Who are the best and worst historical couples?
A criminal (let's use a murderer, for example) is entitled to human rights and humane treatment, if all he did was cause harm to a society, and the biggest harm possible to an individual (taking a life)?
Is the current system of imprisonment for the purpose of "punishing" and rehabilitating this criminal to be re-ingressed in society, morally and/or rationally correct?
Is death-sentence for that criminal, morally and/or rationally correct?
How should a criminal (expanding to other types of crime, like drug-dealing, robbery, rape) be treated by society, seeing that imprisonment is basically living life on easy mode (free food, shelter, "safety", all paid by honest civilian's taxes)? Shouldn't that criminal be stripped of his right as a civilian? I'm not advocating shooting all types of criminals on sight like animals, but the current system is flawed in the way that this guy will not be deterred by fear of imprisonment, and much less be rehabilitated in his time in prison.
Pic not related
>>1461897
>Pic not related
Isn't that Raskolnikov about to murder the landlady in Crime and Punishment? Seems pretty related to me.
There are only really two approaches to crime: punishment and rehabilitation. They're both "moral", and the balance between the two a society takes is largely a product of that societies technological and administrative capacity. Ancient societies with minimal state apparatus prefered direct punishments of the "eye for an eye" variety for the most part because they lacked real alternatives, modern states put more of a focus on imprisonment and rehabilitation because it has the economic power to make that practical, but punishment is still a central pillar of most legal systems.
>>1461925
Yet it does naught to change the criminal into a productive member of society, or deter someone from committing a crime. Seems like a flawed and useless system to me.
"an eye for an eye" sounds much more practical, to be honest.
Bear in mind I come from a third world shithole, where an average prison is miles better than the average life of a poor/very poor person.
Pic not related because I just googled some shit (and yes, you're correct in regards to that).
>>1461942
>Yet it does naught to change the criminal into a productive member of society, or deter someone from committing a crime. Seems like a flawed and useless system to me.
Depends how you approach it, Norway for example has extremely low rates of recidivism and one of the most "rehabilitation-focused" legal systems in the world. Meanwhile the USA is almost solely concerned with punishment and has skyhigh rates of re-offending.
>"an eye for an eye" sounds much more practical, to be honest.
It appeals directly to our sense of justice and is definitely the more economical approach, but society benefits much more from rehabilitation in the long run.
>Bear in mind I come from a third world shithole, where an average prison is miles better than the average life of a poor/very poor person.
Economic weakness makes rehabilitation generally ineffective, it's an expensive route to take. The best alternative in such situations could be labor camps, like the pre-Soviet Russian gulag Raskolnikov is sent to. There, criminals can pay back society thru unpaid labor and hopefully learn a usable trade they can rely on when they are released to keep them from going back to crime.
Human rights is just idealism mixed with politics under the name of theology.
If most of them were done, humanity still be around.
>>1461850
Ok, but what difference does it make? does it make any sense in our current circumstances to abolish these rights? Does it make constitutional principles any more flexible knowing they are the laws of men and not God?
>>1461850
First, no. That argument is shit, being that there are female dominant species all over the damn place.
Second, "natural order" arguments are moot when concerning a civilized society. This is not Lord of the Flies, there are rules that need to be decided based on the situation at hand.
>>1461894
This man gets it.
Why do muslims online get so triggered by zoroastrianism?
>>1461829
Medieval Islamic civilization was pretty much based on a Persian foundation. Music, art, architecture, etc. Muslim Arabs don't like admitting this but they can ignore it, it's just neckbeard bragging rights.
What triggers them is the idea that islam was influenced by a heretical religion. Praying 5 times a day? Prayer caps? A ton of jewish traditions imported into islam via christianity? All ultimately rooted in Zoroastrian practices. This stings them to their core.
It's best to think of it as one of many avenues through which the Arab inferiority complex shows itself. I can't imagine non-Arab muslims giving a shit.
t. Bahram Piroozdoost
I vote Zoroastrianism as the official religion of /his/. Not to get Arabs assmad but because it's the biggest relatively recently deceased religion.
>>1461881
>recently deceased
It's still around though.
Was Machiavelli the philosopher of choice for edgy fedoras before Nietzsche came along?
No, because he was satire, as Rousseau so deftly pointed out
>>1461731
lmao
Not really. He was much like Thucydides, in that he was a thinker of realpolitik before it was ever a thing.
Would we be better off if nihilism was never a thing?
Honestly, no, it's an essential step in self-overcoming
>>1461606
It' meaningless to ask...
Nothingism is not a thing.
As Roman Catholic that have been thinking of converting once upon a while, well those thoughts are coming back with the current pope and the way it feels like the church is changing for the sake of non-christians, media and well.. awfully liberal people.
I always been interested in slavic history and what not, not saying I know alot of said history but I like it, so my question to you is; Does orthodox christians hold their faith high? Like the cossacks were ever so fiercely Eastern Orthodox, the Serbs, maybe even the Bulgars? Why? Is it sticking to the roots I may miss in the catholic church? Is Orthodox in this day and age looked upon in a better and stronger light than the other branches of christianity? Is the average orthodox man or woman more connected to their faith in general? Will these thoughts leave my head when we get a new and hopefully more solid pope?
Eastern Orthodox Churches were infiltrated by the NKVD / KGB after the Russian revolution, the current Patriarch of Moscow a fucking ex-KGB agent, much like Putin. So while they might not endorse liberal faggotry like western churches, they're still corrupt as fuck.
>>1461564
Leave you traitor
If one bad pope has your running like a coward to find your safe space then I can't imagine what real adversity will do to you
Best you leave now
>>1461586
Running? Pffsh. Walking pace if anything.
Is it a viable idea, or is it more speculation than fact?
depends what you mean by it. humans evolving separately from apes on different continents? definitely no. but there does seem to be indicators that the different homo erectus populations were exchanging genes with each other more than we knew and thus were still able to interbreed with homo sapiens when they left africa.
>>1461585
So you're more the Assimilation idea then?
Is there anybody who believes this shit who isn't some kind of racial supremacist. I've seen similar theories from whacked out asians trying to claim they are separate from all other humans. I can't think of a reason to buy this unless I have a vested interest in feeling superior to others.
If you are a necessary evil doesn't that sort of make you good?
Only until something better comes along.
And given the nature of a necessary evil, it shouldn't take much for something to be better.
>>1461515
Define a necessary evil in the context of it taking the form of a human being.
>>1461559
Saddam Hussain's regime was brutal and ethnically cleansed his Kurdish citizens, but at the same time it maintained order, it was secular, it kept Iran checked and didn't allow terrorism to fester in Iraq.
Question:
Who is the most legendary figure in all of history?
Define "legendary"
Bumping
Clarko from my btec sport course
>tfw when American
>Implying that there was no genocide and that all the natives died out of disease.
But that's true
>>1461476
Most of them did. In fact most had died of disease before any kind of major colonisation had been attempted.
>>1461476
what shitty state's education system gave you that impression? i was taught they were wiped-out deliberately and even more so from disease. various massacres, evictions, and destruction of their resources were all calculated, cruel, and signed-off on as military operations.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s8VOM8ET1WU
How accurate is this?
>Today's Republican Party opposes big government
Well, it went off the rails with the first sentence. The GOP loves big government, it just wants that big government to be focused on what they perceive to be their defense and financial interests, as well as their moral interests (bans on abortion, gay marriage, et al.)
>muh party-o-lincoln held the purest intentions toward blacks until northern businessmen ruined errything
This is entirely inaccurate.
>no mention of the Southern strategy, or of other major political realignments
This video is fucking bullshit.
only a vapid /pol/ack would buy into this, which is fine because that's the kind of person who's voting for tremp already
That video is fucking bullshit.
>>1461466
Very.
>I recognize that WW2 is a complex historical phenomenon fought on multiple fronts, characterized by various events and by complicated politics/strategies that shouldn't be simplified to fit preconceptions and ideologies
>>1461464
Here's the only reply you're going to get because this isn't bait, OP.
>>1461464
a-and?
>>1461464
I disagree. Nazis are bad guys and the Americans were an army of real world Han Solos who saved the incompetent European countries from evil madman Hitler's grasp and also fucked Japan up but then made it better than it was before and liberated then from their evil emperor.
>The USA played the biggest role in WWII
Felate a gun
>>1461405
in the Pacific?
yes
>i only care to discuss war, death and destruction
REEE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tei3tUY09Pc
>the soviets played the biggest role in world war 2 as i learned from call of duty
Why can't you people realize that a historical phenomenon is not to be simplified to one or two lines? The American financial and material contributions were crucial to the war effort, but so was the participation of millions of soviets who were so mentally raped by combats that they looked forward to playing Russian roulette.
>>1461369
Russian roulette is awesome
>>1461352
>katyn was actually a gay polish suicide pact to make russia look bad