Archived threads in /his/ - History & Humanities - 3416. page

Go back to /pol/ you low test skinny fat manlet faggot.

>>1294678
>Philistine literally means "invader"

Lmao @ ur life OP

>>1294682
Butthurt Zionist revisionist detected

>>1294683

Another one detected.

Yeah lap dances for $30 at Parkway Tropics

>Manifest destiny
>believed it was out destiny to travel west to the other sea
>ends when we actually traveled to the west to the other sea

Indian status: TOLD

>>1294281
Is that Haiti/Dominican?

>>1294268
>.buttblasted mountain monkey

Takeda still mad as hell

>samurai
>swords

>Uesagi Kenshin goes into the fray
>character known as unstoppable and the reincarnation of a fucking heavenly king
>vs the demon lord a battle of good and evil
>dies before the battle begin

fucking plot armor

File: Вечная_Россия.jpg (547KB, 2000x1026px) Image search: [Google]

547KB, 2000x1026px

I like the one with everyone in here.

File: famous-faces-big_1367237a.jpg (658KB, 2600x1127px) Image search: [Google]

658KB, 2600x1127px

>>1294109
Another one that I remember well.

I was recently in Vienna, and was surprised to see that painting there.
I assumed it was in France.

There's always an heir

>>1293977
>Bruce Willis dies
>No hair

>Bugs Bunny dies
>No hare

Africas horn had a Christian presence long before Europeans got there if that's what you are referring to

>Implying Jesus wasn't black

>>1294101
He wasn't black, he was brown at most. Look at native semetic Muslims in Palestine today if you want an accurate representation of what Jesus probably looked like. Not a faggoty white blue eyed bitch.

>>1293792
>Did they really want to invade America?
They didn't
>What was the Japan's war plan?
They hoped that the war won't escalate and that they will defeat the US quickly in few major sea battles which will bring Americans to peace table as Japanese hoped that public opinion in the US won't support the war for few islands on the Pacific they don't care about. The peace terms were very simple as well - few islands on Pacific Ocean and lifting embargoes, nothing exorbitant or unacceptable.

The Pacific bases here would be just for the negotiation purposes as well - you always want to get more than somebody else can offer, the main point of Japanese attack was to lift the embargoes and allow them to expand freely in Southeast Asia and China.

>>1293812
>you always want to get more than somebody else can offer
I'll rephrase it - you always ask for more than you need

>>1293812
>The peace terms were very simple as well - few islands on Pacific Ocean and lifting embargoes, nothing exorbitant or unacceptable.
Thank God for someone saying this. Why must people always imagine for themselves that Japan and Germany would've invaded America.

Both would have simply requested neutrality from the US. I can't even imagine why people would think that the Axis powers would put themselves through the hassle of invading the US. That seems so impractical.

ye olde meme

I wonder what kind of shitposting each ancient culture had.

>>1293717
The once and future meme.

>>1293664
Had the british not retreated cowardly at Dunkirk and the morale for undertating the Saar offensive not been depleted you mean?

I really couldn't say. There'd have been a far higher likelihood of a stalemate though, with french troops looming dangerously on Germany's entire industrial region in the West, and german troops lingering just as dangerously some kilometers from Paris.

It'd have been have a "he has my balls in his hands, but I have his in my hands, so everything will be fine so long as none of us make a move" narrative really.

If the French had done things right they might have won.
But they only made mistakes.

None, the French were still stuck in WW1 and it took them ages to advance their army.

>>1293715
Saar """"offensive""" happened before Dunkirk retard

Don't you think it's pretty silly to imply that every culture must go through the same steps in the same order? Culture doesn't really work like that. Also why would slavery put on hold cultural developments? Slaves still had a culture particular to themselves even while slaves. Not to mention not all blacks were slaves.

>>1293655
Then i guess the first taste of freedom and liberty is a path that branchs out limitlessly. Like if two isolated societies were given weapons, they would be violent. But black people weren't given the same obstacles throughout their use of freedom. So yeah, I definitely agree. I was seeing if there was ant sense in my little connections

>>1293663
Are you autistic? You realize that African American's in the south have the exact same culture as other southerners right?

>>1293578
yes humans are animals, and we are just as if not more savage than the other animals

>>1294968
FYI kangaroos tear each other's testicles off when they fight for a mate

>>1294974
That seems extremely counterproductive.

What?

>>1293551
Everyone loves cultural diversity and it always works f a m just look at RomE.It wOrkED perfectly fOR theM.

File: fate_of_empires_large_0.jpg (278KB, 1000x976px) Image search: [Google]

278KB, 1000x976px

Destroying your empire.

Same, I never thought of it that way
I am #votingforher now

>History channel

They only have shitty reality shows and american propaganda.

Wow, I guess I am now truly #SickforAlaric

>This is why a deep complicity has continued to exist between the form of the ‘nation state’ as international political agent and an economic order based upon the commodification of labour. Since it is of systematic necessity that the economic conditions of an undistorted labour market are accompanied by political crisis, the world order functions as an integrated process based upon the flow of market-priced labour into the metropolis from the Third World (on the basis of the economic form of capital production), and the export of political instability to the Third World from the metropolis (on the basis of the political form of autonomous national sovereignty). The global labour market is easily interpreted, therefore, as a sustained demographic disaster that is systematically displaced away from the political institutions of the metropolis. This process of displacement, which is the ultimate ‘base’ or ‘infrastructure’ of capital accumulation, is dependent upon those issues of ‘kinships’ or ‘marriage organization’ (the sexual economy of gender and race) which Marxists have often tended to consider as surface features of an underlying mode of production.

>These two aspects, the genealogical and the logical, are functions of a position of abstract masculine subjectivity coincident with the patronymic. This position is the proto-cultural fundament of everything that is able to count as the same. The tradition is thus rooted in a communication between culture and population, whose medium is the stability (‘identity’) of the male line. Modernity is not merely a compromise between novel forms of commercially driven social organization and this archaic cultural pattern of patrilineal exogamy, but more fundamentally, a deepening of the compromise already integral to any exogamy that is able to remain patrilineal. It is only by understanding the inhibitive function of patriarchies in relation to exogamic dissipation (an inhibition that is supremely logical in that it conserves identity, and which is for this reason violently xenophobic) that we can make sense of capital production and its tendency towards the peculiar cultural mutation that was baptised by Mussolini as ‘fascism’ . This is because the restriction of cultural synthesis, based upon a strenuous endogamy at the level of the national community, is the ultimate outcome of the concerted ‘liberalization’ of kinship organizations within (metropolitan) industrial societies

>The women of the earth are segmented only by their fathers and husbands. Their praxial fusion is indistinguishable from the struggle against the micro-powers that suppress them most immediately. That is why the proto-fascism of nationality laws and immigration controls tends to have a sexist character as well as a racist one. It is because women are the historical realization of the potentially euphoric synthetic or communicative function which patriarchy both exploits and inhibits that they are invested with a revolutionary destiny, and it is only through their struggle that politics will be able to escape from all fatherlands. (p. 78)
If feminist struggles have been constantly deprioritized in theory and practice it is surely because of their idealistic recoil from the currency of violence, which is to say, from the only definitive ‘matter’ of politics. The state apparatus of an advanced industrial society can certainly not be defeated without a willingness to escalate the cycle of violence without limit. It is a terrible fact that atrocity is not the perversion, but the very motor of such struggles: the language of inexorable political will. A revolutionary war against a modern metropolitan state can only be fought in hell.

>>1293398
The argument is entirely correct.

To get rid of their cognitive dissonance. If you insist that your system is 'perfect' and 'flawless' and reality shows it's any but, you have to resolve the internal conflict in some way.

Apologetics is basically built around this set up. It's basically nothing more than Christians trying to bullshit their way out of the obvious contradictions of their own beliefs

>>1293408
lol this lol

fuck cuckstianity