Redpill me on christian apologetics, namely WLC, C.S. Lewis, and Plantinga
>>1461345
Nobody outside of the US cares.
>craig
Has basically made a career put of the gish gallop. Waste of time to go into any more detail than that.
>Lewis
"If god isnt real then that would make jesus a liar and jesus would never lie. Checkmate reddit."
>Platinga
"How can evolution be real if our eyes arent real" and "Your only choices are believing in god or that you're a brain in a vat"
>>1461345
>“Say what you like,” we shall be told, “the apocalyptic beliefs of the first Christians have been proved to be false. It is clear from the New Testament that they all expected the Second Coming in their own lifetime. And worse still, they had a reason, and one which you will find very embarrassing. Their Master had told them so. He shared, and indeed created, their delusion. He said in so many words, ‘this generation shall not pass till all these things be done.’ And he was wrong. He clearly knew no more about the end of the world than anyone else.”
C.S. Lewis
>No one cites me
WLC
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=emZlovxLZUM
Redpill me on the Samaritans
Are they really "good"?
>>1461341
they're inbred shits
>>1461341
If someone is good put the adjective good before their title.
Good person.
If they are a Samaritan, you can call them a Good Samaritan.
zzzzzzzzzz
>>1461341
there was only one good Samaritan
Hey friends I have a question for all of you guys?
When did this neo reactionary movement start?
What was the cause of the alt right movement?
What is the dark enlightment?
Who is Nick Land?
>>1461303
I wanted to read a book by Nick Land. But is it readable or is it postmodern gibberish?
>>1461307
Well he is vey interesting it is just odd that we are being entrenched with his type of beliefs?
>>1461336
>entrenched with his type of beliefs?
Who says I am? Just like to expand my horizon. Though sometimes that don't end up with good books aye.
Who had the most /fa/ flag?
Favourite story about the design or creation of a flag?
Any related stories etc.
Heraldry > vexillology
Just saying...
http://www.joshparsons.net/flags/ratings.html
>>1461278
We, like Nepal, don't have a flag.
Ours is a Burgee Penant.
Does physicalism entail panpsychism?
>>1461245
No, why would it?
Brains produce consciousness. Brains are physical. Ergo, the physical is conscious
That's a handsome gorilla - I want him to be my bf.
What was this guys fucking problem ? Seriously, no memeing here
Dude stuck to his doctrine to the very end.
Gotta respect that.
>>1461235
If you don't want memes then you shouldn't make a shitty thread
He was not fond of Stalin, but he was a stalinist. Ancoms are stalinist too, by the way.
Is this the greatest philosophical work of this century yet?
>>1461138
Come back by the XXII Century.
Stop shilling your own shit on 4chan.
>>1461138
please give me a quick synopsis of this meme
Seriously, what the fuck was his problem? What kind of sick fuck puts stuff like this in his fun kids adventure story?
Kids back then were not uber feminized pussies.
Henry Darger
>some random early 1900s autist psycho schizophrenic who would belong on /d/ or /r9k/ if he lived today
>artist
>>1461128
>his fun kids adventure story
>undefeated mercenary with only one eye
Jan Zizka was Big Boss.
>>1461114
Boss?
>>1461114
>Weapons with the latest technology and high mobility
Holy shit the war wagons were the original metal gears
Why is JFK considered a liberal martyr?
especially when it comes to today's progressive liberals?
I wouldn't go as far as cruz and call him a republican, but he told hold a lot of values that are considered "conservative" today
>>1461105
They weren't conservative at the time
Conservative must be defined relative to the then political atmosphere. When accounting for this, he was not a conservative at all.
cause he's so hot omfg
Did Japan really lose the war?
>only three cities lost when compared to dozens of british, german and soviet cities blown up
>aside from that the mainland was completely untouched, something that only happened with another WW2 nation, the USA
>no territorial changes - japan started the war by conquering territories, but lost them. so in the end japanese lands are the same as before they went to wars.
>countless USA investments in japan and military protection made it be safe, stable and prosperous, which wasnt as true to european theater countries
Yes yes, unconditional surrender, but in the end Japan was very fortunate with the war.
I say that Japan did not lose the war.
This entire post is retarded
Just because they were spared some of the damage other countries suffered doesn't mean they didn't lose. Many Italian cities were not destroyed either but no one says they did not lose.
>>1460969
What they lost
>An Empire
>A military.
>World Power status.
>Geopolitical Independence.
>Masculinity
/int/craft is now live!
1200 AD - stay within a century of this time period. Roleplay will be enforced.
Version: 1.10
IP: intcraft.online
Armor and swords are capped at iron, combat enchants are limited to level 1 accross the board.
Factions.
No grace.
MEME RECIPES
Cannons plugin.
Nah I'll pass
>A bunch of Jewish characters
oy vey anon just tell it like it is and say /pol/craft
will be here to answer any questions you lads have
How did Austrian School economics come to be, and why is it still so pervasive today, especially among right-wing libertarians?
It evolved from the combination of classical liberalism and anarchism to become the only logical school of thought
Is that the six flags guy?
Hardline libertarians like von Mises and Rothbard were actually secretly communists / Marxists. Marxists genuinely believe that capitalism needs to get as shitty as possible so the working class would revolt and seize the means of production. They actually believe it's their duty to accelerate the shittiness and ruthlesness of capitalism.
This is why both libertarians and communists absolutely HATE social democrats / welfare capitalism, because it prevents them from accomplishing their goal.
So, let me get this straight, even though is called "& humanities" I can't talk about epistemological and methodological varieties on other non-historical disciplines of humanities? I know I complained about feminism, but asking me to go to /pol/? fuck you, mods. Not only is that page literally dedicated to "political incorrectness", and filled with idiots, this page is the one dedicated to HUMANITIES. And that includes politics.
The "& Humanities" was a typo.
This is actually supposed to be just a history board.
>>1460936
>The "& Humanities" was a typo.
Well, this place is still better to discuss evolutionary anthropological theory than /pol/. Just because it's talking about the present, it's still about the past.
>>1460915
posting a habibi won't help you
2/10 you made me reply
Can we just take a second to talk about all of the shit this guy got right.
>The mechanics by which organisms evolve
>Humans evolved from other primates
>Humans started in Africa
>Coral lives on top of dead sponges and it is how the Coral reef was formed
>The importance sexual selection plays in evolution
>Even correctly predicted the existence of an unknown moth species based off of the flowers around the island
Anyone else got examples like this? The only other person I can think of is Einstein with special relativity being proven right over and over even to this day.
>>1460909
>>Humans started in Africa
Isn't this being challenged by new discoveries/theories now?
>>1460928
Yeah but every time there isn't enough to actually prove it was Asia over Africa. So far most evidence suggests Africa.
Oppenheimer, Tesla, Newton.