Post creepy people from history. This guy was pretty much what would happen if someone worshipped Khorne in real life.
Requesting that weird french guy who could eat everything all the time during some war. I forgot his name.
>>1382524
Tarrare
>>1382497
Not history but I once met a girl's vagina that would be an avatar of Nurgle.
Hey, can christo-/his/'s collective knowledge help me with something?
I once read a quote by an Indian or eastern Asian (don't remember it exactly) Guru/ Priest/ Spiritual teacher, that said something along the lines of, that people should follow their own western philosophies/ religions/ teachers, instead of making pilgrimages to the east.
Does anyone know who said that? It would be very helpful for something I want to write...
The Dalai Lama said :
People from different traditions should keep their own, rather than change. However, some Tibetan may prefer Islam, so he can follow it. Some Spanish prefer Buddhism; so follow it. But think about it carefully. Don’t do it for fashion. Some people start Christian, follow Islam, then Buddhism, then nothing.”
https://zenit.org/articles/dalai-lama-asks-west-not-to-turn-buddhism-into-a-fashion/
Is that what you are thinking of?
>>1382875
I think what Lhamo here's getting at is that there is indeed a difference between some clueless Buddhaboo taking no home traditions into consideration before seeking elsewhere and finding the traditions that you're born in wanting after exploration and then seeking elsewhere.
>>1382460
>From the Article "Resemblances Between the Buddhist and Roman Catholic Religions."
"The Tibetan lama listened respectfully to the Jesuit priest [Father Huc] and replied, "Your religion is the same as ours.
>The Atlantic Monthy (Dec 1870)
How true is this image?
>>1382397
There weren't any dinosaurs and the numbers are disproportionate.
what is poland doing?
>>1382397
Italy's dinosaur is bigger than Japan's, how laughably inaccurate.
> What is consciousness? What is a true awakening? That's a complex question but it's really simple when you look at through a historical-cultural lens. Consciousness is our entire cultural genetic experience as a specie is stretching back into the mist of time through our instincts and through our genetics up until this point.
> The great lie is that we are just these alone individuals. We are individuals but we carry with us the hope, the dreams, the passions, the sins, but also the great works, and the love of those that came before us. We are them.
> And we have that love of those in the past and that electric connection to the present focusing forward into the future and when you don’t have a sense of the space-time continuum, or the journey and its mission, if you don’t have a sense of believing in the species, and believing in its survival and believing in its ascension, then you have cut yourself off from what it means to be human.
> And that's the big globalist virus. Is to make you cynical, to make you hateful, to never let you go through rites of passage when you're young, to never go through cultural rituals that are meant to release chemical reactions in the brain that unlock race memories, consciousness memories that are far beyond the limited state of instincts, to allow you as a current sentient being, to commune and and experience all of the genetic wealth and history and thought and dreams of those before you.
Jones confirmed for Lamarckian shill.
>>1382382
>Alex Jones
D R O P P E D
R
O
P
P
E
D
>muh filters
Historically speaking, what is the ideological basis behind pan-turanist thought on the european continent?
By studying the ethnogenesis and pantheon/mystic pre-christian folk religion of the magyar people, it should become abundantly clear that said spiritual conceptions are heavily inspired by norse germanic cultural area.
Despite this, the pan-turanist ideologues do these incredible mental gymnastics where they somehow link all of these european archetypes and folklore traditions to some asian steppe tribes in bumfuck nowhere somewhere behind the urals. And all this based on some vague supposed linguistical links between magyars and said asian steppe peoples - Nevermind the fact that genetically speaking they have nothing whatsofuckingever in common!
So why is this, how did these claims came to be in the first place? Pan-turanism strikes me as even more absurd and illogical than pan-slavism. At least with pan-slavism there's somewhat of a consistant geographical link (even though a "slavic race" as such of course never existed), but in the case of pan-turanism we are literally talking entire continents from the postuled "source population" apart.
>>1382286
Pan-anything is a fucking meme, mostly used as a basis for imperialism.
>>1382313
because "make WEWUZ great again"
linguistic connection between hungarian and turkic languages is indisputable
Is he one of the more overrated leaders from human history?
His military plans seem to have been ripe for failure whenever they weren't massively overhauled by his own marshals and generals and his speeches, the main point he is remembered as a great leader, don't seem to have had much impact.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/history/britain-at-war/10255153/Winston-Churchills-speeches-were-overrated-and-some-went-down-badly.html
His accomplishment is losing the British empire and submitting to America, the only time a dominant power ever abandoned its position to another willingly.
So yes he's pretty overrated.
>>1382233
Britain was not the dominant power by any stretch of imagination.
>>1382237
They weren't since the 1890's at least
They entered the First World war to reverse that and got the Opposite result
Britain has the likes of Newton, Turing, Maxwell and Faraday.
Germany has the likes of Gauss, Planck, Leibniz and Euler
Where are their French equivalents? Why is it that the nation that was once the most populous and wealthiest country in Europe is so underrepresented in pretty much any list of the greatest scientists, mathematicians etc.? What limitations did France have that only made them capable of producing second tier scientists like Pascal and Descartes that are entirely outclassed by their German and British counterparts? Is it culture? Work ethic?
>>1382155
So I guess you're going to pretend you don't know of the Curies and Pasteur?
pascal, lavoisier, coulomb and pasteur
>>1382168
>the Curies
the credit should go to Becquerel but it went to meme curie because she had a vaj
I can't believe this thread exists.
what are some of your favorites? I watch a ton of the great war and forgotten weapons.
OmniPhi Media
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NEIlXvlvXMA
Ok I now this is a controversial opinion and I will get backlash, but hear me out:
>John
>Green
William Lane Craig likes to show that Jesus rose from the dead as inference to the best explanation.
I have to admit that after looking into it thoroughly, it is indeed the "best explanation". However, so what?
History is very long, and the evidence is massively flawed. Under materialism, history is some sort of chaotic deterministic system. Every now and then, of course an event will happen such that the remaining evidence results in the best explanation being miraculous.
The point he makes is that because it is the best explanation, it is not irrational to believe it.
Of course you're free to disbelieve but a common characterization of Christians is that their entire belief system is irrational and based on a leap of faith. On the contrary, it is entirely reasonable.
>>1382028
Isn't it indeed a "leap of faith" to view history through the lens of miracles being possible? Since the evidence in history is so faulty, surely we should use the assumption that the physical laws we know today have always applied?
>>1382030
Christianity doesn't state that these physical laws don't apply, rather that God exists and he can brake them. If you're not God, there is no way around them, they apply absolutely.
Why does /his/ hate the Byzantine Empire so much?
>>1381693
Fucking wannabe Greeks.
Literally "We Wuz Romans" for the Greeks
WE WUZ ROMANZ N SHIT
JESUS DINDU NUFFIN HE A GOOD JEW
People these days always use the 50's as a scapegoat for a very conservative and sexist period of time. Is that an accurate portrayal though?
People these days a God damn idiots.
>>1381615
duh
>>1381615
Because it was, for one, but it's also the most conservative era with contemporary mass media. Reactionaries see it as the "good ol days" due to heavily censored and idealized media and everyone else sees it as a shitty era where nobody was free to be themselves.
How do you feel about the execution of the Romanov family /his/?
Shit happens. I don't have any strong feelings either way.
I feel a little bad for the Tsarevich.
>>1381596
It was needlessly brutal and did not serve much purpose other then the satisfaction of psychpaths
>>1381603
Firing squad is probably the least brutal way to carry out a mass execution.
How do I find my heraldry? And check it?
>The coat of arms of the Northampton and Hampshire Knights are probably the oldest grants which have been bestowed upon the family. They are described, in the order named, as follows (Burke, Heraldry, 1844);
>Arms.--"Argent, on a fesse between three bulls' heads erased sable, armed and ringed at the nose or, a fret between the two doves of the field"
>Crest.--"A dexter arm embowed, vested bendy wavy sinister of four or and gules, supporting with the hand a sword in pale the point resting on the wreath, the pommel surmounting a pair of spurs proper."
>Arms,II.--"Argent, three pales gules, on a canton of the second spur or, withing the bordure engrailed azure."
>Crest.--"On a ducal coronet gules, an eagle displayed or."
Bibliography.
>Burke. Encyclopedia of Heraldry. 1844
>Heitman. Officers of the Continental Army. 1914
>The Americana. 1914
>Savage. A Genealogical Dictionary of New England. 1860
>J.C Martindale. Knight Family. 1911
>Leigh and Knight. Chawton Manor. 1911
>Gentry. Family Names. 1892
>Barber. A history of the parishes of lynton and countisbury. 1907
If I take this somewhere will they be able to give me a copy of it?
Arms are awarded to individuals, not to families
>>1381578
Yeah lets argue semantics, thanks for the bump I guess. They are passed down through their family. So they are awarded to the family as they last longer than the individual.
Idiot.
"The American Way of Living" is my favorite picture of all time. In this photo, ideology is shown in it's purest form. In the background, you have the large, encompassing drawing of the upper-middle class white family smiling towards a bright future, meanwhile lines of text convey nationalistic statements about some "American" lifestyle, and that this lifestyle is somehow statistically the most preferable way to live. Below the propaganda is the true economic reality of the moment, namely that this is a lower-class black community completely destroyed, (due to a lack of infrastructural resources provided by the government) by a natural disaster. Interestingly enough, the poster is the largest thing in this picture. In the same way, the spectacle that is ideology is always the most visible thing in our society. Although the reality is that the small majority of middle to upper class (predominately white) communities are not at all a true representation of the totality of the American experience and lifestyle, this sect is what we predominately see within the spectacle. As an aside, yes there is media depiction of inner-city realities however it is always viewed as a glimpse into the Other. What is unfathomable is the full embrace of this lifestyle as a fundamental part of our American experience. Media such as The Wire and most of hip hop music will always exist however they will never be 'the thing.' What I mean is that it will always be a split from the majority of American media as a cold reminder that is destined to be forgotten on a political level by the viewer.
>>1381566
cont'd:
The 'real' of media will always be, to use an example, the classic sitcom stucture of however many white people having economically meaningless problems while we rarely see them at their jobs. This realm of American media is also inhabited by the poster we see in "The American Way of Living." To bring this full circle, although the political reality of a nation at any time may not reflect the picture displayed by the spectacle, the spectacle's picture will by its very nature be larger than the reality (in our current environment, at least). An interesting thing to consider is whether or not this photo would have gained any traction without the presence of the propagandist poster; I would contend that it wouldn't. This is because without the poster, it comes off as a bland statement of "what we already know," that being that some abstracted American community lives a worse life than us that we can easily mentally push aside, basically the same thing I'm talking about when I mention media such as hip hop and the Wire. The notoriety must stem from the forced recognition that the spectacle does not represent reality, in this way the photo is either intentionally or unintentionally a revolutionary piece.
>>1381586
Interesting opinion bre, now investigate it from the short comings equally faced by chinese and other asian immigrants and how they succeeded as a demographic.
>One of his main things is making fun of historical inaccuracies in movies
>Starts writing a comic book about the Second Punic war
>From the start he admits it's full of historical inaccuracies because "it makes for a better story"
Always this
>>1381510
When did he say that?
>One of his main things is making fun of historical inaccuracies in movies
Completely different things. Lloyd nitpics about having modern roads in Gladiator and stuff like that
Did having modern roads have an essential part in Gladiator? No. It was a mistake.
Other things like wrong wheat, the term vikings, bad furniture etc etc none of them are essential to the story and are just mistakes.
>>1381510
so? he is just making fun of himself. it's something lot's of people lack nowdays