Could Diogenes have found an honest man if he had access to modern technology?
>>1244945
what, like a flashlight?
>>1244957
Good job, OP. This was funny.
>>1244957
Yes, how many lumen are necessary to spot one?
So what exactly is wrong with this book?
>>1244447
Stated reason: oversells geographical determinism.
Real reason: hurts the self-important fee-fees of poltards.
>taking geographic determinism seriously
>So what exactly is wrong with this book?
the author is jewish
Are you proud of your country's history?
>>1244066
Fuck yeah bud.
Is Jesus on the cross the true symbol of Christianity? It seems like it was created by Jews to remind Christians that they put their Messiah on the cross and to piss off Muslims because they don't believe that Christ was crucified.
>>1243847
>Is Jesus on the cross the true symbol of Christianity?
Yes.
>But we preach Christ crucified, unto the Jews a stumblingblock, and unto the Greeks foolishness; But unto them which are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God, and the wisdom of God.
>>1243847
>The message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God.
1 Corinthians 1:18
>>1244640
who is the quote in the image from?
So while sitting in the backyard today I got pic related (not me though).
It made me wonder, how did ancient europeans handle sunburn? If they would be made up of sun-sensitive individuals they would surely feel the negative impact of being outside all day, unprotected.
So how did the fuckers do it? How were they special?
Did they just wear clothes? Were they genetically different from current white europeans in a way that mad them more resistant to sunburn? Did they use herbs/natural remedies?
All the way from pre-historic europeans all the way until the invention of sunblock.
Tell me /his/, TELL ME
>>1243304
the seasons give a natural base for a tan, the problem is that we spend the majority of our time inside then SUDDENLY spend all day outside in summer.
And there are several folk remedies for this kind of thing, honey, yoghurt, oat paste, bee wax etc.
>>1243348
/thread
>>1243304
people that got in the sun never needed sunblock, they just worked in the sun and got gradualy tanned, or burned, same as they got calouses on their hands and feet or say, frostbite in winter
look at older peoples skin if you go trough a rural or seaside area
on the other hand smooth white skin was a sign of distinction, a sign you dont have to actualy work outside, upper class women acted like direct sunlight is toxic
How was North Africa like before Arab conquest?
>>1243177
Why is there a statue of Zeus and a Parthenon in this picture of Carthage?
>>1243182
Cultural enrichment.
>>1243177
Lots of Christians and people still spoke Latin.
Heinrich Himmler, influenced by the "Neu-Volkisch" movement of post-WW1 Germany, saw Charles as "the Slayer of Saxons" and idolized the Saxons who fought against him and who tried to save their race and their religion against Judaism/Christianity.
Hitler on the other hand was opposed to that demonization and said that Charles was on the Greatest humans ever beacuse he managed to unite the Germans; and he mentioned to Alfred Rosenberg that it wouldn't be wise to let people demonize him by calling him the "Slayer of Saxons?"
Who was right?
Was he evil for murdering so many Saxons in the name of Judaism/Christianity and to enforce an alien religion upon the white man?
Or was he a great man by doing a step to unite the Germanic people?
>Was he evil for murdering so many Saxons in the name of Judaism/Christianity and to enforce an alien religion upon the white man? Or was he a great man by doing a step to unite the Germanic people?
Rather simple, really. I'd say both. And it's not white, it's Aryan. Whiteness is irrelevant.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=cvKRbi2ovDY
>>1241224
Saxons are not even human, so it's not evil, but true justice to destroy them.
What was the best time and place to be alive? Is the current year always preferable to the last year?
>>1241210
The best time and place to be alive is the time you're living in right now.
You just have to get off your ass.
Late 19th and early 20th century avant-garde syndicalist circles in Europe.
I like the internet and cellphones too much to ever go back.
People take digital technology for granted too much. It's seriously fucking revolutionary. It's easily the greatest advance since the printing press as far as the spread of knowledge goes.
Was it too much?
>>1239666
No. The mistake was not doing the same with Germany.
>>1239681
yeah Germany didn't lose any territory at all after WWI
Are you implying any of those released territories were Hungarian?
Was 1066 the worst year in English history?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Fulford
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Stamford_Bridge
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Hastings
Also has anyone seen this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PnC6l6_TaMA
No it was the best.
normans>saxoniggers
Post World War 1 memorials from your country.
oh fuck, wrong board. Never mind.
I don't know how this is a wrong board topic but here's the big horse dick in my town, I can see it from my window.
Serfdom had been gradually dying long before, but Queen Elizabeth abolished it completely. But years later, when King Charles lost the Civil War, the movement against enclosure died with him, and as a consequence the freed agrarian workers were deprived of land to work on, and had to clock to industrial work, which lead to a massive decline in the quality of life. If King Charles had won, it could have lead to the rise of agrarian guilds.
Communists often say this was something required, because though enclosure trampled upon the working class, they say it was necessary for capitalism and economic development. However, I think we have to question as to whether enclosure was necessary for economic development. It lead to an export based economy of things like beef and pork, but it also lead to a tremendous rise of domestic hunger and malnurshiment and people dying at a younger age, which really detracts from labor capacity. It is true that without enclosure, there would not have been as large of a rush toward urban employment, but this could have been remedied by higher compensation to bring workers; certainly employers through the period of urbanization, up to the industrial revolution, could have afforded drastically better standards of living for their employees. What is more, if King Charles had won, it would have caused a centralization of power back in the nobility away from the bourgeoisie, and that would mean some nobles would continue to hold urban environments as their livelihood. For the nobles who did, and gained from it, they surely would have invested in urban development and industrialization as much as the bourgeoisie, but the workers here would have had better lifestyles, and technology would not be oriented as much toward populism, but toward improving the quality of society.
It is true that monarchism is merely argument from authority applied to politics, but isn't that preferable to argumentum ad populum applied to politics? I do not mean to sound like a snob, but popular opinion is terrible when it comes to art and science and theology and, well, pretty much everything, and the idea that popular opinion in politics is optimal, strikes me as counter intuitive.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aJSwfrmponQ
im waiting for the part where this becomes a thread about Orthodoxy
>>1251399
England isn't Orthodox
>Called neighbors or non-chinese "filthy barbarians"
>muh country in the middle
>Gets rekt everytime by those filthy barbarians
Explain this.
when will they learn ?
>>1246661
>Outnumbered your enemy
>Still get your ass kicked
Typical chink battle
Those goddamn human wave chinks, when will they ever learn.
>You're a German soldier, looking out at the grey seas and skies of the English Channel one morning, when suddenly a few ships pop into view.
>Then more ships. And planes. And landing craft. And thousands of men heading for your beach.
>You thought you'd got off easily being posted in France. Hundreds of thousands of your fellow Germans were entrapped in Stalingrad a couple of years ago. Thousands more are being torn apart as the Red Army and their tanks surge through The Eastern Front.
>Until now. The wealthiest and most vastly resourced nation in human history, capable of production on a level unparalleled by any other state in the war, is rocking up on your beach.
>With them are British forces, aided by Commonwealth nations, along with allies from Poland and exiled French forces.
>Scheisse.
What do?
Would you run?
Well, I'm already losing the war since 1942, so what's the big deal?
>>1244749
>le hindsight man
People living through events don't have the benefit of knowing how things end up.
Many Germans may still have believed they could turn the tide of the Russian advance in the East, and stall/prevent any Western front being opened by the Allies. Possibly sue for a truce that would keep their nation relatively intact.
The Nazi state didn't properly start falling apart until '45 IMO.
>>1244731
>Would you run?
What kind of stupid question is that?
If original indoeuropeans were tan black eyed semitic looking, and blue eyes developed from nonPIE population, Then why are there light eyed people in the indian, iberian, iranian and afghan populations where the native population was also dark?
>>1244201
>If original indoeuropeans were tan black eyed semitic looking
Nobody believes that. Die in a fire.
occasional mutations and albinism?
>>1244220
Indians and western SJW college professors believe that.