[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Archived threads in /his/ - History & Humanities - 332. page

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

File: IMG_2033.jpg (87KB, 602x402px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_2033.jpg
87KB, 602x402px
The United States joins the axis

How does WW2 play out?
24 posts and 2 images submitted.
>>
>>3241444
Germany joins the Allies
How does WW2 play out?
>>
>>3241448
In both scenarios, the communist filth of an ideology is wiped out from the face of this earth.
>>
>>3241444
Why would the US join the Axis? You have to go back and explain this. You can get a military coup into a fascist-ish dictatorship in the 1930s, but such a state would still likely be friendly towards Britain and hostile towards Japan.

>>3241448
So uh the entire world against Italy and Japan?

File: IMG_2142.jpg (29KB, 300x400px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_2142.jpg
29KB, 300x400px
Would he have made every man a king?
31 posts and 4 images submitted.
>>
yes he would have literally crowned every man in America and given them titles

in Huey Long's America, instead of 'Mr. ___', you would address others as 'King ___'
>>
>>3241307
Could some people be Dukes, Princes, Etc.?
>>
>>3241307
>>3241347
Epic joke my Redditbros, make sure to include me in the /r/4chan screencap

File: roman-consul.jpg (38KB, 356x450px) Image search: [Google]
roman-consul.jpg
38KB, 356x450px
Romans, Carthaginians, Sparta. Why did the model of 2 or more co-equal leaders vanish? Is the concept worth revisiting?
22 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
>>3241237
because some empires aren't big enough for 2 people to rule. most empires prefer just 1 ruler.
>>
>>3241237
There still is separation of powers in basically all government systems.
>>
>>3241274

But there are no co-presidents.

File: IMG_0403.jpg (28KB, 380x370px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_0403.jpg
28KB, 380x370px
>wages conventional war with enemy he knew well was more industrialized and able to muster more men

>catastrophic losses and dying spirit following even his proudest victories does not deter him from doing the same thing for three years until he surrenders

>effective commander of rebel army and Davis' most trusted and favorite general, sees no need for the duration of his command to act independently of offensive-based grand strategy authored by Richmond in spite its evident flaws and seeing subordinates carry out irregular warfare with monumental efficaciousness

>saw Mexico fail in open field battles and succeed in guerrilla warfare and learns nothing from it
Even his proudest victory, Chancellorsville, saw no less than a quarter of his men killed, captured, or wounded. Why is Lee always looked on as such a brilliant mind in literally every post-war narrative?
11 posts and 2 images submitted.
>>
File: Bloody-bill-anderson.jpg (87KB, 442x561px) Image search: [Google]
Bloody-bill-anderson.jpg
87KB, 442x561px
>saw Mexico fail in open field battles and succeed in guerrilla warfare and learns nothing from it

if he did, and the Confederates fell back into a bushwhacking/guerrilla campaign, shit would be real messy into the 1870s
>>
Gorilla warfare is most effective when you have a conventional army as well, to distract the attention of the enemy and keep them occupied as their rear is annihilated.

That said, Lee is indeed overrated as a general.
>>
>>3241220
guerrilla warfare only works if you are fighting enemies with some humanity and morals
this was not the case with the Union

File: maxresdefault[1].jpg (92KB, 1440x1080px) Image search: [Google]
maxresdefault[1].jpg
92KB, 1440x1080px
After WW1, why was Italy given so little land, considering how many battles of the Isonzo they fought?
Surely they wanted more, had asked for more, expected more, and eventually tried to get more. This should've been obvious.
The central powers were gutted so hard in all other ways, but were spared where Italian ambitions were concerned.
46 posts and 5 images submitted.
>>
I was always under the impression they were seen as somewhat of a front runner and never fully invested until they saw a winning side emerging.

I think they were also previously aligned with AH and Germany prior to the breakout of war.

They were basically the guy on the side who yells world star while two other guys fight - that doesn't net you much cache at the bargaining table.
>>
>>3241130
Italy had an alliance with AH & Germany but claimed they didn't have to honour the alliance because AH declared war on Serbia first
>>
>>3241120
At the bargaining table after the war, Italy's represrntative, Orlando, embarrassed the nation but whining like a cry baby at how she deserved more for her minor efforts in WWI than what she got. Lloyd George even said something to the effect that if his children had acted how Orlando did, they would have been spanked.

Also want to mention that Italy started the war being a part of the Triple Alliance and didn't have the same industrial capacities as France, Germany or the UK so wasn't considered a major player.

File: 690px-Map-Africa-Regions.png (344KB, 690x717px) Image search: [Google]
690px-Map-Africa-Regions.png
344KB, 690x717px
Lets say a great emperor was able to conquer and unite Africa under one rule before the Europeans arrived. Would Africa be able to fend them off?

Please no /pol/
12 posts and 2 images submitted.
>>
>>3240980
Probably not since various European powers, including Ottomans, are going to attack them from all sides of Africa.
>>
>>3240980
ASB
>>
>>3240980
It might depend on if the African empire could stay unified long enough to ward off Europeans. Although even if it was, I doubt it could considering the Opium wars in which Britain defeated the rather solid Qing dynasty.

File: 1493942274176.jpg (81KB, 402x555px) Image search: [Google]
1493942274176.jpg
81KB, 402x555px
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n9aYrURLHh0
15 posts and 3 images submitted.
>>
File: brain.jpg (103KB, 896x444px) Image search: [Google]
brain.jpg
103KB, 896x444px
0/0
also attila didn't really plunder persia as the arrows imply
>>
>>3240721
I find it amusing that Brain draws the wrong conclusions from his "meticulous analysis of history".

1: You absolutely need world alliances if you wish to conquer the world. Cleopatra committed suicide after Mark Antony (one of the leaders of the belligerent factions during the Last War of the Roman Republic and her lover) was killed in battle (Antony also had married Octavian's sister but continued his affair with Cleopatra, which strained tensions in the Triumvirate and got Cleopatra dragged down when Antony was). Largely, Cleopatra wasn't ambitious enough or present enough in Rome to match Octavian's efforts, and didn't identify which alliances would benefit her most. Allies are largely what got her so far in the first place. Shunning world alliances to try to command everyone's appliances would be a disastrous mistake.
>>
>>3241005
2: Hannibal is one of antiquity's foremost military commanders. He lost in the end not because of any tactical error involving war elephants, but because the loss of support for the war back in Carthage and the attritive, guerrilla tactics the Romans used against him combined to gradually wear down his army until it was incapable of securing a major victory. If anything, Hannibal should be a lesson that you can't win a war without the support of your people back home to pay for and supply your armies in the field. In this case, Brain is correct that he can and should use the television to be admired if he wants to be successful, but in incorrect is discarding the foremost weapons of the time in favor of exclusively having popular support and political power (which contrasts with his conclusion from Cleopatra: that alliances and political maneuvering are unimportant to world conquest.) He's also wrong, in the facts anyway, since Hannibal more than made it past the Roman Sentinels, marching his army to attack from an unexpected direction and securing quick victories early on. It was only once he lost support for the war that things really went south.

File: democracy-means-everyone.jpg (143KB, 1200x628px) Image search: [Google]
democracy-means-everyone.jpg
143KB, 1200x628px
Why did it take so long for Democracy to take hold in the world?

After the abortive start in Greece, why didn't peasants figure out that having a say in their government was beneficial to them?
53 posts and 10 images submitted.
>>
File: image.png (536KB, 1713x1230px) Image search: [Google]
image.png
536KB, 1713x1230px
>>3240570
When the financiers, banksters and other practicioners of the Jewish sciences realized it would be the best method by which to turn the world into a giant bazaar. Some time between 1900 and 1990.
>>
>>3240573
Cont. basicallt peasants are retarded and don't know what's good for them. "Democracy" (aka rule by marketers) certainly isn't. But the mercantile class had largely convinced them that it is, and that's why we are where we are today.
>>
File: City State.jpg (317KB, 1240x796px) Image search: [Google]
City State.jpg
317KB, 1240x796px
>>3240570
Because le positivist view of history.

Popular governments resembling didn't "start" in greece. In fact that shit was everywhere and existed in some form over time.

Ok sure you had Greek City states. But also
>Italic City State republics
>Carthage was a fucking republic
>Medieval City State Republics
>Medieval chartered cities whose citizens were ruled via a representative democracy in a council
>Chinese villages and towns meeting in Kongsis (Clan Halls) where every male members of every family decided on matters.
>Village Councils in Japan

The problem with democracy is for the longest time, it was too fucking small a government structure to do anything beyond the city-state level. Modernity and assorted 18th and 19th Century memes(Rights of Man = fostered franchise and participation in government as part of their rights. Nationalism = fostered that members of a meme nation have to get a say on how they are governed) only allowed for democracy to be as widespread as it is today.

File: diocletian.jpg (726KB, 960x1280px) Image search: [Google]
diocletian.jpg
726KB, 960x1280px
ITT: Underrated rulers of history
20 posts and 8 images submitted.
>>
>>3240376
He persecuted millions of Christians.
>>
GOAT PM
>>
>>3240398
>Longest serving PM but forgotten by his own party
>Outstanding political career but somewhat anti-social personal life
>Remembered mostly as the 50$ guy

Truly underrated.

File: hAOcn5S.jpg (768KB, 2165x3000px) Image search: [Google]
hAOcn5S.jpg
768KB, 2165x3000px
Someone on /pol/ today pointed out that America's involvement in WW2 was a direct result of Japan's actions, thus leading Nazi Germany to declare war on the U.S.

How did the U.S. feel about Nazi Germany prior to that? Had Japan/Nazi Germany never provoked the United States, could the U.S. have remained neutral?
27 posts and 2 images submitted.
>>
>>3240274
For both WW1 and WW2 if the USA had had Republicans in office it would have leaned towards Germany or remained neutral.
>>
The US government was already inching closer and closer to getting involved in the European Theater, that's why Hitler was quite happy to have them enter the war so he could launch Operation Drumbeat and hit the previously neutral ships supplying Britain
>>
We were probably still sore over the Zimmerman Telegraph.

File: Heidegger II.jpg (40KB, 484x578px) Image search: [Google]
Heidegger II.jpg
40KB, 484x578px
How come the most important philospher of the 20th century was a nazi?
19 posts and 6 images submitted.
>>
But... I'm a Nazi too. That would mean... I'm as smart as the most important philosopher of the 20th Century, if not more intelligent.
>>
Heidegger isn't important people just thought he was
>>
>>3240200
Care to elaborate?
He virtually created Existencialism and was proto-structuralism(Derrida's deconstruction term comes from Heidegger's destruction)
He also ended Gnosiology.

File: NO_FILE_GIVEN (0B, 0x0pxpx)
NO_FILE_GIVEN
0B, 0x0pxpx
Why do some people here believe that Northern Europeans ever saw the Romans or Greeks as their literal ancestors?
15 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
>>3240139
>Be European
>Rome and Greece are in Europe
>My ancestors :)
>>
>>3240157
Thats maybe how it works for Amerimutts, to Europeans this is just plain bullshit.
>>
>>3240139
Probably because both of them were white, had the same religion, spoke the same language, and lived in the same place

File: 1405550307203.jpg (15KB, 238x286px) Image search: [Google]
1405550307203.jpg
15KB, 238x286px
You get to bring back three historic ethnic groups.
Choose. Now.
23 posts and 4 images submitted.
>>
Berber, Latin, mainland celts
>>
File: 800px-Codex-Gigas-Devil-enhanced.jpg (215KB, 800x1252px) Image search: [Google]
800px-Codex-Gigas-Devil-enhanced.jpg
215KB, 800x1252px
>>3240091
Huns, Vandals, and Goths, and then I'd ask them to destroy this society we live in.
>>
>>3240091
>Tang Chinese
>Western Norse
>Entwives

File: revolutionary of peace.jpg (22KB, 302x375px) Image search: [Google]
revolutionary of peace.jpg
22KB, 302x375px
*destroys your democracy*
38 posts and 11 images submitted.
>>
yeah, the democratically-elected czar was doing a great job
>>
File: Soviets.jpg (59KB, 500x1103px) Image search: [Google]
Soviets.jpg
59KB, 500x1103px
>>3240064
destroys his democracy*
>>
>>3240103
>>3240106
Bolsheviks didn't revolt against Tsar you historically illiterate dummies. They staged a revolt against Russian Republic.

File: maxresdefault.jpg (148KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
maxresdefault.jpg
148KB, 1920x1080px
>There are no perfect history podc-
60 posts and 13 images submitted.
>>
File: 1501853926343.jpg (22KB, 540x527px) Image search: [Google]
1501853926343.jpg
22KB, 540x527px
>>3239937
Get the fuck out with the low tier b8
>>
>>3239937
John Green is a blight
>>
>>3239937
>much noble savage meme
>Greeks would've been better off being conquered by Persians because they were le progressive!
>Islam dindu nuffin and has done nothing since (crusades were super terrible though)

Pages: [First page] [Previous page] [322] [323] [324] [325] [326] [327] [328] [329] [330] [331] [332] [333] [334] [335] [336] [337] [338] [339] [340] [341] [342] [Next page] [Last page]

[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.