSCI0571.jpg (3MB, 3264x2448px) Image search:
[Google]
3MB, 3264x2448px
>>1243306
>>
File: DSCI0572.jpg (3MB, 3264x2448px) Image search:
[Google]
3MB, 3264x2448px
>>1243310
File: frankening.jpg (132KB, 917x960px) Image search:
[Google]
132KB, 917x960px
So, tell me. Was he french or german. Was he right or wrong. Was he the true emperor of the western empire or a fake > > >
15 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
>>1242633
Neither, he was nordid
>>
>>1242633
He was frankish. Back then french or german identities were meaningless. His legacy, however, is more french than german ; Germans were mostly saxons and the new crowned "Holy" "Roman" "Empire" claimed to come from Widukind, whereas the french Kings always claimed to be tied to Charlemagne (For exemple, they carry his sword, Joyeuse).
Charlemagne was a violent religious zealot, who campaigned countlessly and killed his nephews, so he was a monster. But still. He brought back a lot of stability, gave power to the church and provoked the Carolingian Renaissance, so even for all his wrong-doing Europe should be grateful that he was there to do the things he did.
He wasn't a Roman Empire. Whatever. Who cares ? No one is going to miss the Roman Empire. What matters is that he forged modern Western Europe.
>>
HE SHED THE BLOOD OF SAXON MEN
File: kistock9.jpg (173KB, 1036x1500px) Image search:
[Google]
173KB, 1036x1500px
Why are some children cruel to animals?
18 Posts / 4 Images
View this topic
>>
Because kids are dumb as fuck
>>
Because children are assholes in general.
>>
>>1242581
>Not aware of social taboos
>No impulse control
Kids are sociopaths
Anonymous
Meta discussion, mods please read 2016-06-05 08:41:34 Post No.1242122
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Meta discussion, mods please read 2016-06-05 08:41:34 Post No.1242122
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: download.png (497KB, 434x554px) Image search:
[Google]
497KB, 434x554px
Meta discussion, mods please read
Anonymous
2016-06-05 08:41:34
Post No. 1242122
[Report]
[View this topic]
Can we get rid of religious shitposting? Is there any way to reduce the amount of "DAE le Christianity?" shit being posted constantly? I know it's abolished because they're unflappable and respond to serious questions with "no because Christ is Lord" and make their own threads about religion but never respond when people don't take the bait.
It's ruining this board and it makes it all the more obvious this board is where /pol/ comes to troll. Pic related its my utter disgust at you fucking plebs shilling your prophets constantly with no regard to historiography.
8 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
File: 1461266909305.jpg (1MB, 3508x2480px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 3508x2480px
>>1242122
>with no regard to historiography
Reminder that the Gospels were written before AD 70.
>>
>>1242151
They have a goal other than to record history, therefore completely unreliable. Useful for seeing what Christians believed/how they changed Judaism to appeal to Greeks more.
>>
>>1242170
>They have a goal other than to record history, therefore completely unreliable.
That's not how it works.
File: 4476838526_8441206719_b.jpg (551KB, 1024x797px) Image search:
[Google]
551KB, 1024x797px
>Are our opponents going to reply that the Roman Empire could not have been increased so far and wide, and Roman glory could not have spread, except by continual wars, following one upon another? What a satisfying explanation! Why must an empire be deprived of peace, in order that it may be great? In regard to men’s bodies it is surely better to be of moderate size, and to be healthy, than to reach the immense stature of a giant at the cost of unending disorders - not to rest when that stature is reached, but to be troubled with greater disorders with the increasing size of the limbs. Would any evil have resulted, would not, in fact, the result have been wholly good, if that first era had persisted? Here is Sallust’s brief description of those times:
>‘At the beginning of history the name of kings was given to the first wielders of power. Those kings differed in their inclinations: some exercised their mental powers, others their physical abilities. At that time men’s life was lived without greed, and each man was content with what he had.’
Well, /his/? Can an empire be great and peaceful at the same time?
8 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
This question is really good.
>>
>>1242250
And it will get no reply's unless someone brings up niggers, Christianity or Hitler
>>
>>1242268
It's horrifying...
File: 1445591405125.jpg (50KB, 490x357px) Image search:
[Google]
50KB, 490x357px
http://www.strawpoll.me/10402023
do it for research on the board /his/. Curious to find out.
Also, I know what these terms mean today, but what are their origins?
13 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
>I know what these terms mean today
If you really did, you wouldn't be polling us.
>what are their origins?
>French Revolution of 1789 when members of the National Assembly divided into supporters of the king to the president's right and supporters of the revolution to his left
>>
>>1241890
hey anon, anon might say something, but he may really believe something else
>>
File: ru}nbp14.gif (4KB, 360x216px) Image search:
[Google]
4KB, 360x216px
>>1241878
Querfront.
>Sparta-Potsdam-Moscow!