>Rome remained a republic and didn't fall
>Anglos won Hastings
>Islamists fail to conquer anything outside of arabia
>Austria is absorbed into the German empire
>Christianity remained the dominate religion in the middle-east
>Mongol empire never exists
>>1442795
>Austria is absorbed into the German empire
If only.
Btw that girl is a real qt
>>1442800
>girl
>>1442795
>I have a qt gf.
What can you tell me about the man who killed Hitler?
>>1442785
You mean his doctor?
>>1442785
What about the man who Hitler killed?
>>1442785
Even though killing is something morally questionable, in this instance - and all others, too, to be honest - he did nothing wrong.
deontological ethics are bullshit
prove me wrong
>>1442637
I wonder what race could be behind this post...
Good general, excellent administrator, will restore the Roman Empire back to greatness
>>1442573
He was the last hope for Rome, but the christcucks took him down because earthly empires are no good.
>>1442573
Who is this man?
>>1443095
Julian the "Apostate" aka last pagan emperor and hope for Rome
I want off the iron age ride.
>>1442302
This is great where can i read on this more OP?
>>1442302
The bronze age were warriors according to Hesiod who did these ageing thingy so fuck off.
When did this so-called "Golden Age" exist?
Who was really responsible, Bismarck or Napoleon III?
Or in other words: From a pacifist viewpoint, who is to blame?
any takers?
>>1442488
this is a slow board. threads can stay up for days. You don't have to bump every 2 hours
>>1442241
I know it's the catalysator of the following world wars, but what was it about?
Has the world seen a leader as larger-than-life as Genghis Khan following his death? I don't think so.
>>1442084
Stalin/Mao/Hitler :^)
>>1442084
Vive l'empereur!
>>1442084
thats because you have literally an entire country full of his offspring
Will antisemitism become mainstream again? Seems like the global sentiment against Israel has begun to rub off heavily on the Jews.
>>1442071
These is an extremely interesting picture that i have not seen before.
>>1442071
Mainstream? I highly doubt it. Though I think that with the boomer era of both whites and Jews dying out, we might be able to approach something more akin to an 'honest perspective' by both sides.
Younger Jews don't seem seem to have the same /pol/-tier autism that chucklefucks like Golda Meir, or the favorite example - Barbara Spectre.
Likewise, seeing as the non-Israeli Jewish diaspora in Europe and the US have made it acceptable to publicly dislike Israel, and since the 'progressive' left has been outsourced to circles outside of predominantly Jewish academic groups, I think we'll see more of a diffusion of concerted interests there as well.
I think there will be banter-filled times ahead, hopefully without shitty reactionary outbursts by either side.
>>1442071
Is Hitler a Freman from Dune?
To what extent do people of a nation "lose" their genetic identity when they are conquered? For example, when the Mongols conquered the majority of Asia, to what extent did they cleanse the people (not via executions, but breeding). I know an individuals lineage extends into the past like a fractal tree, so does it have that much of an impact when there is a degree of miscegenation that occurs? Is it enough to permanently alter the genetic identity of a person, or does it have to be a sustained effort over many generations? Or is the concept of genetic identity a spook or something, and we are all Africans yadda yadda.
I am interested in getting a genetic DNA test, but I'd like to know if it's worth it if interbreeding is negligible.
To different extents, depending on many factors, such as if the conquerors want to mix, if the conquerors merely occupy the elite positions, or if the conquerors actually also bring in mass immigration, and then whether there's integration and so on
Now kill yourself
>>1441980
>Now kill yourself
can we please not do this on this board? can we have one board that is atleast somewhat civilized?
It depends on when and where.
Is the conquered population settled or nomadic? Do they hunt or are they agrarian? How big is their population? How dense is their population? How far away from the conqueror's homeland are they?
Anyone ever heard of this happening in the '80s?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PuQW7yXaZlo
I also make this sort of threads. I think this is or can be really damaging and disturbing to some without mentioning this.(http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/81839154)
>>1441963
Yes. My mother has an image of the virgin of Medjugorje
So unreal that something like this happens
>>1441963
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ob8bHdjiPZA
What kinds of foods did medieval and ancient armies eat? Was it just what they could take from locals? Did they have hardtack and salt pork like 18th century armies?
>>1441866
Aristocracy would have supplies, men at arms would maybe live off the land or trade locally. Roman legions would be well provisioned for all i guess.
>>1441866
But yea dried meat, wheat/grain breads, salt etc would be common i guess
>>1441866
I am also really curious. I suspect the answers will change drastically given regions and times so it's sort of a tricky one to answer.
Why did the US oppose having soviet ICBMs in Cuba after they put american ICBMs in Turkey?
>>1441847
Because having an advantage is preferable to not having one? It was called the Cold War for a reason mate
Why are you defending the USSR if that was fake communism?
There are no real rules governing international relations. States are allowed to be hypocritical. When the stakes are national survival blindly adhering to moral consistency for its own sake is a needless shackle.
>arguing against suicide
Why do all philosophers seem to be compelled to do this? I mean especially the nihilists and existentialists. Why do they attribute special significance to this one act and then come up with ad-hoc arguments that do not logically follow from their ontology?
Because suicide is ending your single chance at doing anything ever for all existence not only early, but intentionally. It's like winning a billion dollars and spending $7.40 and then burning the rest.
>>1441670
First off what nihilist is going to say "wowy life is literally like winning a billion dollars". Ascribing positive value to life doesn't follow from belief in the absurd. And this analogy fails because burning billions of dollars certainly isn't proscribed by Nietzsche or Camus or Sartre.
ig anything, why then should suicide not be seen as an equally meaningless act, the validity of which is just as irrelevant as any other?
>>1441659
It's the spirit of rebellion that's found in Nihilism and Existentialism and finalized by Camus. Raging against the constraints of being by constantly grappling with the want to end it.
Only people who weren't historically literate to begin with think that Vikings were like some Elder Scrolls shit so why does some guy keep making these damn Viking hate threads?
Anybody with a knowledge of northern European history knows they were fantastic traders and explorers who built great ships and made good use of them. They had the North Sea Empire and were valued as craftsmen and metalsmiths and mercenaries. Any complaints of fanboying could be leveled against any other half notable group out there.
>>1441636
>WE WUZ VIKINGS N SHIT
vikangz*
>>1441636
>tfw no successful Scandinavian colonization of America
>tfw no Germanic Europe
Does /his/ like stoicism?
Trying to be stoic in my day to day life has actually helped me a lot.
>>1441611
It's pretty good shit, almost like a proto-nihilism
Stirnerian egoist myself, but I like the Stoics quite a lot. I think they have some excellent ideas that are worth incorporating into your day to day life.
Nah Epicureanism fampai