>American children have to pledge their allegiance to a flag every school day.
You could be an edgelord like I was and refuse.
>>1462873
Most kids quietly resent it, it's really just counter-intuitive nowadays.
>>1462879
That's not edgy. I would stand but I wouldn't say it or put my hand over my chest or anything. My allegiance is with humanity, not with nation states or governments.
Has any religion other than Christianity had a major conflict analogous to the European wars of religion? That is to say, a war fought between groups who practice the same religion over the fact that they have different interpretations of that religion?
Obviously it's happening in Islam right now
The great big endian vs little endian war
>>1462871
That is how the Sunni Shi'a split began after the death of the Prophet.
I've been thinking up a form of government and I want to know what /his/ thinks about it.
I don't have to whole thing planned but it is not a majority rules everything type of thing and not a minority rules everything type of thing. Democracy is tyranny by the ignorant majority. Communism makes you a slave to the system the same way Capitalism makes you a slave to wages. The only law of the land would be a kind of constitutional law that would limit the rights of the government instead of the people. Only major population centers like cities and towns that pay taxes to be would be policed and have rule of law. Instead of states that would have their own governments there would be territories with no law instead of in cities and the laws would be made by what the city or town council decides on as long as the laws do not infringe on the constitutional law or whatever you want to call it. Basically if you don't want to pay taxes and be ruled by the law of a city council just live in a town that polices themselves or innawoods. Council members would be voted in democratically but for laws only the council would vote on them. Like let's say there is a problem. Someone will bring it to the council and the council will decide what to do about it. If a council infringes on constitutional law the council will be deemed illegitimate government and the territorial army or militia would remove the council of the city and return the rule to the people but if the citizens agree with what the council wants the city or town would be allowed to leave the country. I am not sure how the council structure would be. It would probably depend on the town or population. There is still allot more that needs to be thought up but these are the basic principles.
What would this be called? If this is already a form of government what is it?
>pic unrelated
>>1462861
That's literally Germany or Italian cities before they got unified under a single state
Well, that's an extreme form of federalism.
You are of course going to run into the problem that most of the local governments will ignore constitutional norms once there is no longer anything forcing them to abide by them.
>>1462885
A revolution would obviously have to occur to establish this system so the old local state governments would be no more. Unless you are talking about the new local governments. In that case the territorial army and citizens (if they believe in the constitutional law) would be there to make sure the council abides by the constitution. The reason there would no longer be state governments is because one state should not be more or less free than another. That doesn't sound like "land of the free" to me.
What are people's opinions on Stoicism? Stoicism is a philosophy which believes that the only things we can control is is our reaction to things and the rest are external(Money,friends,situations,material things) which are outside are control and therefore should be indifferent to.
I think it's a very practical philosophy to dealing with the hardships of life but it's very sad that there's only about 3 major texts about it left, namely Marcus Aurelius' meditations, Epictetus' Discourses and Seneca's letters from a stoic.
its fucking based. helped me through tough times srs
>>1462829
It's also helped me somewhat but I live a really easy 1st world world life so I'm basically a little bitch whenever something comes up,despite my beliefs.
How did you properly internalise stoicism?
>>1462839
epictetus' "there are things within your control and there are things not within your control" was what it all revolved around. i just made a point to keep my head down and do me and forget the rest.
when the shit hit the fan that winter training shit from the discourses made me feel like a fucking boss
>Stop calling God 'muh skydaddy'
I don't understand why you keep saying this. To me, any form of personal god is just as ridiculous as a "sky daddy" so it really makes no difference.
You can, but name-calling isn't a very good tactic, especially since that particular brand of name-calling is closely associated with reddit culture.
If god is what helps cowards sleep at night so be it
>>1462815
tbf to you talking to a girl is just as pointless as talking to a "sky daddy"
How could one philosopher be so based?
>Tolstoy btfo
>materialism btfo
>metaphysics btfo
>Kant and Plato exposed.
>Nietzsche saved and done right.
How have you all not read him yet? What is your malfunction /his/?
>obscure but dank philosopher thread
>not posting based Schelling
>>1462790
I don't know anything about this guy, I like Kant and Tolstoy though. Elaborate?
>>1462808
>Not posting the dank photo of him that looks like a dracula.
How come the Chinese had Taiwan floating in fron of their face for centuries but nobody cared to colonize it, to the point it got snatched by the first Europeans passing by?
>>1462721
>It's logical to snatch every single piece of clay for no reason
You'd make an awful emperor
Have you seen how big China is?
What value does Taiwan add?
>>1462721
idk why didn't england snatch up greenland I mean it's just a swim away.
What if nobody existed but Tongans? Let's say all ancestors of humans emigrated to Tonga, and those who didn't just vanished out of thin air. The only humans in the world to discover fire, invent the wheel and further develop were Tongans. A major constraint would be their limited material availability due to the fact Tonga's tiny as well as the surrounding islands, and thus a lack of population growth. Perhaps there would be adapted technologies like proto vertical farms to support population growth?
When would they start settling on other Polynesian islands? On Melanesian ones, then New Zealand, Asia and the Americas? Proportionally speaking newfound lands would be fucking massive compared to what they know. That'd be goddamn exiting.
Would these migrations somehow cause genetic diversity as settlers may get exposed to different physiological treatment in food, climate etc and may lose connection with home if bureaucratic disorder occurs? Would the world eventually balkanise into many states? What are some realistic scenarios, because there are many possibilities
I once passed a gaul stone in my toilet when I was 15. Had no idea what the fuck was going on and I felt like I pissed out a rock.
>>1462710
/thread
>>1462710
>gaul stone
When did business in North America (USA specifically) start relying so heavily on business/agricultural loans/grants? Is this just a factor of the "lol we'll worry about economy later," or am I completely ignorant?
the food supply is crucial for national security and also the security of the state if the population is armed
Could you give an example of what you're talking about?
Every western country does the same thing. I don't think there's a country in the world that still does pure laissez faire capitalism
Who are the best historians who deal with these subjects? What are the best books to read? I am specifically interested in the European theatre and mostly with the German perspective but I am open to any suggestions of books and/or historians regardless of their focus. I am also interested in partisans for some odd reason.
What should I even be looking for? I've always been interested in WWII and I know a bit about WWI from the internet and documentaries but I've never really delved into literature. Should I be looking for broader works that cover the entire war? I suppose this is dependent on my interests. I guess I am asking what you think a newbie should read.
Cheers.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HBLgZAv_Iqo
What is the concept of a concept?
>>1462533
This is conceptism. Why are you so conceptphobic?
>>1462533
That depends...
>pic related
>>1462533
The set that contains all other concepts
What was the relation between Satyrs and Nymphos in Greek Mythology? From what I read, the appearance of a Satyr is supposed to represent half man and half beast, or a symbol of being subjected to a beastly lifestyle as a man. Satyrs were poets that mainly roamed in the woods and mountains. They are also often depicted with an erect penis which could mean that the man is a slave to his bestial, sexual desires. Nymphos are the same, but yet from what I read it seems that nymphos never actually engaged in sexual activities with the Satyr, but only to tease him and mess with his head.
Is Satyr a symbol of the beta man?
>>1462423
They're both magical beings but beyond that they have no clear relationship. The Satyrs are mostly associated with the god Pan while nymphs are a very broad class of being that includes minor deities (like Calypso) and simple nature spirits (like the Dryads), although iirc both Satyrs and a class of nymphs called Maenads where found among the followers of the god Dionysos, where they both represent the animalistic nature of drunkeness.
https://screwplato.wordpress.com/2010/12/29/are-philosophers-giving-up-on-reason/
Oh my god, from Google I found this blog and I agree with pretty much all of it.
How the fuck can anyone overcome the Munchhausen trilemma in order to find out truths?
Why is it considered "immoral" to daydream about killing scumbags who deserve to pay for making other's lives miserable?
I'm not hurting anyone.
>>1462400
Just invent your own invention if morally right where daydreaming about killing people is fine.
>>1462395
>https://screwplato.wordpress.com/2010/12/29/are-philosophers-giving-up-on-reason/
>Are philosphers Giving up on Reason
>uses literally one source as an argument for his thesis
>screwplato
Fuck me. Kill yourself, OP.
Can we get a Dollfuss thread going? We haven't had a good one in awhile.
>>1462394
>Dictator
>Manlet
>>1462394
>Engelbert Dollfuss
How were ethnic minorities treated in the USSR?
Was there a hierarchy? For example were Ukrainians regarded as superior to Central Asians?
>>1462373
Belaruse and Ukraine had a status of a nation moreso than the other republics. When founding the UN, Belarus, Ukraine and Russia joined as nations, although they were all represented by the USSR. This was a privilege other republics didn't have.
>>1462373
The Soviets alongside Willy are the main reason why the Meme Countries known as Ukraine and Belarus exist
>>1462373
Everyone was treated the same. Had the union lasted for 50 more years, I believe that Armenian, Georgian and Azerbaijani would have been taught in cyrillic.
Thing is, however the USSR was a good thing for asian republics, that didn't have much going on for them.