Archived threads in /his/ - History & Humanities - 3285. page

>>1379473
At first glance I thought that was a row of Mosins being worshipped

File: brayford.jpg (197KB, 1024x678px) Image search: [Google]

197KB, 1024x678px

>>1378618

>>1378277
Prod it.

>>1378277

Call to the police.
Century old explosives are really dangerous.

>>1378277
There's no explosive in there, at least not in the sense of the actual artillery shell. If anything ever happened it would just make sparks. You're fine.

> but has there ever been a thinker who contributed more to western thinking and the fundamentals of science?
Bacon, Hume, Popper
>his works continue to be relevant
lol

>>1378269
Dear anon, here is a thought experiment: without this Aristotle how much thinking and fundamentals of science would not be as it is today.

I think the contribution to Western thinking is more integrated into our culture psyche as it is to science from this man Aristotle.

>>1378291

All respond explicitly to his work. Without Aristotle there would be no enlightenment because there would be no theory so comprehensive and compelling to merit such a response.

>>1378249

Haha, great post.

Well memed, friend.

>>1378247
Cool story, bro.

>>1378255
You left yourself wide open. But to answer your question, I wouldn't waste my time visiting a place just to imagine what was there.

.t KoRn

>>1378054
danger and play is what women are and want [they want play = safe danger] and men want women, but only because women are the ultimate danger and play thing, so that when they believe to have dominated women, they feel valued. This is nice, but you can reach a life beyond this.

once you understand that men are not meant to be as good hedonist as women, you first acknowledge the superiority of women at the hedonistic life (which is just called life by men and women) and you see the misery of hedonism, either the direct hedonism of the woman, or the nihilistic fantasy of the delayed hedonism [hedonism of the will] of the man [the one that men advocate for, the one about engaging yourself into challenges after challenges, seeking merit, pursuing your passions, in one word still clinging to entertainment (typically to attract women sooner or later) to better turn away from their impotency at the hedonistic life..] created by men once they get beat by women.
Once you see the game as well as the noneffective masculine life, you lose faith in hedonism. At this point, you either see the solution or not {Nietzsche did not see it, or rather he did not claim explicitly that he saw it]: you strive to do the exact opposite of hedonism (either the masculine one or the feminine one): first you stop being nihilistic, in accepting what you are (it is crucial to be sincere about the starting point], meaning a worm, and in stopping to analyze the past to get a better future (= the strategy of men, which remains inside hedonism (even though they claim that it is not, and in practice is is clearly not), but even more nihilistic than the feminine hedonism, once they are beaten by women] and in stopping to take what you desire, feel and think seriously [=the hedonism of the woman, and the fueling of this hedonism by men].

>>1378056
Women are wrong for having faith in what they desire, in thinking that this is relevant to ones life
they are a bit wrong to let men spend their life trying to serve women.

Men are wrong to try to play with women, which is just serving women
men are wrong, after being defeated, to be resentful towards women
men are wrong to think, after being defeated, that the solution is to be even more nihilistic than women in dwelling in hedonism of the will

The lack of efficacy of the masculine life leads to a narcissism (contrary to men), but without egotism (contrary to women), a more equanimous and benevolent stance towards what is desired, felt and thought. At this point, you stop looking at hedonism of the body [=the feminine hedonism], turn towards hedonism of the soul [what religious call it], spirit, consciousness [what buddhists call it] [=the hedonism of the mild ascetic, the hedonism that most men fail to see and the one that women love to think that they embody (women love to think that they are not as egotistic as they are, that they embody a humanist stance)] and then you understand that even this is doomed to be disappointing, so you refuse it until you stop caring about this one too.

Depends on which god you're talking about.

>>1377833
The traditional monotheistic judeo-christian god

>>1377837
Well in that case because if you don't he'll literally burn you for all eternity.

>>1377678
No.

Nigger, he litterally believed in magic.

>>1377678
Yes. About everything.

He was successful because he drove off the imperialists of France, Greece, and Britain and he rallied the people under Turkish nationalism.

>>1377463
>desire a secular revolution since childhood
>acquire military fame
>istanbul is occupied and it creates power vacuum
>have foresight, "lel, you representatives are going to get captured in istanbul, come back to ankara you dumbasses"
>they get captured and sent to malta and etc
>power vacuum sucks his cock even better
>outplay everyone politically
>threats from outside enable him to take the lead and silence the opposition (happened 2-3 times when he needed it most)
>thank english senpai for giving victories

also it must be noted that many of the educated people were soldiers. they had modern education and were quite useful in this chaos.

>muh modernization
also laicism to shut up the extremists and rabble rousers

>>1377394
Waco was a good example of why acting belligerent with the authorities in a heavily armed nation can be a dangerous activity

>>1377394
The government did nothing wrong.

>>1377410
That day they was out spreading the word of Democracy and freedom?

>>1377363
Isn't the basis of Christianity that mankind is inherently wicked and hopeless without God?

Where's the disconnect?

>>1377363
Your observation is correct.

if you dive a little deeper into just the smaller actions of early Christians, the church practices were mostly seen as fucking insane by the people.

during the earliest days, the Church required circumcision as mandatory for becoming Christian as they still kept with the Abrahamic Covenant.

Apparently telling 30+ year old men to slice off their foreskin with no anesthetic is not a fantastic way to get many takers for your new religion, and the circumcision requirement was only done away with after decades of debate.

>>1377231
>analizable
Also, kill yourself.

File: ok.jpg (4KB, 250x148px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 250x148px

>>1377235
Sorry if my english aint perfect

>>1377231
>What do you think of vaporwave?
there's a board for music, m8
vaporwave is shit btw

File: Psalm 23.jpg (283KB, 736x1066px) Image search: [Google]

283KB, 736x1066px

>>1377184
The KJV is the most enjoyable imo but it lacks material from the Dead Sea Scrolls.

The RSV is good.

>>1377211
Call me a pleb, but I found the KJV pretty impenetrable. The language was clear, but a massive chore to read.

File: Then and Now.jpg (122KB, 540x668px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 540x668px

>>1377216
You are a pleb. Also I don't understand; was the language impenetrable or clear?

The morality of Hell can only be reconciled if God actually left clues people just chose to ignore. If such a being were actually not provable, Hell would be even more cruel than it already is.

>>1376980
His existence or lack thereof would tell us a lot about the human condition and our greater purpose.

File: 3539AF3E00000578-0-image-a-3_1465826575537.jpg (52KB, 634x457px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 634x457px

>>1376980
>The first signs of a particle heavier than the Higgs boson was seen at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) back in December.
Unexplained by current models, its existence might lead to the discovery of a whole new set of particles and possibly even a fifth fundamental force.

The Standard Model claims everything in the universe is made from the most basic building blocks called fundamental particles, that are governed by four forces: gravity, electromagnetic, weak nuclear and strong nuclear.
The forces work over different ranges and have different strengths.
This new particle, if it exists, would not fit into the description given by the Standard Model and so would lead to a whole new area of particle physics for them to explore.

>>1376908
infallible

>>1376909
Go away Luther.

>>1376908
Utterly faultless.

>>1376819
Why doesn't anyone bring up Roman, Greek and Persian colonialism? They're far in the past.

>>1376865
Why doesn't anyone bring up Assyrian colonialism?

>>1376883
That's even further.