Archived threads in /his/ - History & Humanities - 3171. page

Because most people are only familiar with a very rushed simplified (and thus prone to mistakes) history.

>>1451236
please elaborate why do you think so he wasn't

>>1451266
He was literally appointed by Hindenburg
Hitler never won an election in his life

>>1451220
>race
>social construct
nice meme

When the Egyptians divided man into Egyptians, Nubians, Libyans, and Semites

They were a highly xenophobic people, isolated by sea and desert

/pol/ pls, I can sympathise with your autism, but it gets annoying after a while.

>>1451203
>Deutsche
True
>Demokratische
Depends on your point of view. They had elections.
>Republik
True

>>1451229
>deutsche
all german culture was purged and replaced with soviet shit
>Demokratische
LMAO
>Republik
even north korea calls themselves a republic

>>1451229
The elections had 99% voting for the ruling party. That seems to be a bit manipulated

File: nevr4get.jpg (84KB, 736x552px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 736x552px

It turns around though

Sounds pretty morbid to me

File: image.jpg (93KB, 500x703px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 500x703px

Kurt contain went insane

Baby don't hurt me

>>1451026
Don't hurt me

>>1451649
No more

>>1450828
Shitty meme tier garbage.

Academically speaking, it's a total shit.

Politically speaking, it's basically the most anti-people history of the United States. It reduces the bulk of the American people to a group of inept pussies who keep getting tricked and intimidated by a tiny minority, against their own best interests. The only change possible, and the only change necessary, is for sufficiently just guardians to appear to guide the weak masses in what to believe and what to do.

It's as much an argument for the people being subject to the house of lords as anything else.

>>1450828
dude fuck le system everything u know is a lie xDDDDDDDD

>>1450842
>It reduces the bulk of the American people to a group of inept pussies who keep getting tricked and intimidated by a tiny minority, against their own best interests
And that is wrong because...?

Kagan

:^)

>childishly insisting on ranking everything ordinally by subjective terms of value
>pinning any two related things against each other to determine 'betterness'

Lrn2histroy

Herodotus:
>"I traveled and inquired about the known world like no one else before me [who has survived through the ages] and try my best to list all the accounts and perspectives of these events to let you, the reader, to decide them, while also occasionally giving you my opinion of what likely happened and why."

Butthurt pro-Persians, Greekaboo Romans, anti-Western skeptics, and modern historians:
>"Herodotus--father of history? No! More like the father of LIES!"

Thuycdides:
>"I'm going to write about one particular regional conflict that I served in Office in for only the first few years of it, so therefor I practically witnessed all of it. Fuck what my sources are or trying to list alternative accounts, that's nonayabusiness, plebs; let me do that for you and trust me. Btw, the main event I wrote my histories on ain't even a single war, but two, but I'll push it as one huge connected one to make it sound more important. Also, all those speeches I wrote are all made up by what I assume those niggas really said. "

Butthurt pro-Persians, Greekaboo Romans, anti-Western skeptics, and modern historians:
>"Truly Thuycdides is the father of history, and champion of non-fiction -- unlike Herodotus!"

[1/2]

File: 1463401259203.jpg (2MB, 1500x2100px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1500x2100px

It's veniality and materialism.

People want to enjoy their self and their things more than they want to be saddled with raising kids.

It's actually pretty common in highly advanced, rich societies like ours.

Infanticide and abortion, due to a lack of prophylactic measures, were huge in Rome's apex

Because back in the day you had a farm or a "business" and you needed as much "free labor" as you could get.

That and child mortality was incredibly high, so having a bunch of kids is a good strategy.

>>inb4 CAPITALISM RUINED EVERYTHING BRO.
>Plz don't give me an answer that might make me feel uncomfortable.

Why would you expect most people to invest loadsamoney and thousands of hours of labor with almost zero hope of recapitalization?

A Struggle for Power by Theodore Draper is a good read on the causes of the American Revolution. Not specifically on early philosophy/ economics per se, but does touch on those aspects as well as others in the overall theme.

>>1450654
thank you

File: 51utAMocM7L.jpg (35KB, 331x500px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 331x500px

>>1450644
This.

>>1450596
WE

>visit China with senpai
>parents die from air pollution
>brother dies from bird flu
>sister gets kidnapped into sex slave trade
>dog strangled for meat
>passport confiscated by people's republic
>identity stolen by upper middle class Shanghai kid because he wants to attend US college

>>1450624
And then you get hit by a truck and your organs are harvested for some PRC official.

>>1450550
>Could it be argued that Judas Iscariot is out of all the apostles the most important one out of all of Christianity.

It could, that doesn't mean that it should.


From a christian perspective, Jesus was/is God.

God didn't/doesn't need anything/anyone to do what he wants. Maximus the Confessor speculated that the Incarnation would have occurred regardless of the fall so as to bring man closer to union with God.

>>1450550
Look into the Gospel of Judas.

>>1450550
jesus knew he was going to be betrayed, it was preordained. the betrayer could have been anyone

>>1450430
Go ask a Luciferian on /x/

>>1450432
I'm asking from an entirely historical perspective pertaining to documents and lore from old. I don't give a shit about the paranormal.

>>1450430
Since there is no original doctrine on "Satan" fully, you could see is as a seperation from God, ignorance to God, self indulgence, and eventually actions that lead to negative results.

In Sanskrit it would be "Adharma" and "Maya" or "Mara", and demonic forces that drive a person to meet their material ends without considering truth or enlightenment but rather gain over the expense of others.

What do you think?

He got convicted of rape by a jury of his peers. Why is this even a question?

Now, anon, that's a different question from how he was wrong.

Why he was wrong probably has something to do with

1. He was the pioneer of a new method.
2. He may not have been perfectly precise in his thinking.
3. His Catholicism lead him to weird places.

Chinese multi-regional hypothesis propaganda.

>>1450141
Explain pls

>>1450149
Chinese push propaganda the the Chinese people evolved separately to other people, denying that humans came from Africa (neanderthal and denisovan admixture too). I can't believe people buy it, especially with the earliest ancestral fossils found outside of Africa is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homo_erectus_georgicus

>The fossils are about 1.8 million years old

>>1450099
They liked to think, and solitude to the best way to get some real writing done.

some people find solace in themselves

>>1450099

Like many philosophers they mistook things they personally enjoyed as being inherently good or desirable and things they personally abhorred as evil.