Archived threads in /his/ - History & Humanities - 3237. page

Cogito ergo sum

I think so

I know that my mind is real because it perceives information

Because very, very few people in the world are actually interested in history beyond a superficial level.

>>1399085
Then why come to the history board is it really that funny

Make quality threads instead of shitty meta complaining threads then dumb faggot

[citation needed]

File: 1422254677741.gif (3MB, 257x212px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 257x212px

>people in a hard-science field that relies on empirical evidence and other concepts entirely divorced from human biases/emotions and are right wing
>people in a soft-science field full of memes and feelings are left wing

Golly gee I wonder why

>>1399069
Where'd you get this info?

Because the eternal Anglo wanted a puppet buffer state on the continent after the Napoleonic Wars.

Catholic/Protestant divide in the Netherlands

Because Britain didn't want France to have that land.

No individual person is, or ever really has been all that powerful.

>>1395207
The question was who was THE MOST powerful, not who was ALL-POWERFUL. Learn to read, please - it is /his.

>>1395227
>Most powerful person
Mark Zuckerberg
>How do I beat him
You can't. Roll over and accept the new order.

>"might makes right": the religion

>>1409658
Behold!
Bait!

Is this a topic for discussion, your Catechism notes, or just your blog?

>>1409676
A topic for discussion.

He always was God. The rest of the gods are merely his fallen angels.

>>1409361
The Jews killed the other god's worshipers and so they lost power.

Think American Gods but with more sand niggers.

>>1409378
So the Holocaust was really an attempt to kill Yahweh?

yeah read textbooks why not

University textbooks are designed to give you an introduction, which if youre starting out is what you want.

>>1409094
Lol most of the people who take classes that require those textbooks don't even read them.

yes also the earth is flat and only 6,000 years old and the holocaust is a hoax

It would have been harder to fake the moon landing than it would have been to just go there and do it for real.

>>1408863
No.
Soviets later admitted that it was them who deliberately started the conspiracy theory.

By ending liberal capitalism and democracy.

You would have to abandon the desire for progress and growth and revert to a subsistence level of survival. In that state people will be desperate enough for escapism that they will return to mysticism beliefs.

>>1408650
The belief that the end of desire necessitates stagnation, boredom, and death is a silly millenialcuck belief conditioned by a globalist society that cannot imagine life without the insatiable yearning for the Other its entire mode of existence is predicated on.

Not to mention the issue isn't about desire being wrong but desiring the wrong things

>>1408400
why would it be, /tv/-poster? you wouldn't be able to comprehend and articulate the concept of "consciousness" or "mistakes", without consciousness.
>but muh suffering, tfw no gf
wanting to undo consciousness because it's challenging is like wanting to cut off your legs when you get a charlie horse.

>>1408413
No comparison between wanting to shut down consciousness and something else works because if you're unconscious/dead you won't miss out on the positives but are spared from the negatives, which isn't the case with having your legs chopped off.

All the Catholic-Protestant conflicts. Charles I of Spain and V of the HRE had to fight against Protestant princes and rebelsm

>>1408474
Do you have the wiki articles or some other links?

>>1408361

>I didn't expect Germany and Spain to be able to talk thorough differences.
Seriously, why not?
And Spain fought in the Coalition Wars with France before Napoleon decided to invade it.

There was a decent chance at a successful capture of the Ruhr area if Britain and France went all in when Germany was invading Poland. Then the front freezes, and we get strategic bombing of Germany, more complicated diplomacy with the Soviets and Italy (who could end up on either side), and Germany is slowly worn down.

But for that to happen, you'd need to get the Allies to gear up for War '39 instead of War '42. Remember, even Germany wasn't gearing up for War '39.

I think a more realistic scenario than the decidedly anti-war and/or reactive rather than proactive allies actively attacking Germany while it was busy in Poland is a much simpler and I think much more plausible successful defense during the Battle of France.

Going through the Ardennes was incredibly risky and at times the Germans had miles long traffic jams on the handful of roads through the area (as in single digits of roads, like half a dozen or something at times).

Should that advance be spotted earlier and more importantly this intelligence acted upon, the war would be over, I think. Germans lose the advantage of surprise, of cutting off the allied vanguard, and suddenly the war turns out the way the allies wanted to, with a slugfest in Belgium.

>>1408336

If we imagine the Front is on the Rhine, what would that imply for the rest of the war?

The strategic bombing is still happening. It didn't start 'by mistake' when a German bomber accidentally dropped it's bombs on East London after missing a military target in order to make it home; it was planned before the war by everyone. And everyone during the war invested in it, especially the WAllies.

>>1408141
>Why is the field of economics bias towards liberalism?
Explain what you mean by liberalism.
Social liberalism?
Economic liberalism?

>>1408141
Idunno OP, why are Science Journals fact-leaning? Hmm

Because it's the establishment m8. You are allowed to say the USSR was an evil state but you're not allowed to criticize the EU.
Ok..you are allowed, but nobody will take your seriously. At least in my country.

Oh and please folks, stop making the anti-EU a left/right thing. Because every country is different. In my country the right wing parties are the ones that favour EU as opposed to the left wing parties which want out.

Google it.
Asshole

Probably right at end of Sengoku period, it's all downhill once Hideyoshi and then Ieyasu took over

So mid 16th century-ish maybe, I don't know

>>1408022
It's not something that can be googled....