What's war actually like for a high ranking general? I know they're not supposed to get close to the action like Rommel.
Do they just sit in a tent and move toy soldiers around a map all day?
>>1329554
>a tent
An office.
Chill in a comfy seat staring at maps and eating good food. If your side wins the war you become president, if you lose you kill yourself.
>>1329554
In short, they make grand-scale decisions for their troops by all the information filtered by their subordinates.
The orders will be delivered to lower-level commanders like colonels etc. and so on who actually know how to execute these orders with their regiments, companies etc.
I see these scenarios/"problems" a lot in news media. Are they really a problem? Isn't this an open and shut case?
To me it seems crystal clear what the self-driving car should do in case of an accident. Prioritize the safety of its passengers. When you buy a gun, you don't want it to shoot you when you're in danger. You want the gun to shoot the person I'm targetting. In the case of the car, everyone wants the $50,000 car they bought to protect them. Like everything with self-determination and limited agency, we are all responsible for our own safety. If yours and mine come into conflict, everyone has the natural right to defend themselves. Asking others to die for you seems bit too retarded.
Going completely off, to me, it seems the "problem" is not self-driving cars, but rather liberals/liberal media and their lack of sense of personal responsibility and rights.
In anycase, what's /his/ thoughts on self driving car ethics.
>>1329544
>I see these scenarios/"problems" a lot in news media.
What scenarios you stupid sperg?
>>1329559
http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2013/10/the-ethics-of-autonomous-cars/280360/
Ethics of self-driving car, specifically the actions it should take during accidents that involve multiple humans
>>1329563
It sounds like less of a problem than with human drivers. In fact that article agrees; we have "time to get it right."
>Going completely off, to me, it seems the "problem" is not self-driving cars, but rather liberals/liberal media and their lack of sense of personal responsibility and rights.
Literally what the fuck are you talking about?
Why is Mahan so misunderstood? Is it because people who like military history, especially naval history, tend to be fucking retards?
>>1329462
Who the hell misunderstands Mahan? He articulated a shitty outline for naval strategy, which lasted as long as it did because there weren't competing visions.
>>1329472
Well you did end up answering the question, just not in the way you expected.
>>1329480
Seriously, Mahanian doctrine is shit, not the least because in the 17th and 18th centuries he grounded most of his work on, actually controlling commercial lanes through swapper was nigh impossible.
He completely ignores the effect of the railroad on international commerce and thus power, (explain the rise of Russia in Mahanian theory), and even in its own terms, it's shit.
Show me a conflict in which two opposing navies held their fleets together in one capital ship concentration, attempted to destroy the opposing fleet, and then instituted a blockade? If anything, the reverse continually happened, threats to shipping (usually conducted by small raiders, not capital ships) forced naval engagements, which often didn't otherwise form due to the extreme difficulty in attacking a fleet in port.
In either predictive or reccomendive value, Mahan had little to offer.
Again, who is "misreading" him and how?
You're in Pearl Harbor and this guy slaps your fleet in the ass.
What do you do?
shoot his flight down
Crashing his plane
Patroclus: A nobleman like me buys items, we do not MAKE the items, silly peasant
Now listen here nignog: kek
Now listen here nignog: Noblemen never used longbows.
Patroclus: Y-yes they did
Now listen here nignog: They were literally only used by goddamn vagrants.
Patroclus: FUCK YOU, I'M GOING TO PUT THIS QUESTION ON /HIS/ AND SEE IF I GET ANY ANSWERS
Did European noblemen use longbows, /his/?
Please leave this board and never return.
>>1329387
Pepexit.
So tell me /his/, who's your favorite presocratic philosopher and master of thought ?
Absolutely Heraclitus
Solomon
>>1329384
Thales.
>Ancient Egyptians
>Black
>Ancient Egyptians
>Arab
>>1329311
Egyptians aren't even white or black. So, with that out of the way, who the fuck are they?
>>1329311
>ancient white egypt
WE
"Arab" is an umbrella term for nearly all Middle-Eastern Semites post-Mohammad.
So they're technically Arab according to the modern viewpoint of what constitutes an Arab.
Game: you get to start out in 1499, January. Any country of your choice.
You are allowed to bring as much as you can carry.
Wat do?
England because I speak the language. Bring a few lenses, beat Galileo and Kepler to the telescope, build optical telegraph, profit immensely.
>>1329366
Have fun getting burned at the stake.
>>1329411
You are actually retarded
lads, please explain to me why Hitler attacked his European neighbours.
I understand German nationalism.
I understand wanting a Reich.
I don't understand why he thought he needed the whole of Europe.
He didn't want it and he didn't attack it. Britain and France declared war on Germany.
>>1329302
what about Czechoslovakia and Poland?
He wanted "living space" for the German people. Basically, it was really trendy at the time to be isolationist and want to create a nation that was completely self-sufficient and wouldn't have to depend on any kind of trade to survive and prosper, and Germany, such as it was at the time, had a very high population relative to the amount of food that it produced and was heavily dependent on trade. Hitler invaded Poland so he could add all of that fertile farmland to his domains to freely redistribute to the German people, spread them out a bit, and make sure Germany could produce everything its people needed. It was for these same reasons that Japan expanded into mainland Asia and the tropical islands to the south.
Is it a part of Europe?
>>1329204
In my opinion, only the Western portion belongs to it. As for the Eastern portion, that belongs to Southwest Asia.
its actually its own continent.
>>1329211
Agreed. Like including the eastern portion would be like including Africa because of the north part.
Hey /his/, sorry of this has been posted before.
Ive been studying the early half of the second world war and came across a plan from the German High Command for Operation Sea Lion (The invasion of Britain).
Was there ever any possible way for Germany to have a decisive victory had they attempted this?
Even if they could not have ever been successful in such a task, what could realistically be the best possible outcome for the Germans in such a scenario?
Also, if Sea Lion would have happen what would change about the second world war interns of length, causalities, war in the eastern front, etc?
>pic not really related
>>1329175
>Was there ever any possible way for Germany to have a decisive victory had they attempted this?
No. They didn't even have sufficient landing crafts and planned to transfer the majority of their troops through the English channel with what are essentially converted river barges. Even if they had air superiority over the channel, the landing still would have failed due to the overwhelming power of the Royal Navy.
With the way Germans were planning on transporting troops, all it takes is one destroyer to pass through the defense net and the invasion would suffer heavy casualties and be forced to be abandoned.
>>1329194
Thanks so much for reading my thread and responding,
I also heard that a main problem with the landing was the fact that much of the German forces were still hours-drawn. Getting all those houses and equipment in old time boats would have been a nightmare.
To these problems, did the German high command have any solutions?
>>1329216
>To these problems, did the German high command have any solutions?
Their solution was abandoning the landing itself.
It was virtually impossible until either the Kriegsmarine is expanded large enough to win surface naval battles against the Royal Navy which will take many years, which was dangerous for the German economy unless they somehow win against the USSR. The other parts are not difficult problems if they can beat the Royal Navy, which was the big hurdle.
Was it autism?
>>1329130
The only thing autistic here is the continued insistence on the part of Bolivia to keep a "navy"
>>1329163
are you familiar with peruvian autism?
Starting University soon. Should I major in history?
>>1329127
Might as well, if it interests you.
You're just as likely to end up Jobless even if you fall for the STEM meme.
>>1329127
If you have a plan of what to do with it then yes
and I'm not just talking about teaching history, there's other things the skills you gain from history can translate to
>>1329127
Absolutely not, no money there. As a matter of fact, don't go to university at all unless you KNOW what you want to do. Otherwise shoot for the stars getting an internship or taking one of your productive hobbies very seriously.
Go out and volunteer at a dig site or museum if you want to do /his/ related stuff just to get your toes wet.
Ok /his, post ur Unit 731 pics/ sources here, let it rain!
>>1329101
Never happened
>>1329151
Those nips are fucked up
It's pretty clear the Chinese weren't going to stop them, so why did the Abbasids stop pushing east after Talas? Did they just think the area wasn't worth conquering?
>>1328972
Abbasids were already over-extended.
Note how Turks did most of the fighting for them.
Too far away from home.
Supply lines were already stretched bare, and at that point they'd be stretching onto where the Chinese were stronger, while becoming increasingly weaker.
My history professor stressed the imporatance of the Cavalry tactics of the Muslims as the reasons for failing to stretch farther into India and for the loss against the Franks at Tours, but I don't know how credible that is.
>>1328972
The Abbasids won at Talas because the local Tarlaks switched sides and helped them out.
Then, for reasons I'm not entirely clear on, they went back to Tang Cinese ocerlordship, at least until the An Lushan rebellion.