> be me
> be roach
> can't get guns
> invest and sell my kebab shop to start my project , getting tired of being robbed
> one night I hear my door being bashed with a hammer
> infidelswillburn.jpg
> I have waited so many fucking years for this
> As soon as the door falls the robber armed with just one crowbar is facing against my homemade dardennels gun
> I have wrapped a cheap chinese towel around my head as a makeshift turban
> He doesn't know what to do and I have already lighted the linstock
> I use my full blown turkish autism to yell "Vur Ha!" lighting the hole on the bombard
> As soon it fires I get knocked back against my wall , the actual gun flies off and break my roof
> The robber turned into a pool of blood , the round obliterated him and the muzzle activated every car alarm in a 2 km radius
> The 1000mm solid iron ball destroyed a huge amount of houses along the way and probably hit some shitty chinese skycraper
> I lift my broken body proudly knowing I defend the great sultan
> A kurd stabs me in the back while I was fixing my broken shoulder
> Fucking kurds
>>3251920
Kek. Memes aside, I'm really tired of seeing those "Support Rojava" stickers. Fucking kurds goddamnit.
>>3253309
The Lions contacted me about 3 years ago on Facebook, asking if I'd be willing to come and train them on demolitions usage
>how much are you paying?
>we feed and shelter you, provide equipment as needed
>so, nothing?
>we are a small orginization, this is a volunteer position
>look man, last time I volunteered for anything I got blown up 3 times and had to have a rod placed in my chest, I think I'm good
>it would not be combat postion, only training
>yeah well I helped train Iraqi Army before and look how well that worked out
I guess he got the hint after that because he quit replying
I immediately took down all my pictures of myself in uniform though.
Most fascinating and underrated war.
Discuss it.
What's going on in Vladivostok? Was it a massive front?
>>3251869
Thats where the USA and Britain invaded.
If nothing else I have to hand it to the Soviets for keeping their retarded meme country in one piece for so long
Why did so few French colonists move to Louisiana? What would be different today if more French moved over? Would Louisiana be in the same situation as Quebec or would they have been independent?
>>3251733
Louisiana, or at least the southern part of the state, was very franco oriented up until like the 1930s. My whole grandparents generations first language was French. Their parents and everyone before that never even learned english. And we are only here in the first place because of ethnic cleansing by the eternal anglo from Canada. I guess most of the French colonist didnt really go there because it was the wildest of the wild west at the time, and only people in the southern port of new orleans or french fur trappers way up in like Montana ever ventured there.
>>3251739
Can you explain this image to an anglo? What makes Central Louisiana and Acadiana better than the other three areas? I've heard New Orleans is nice in parts but has been ruined by gang violence
>>3251749
Central Louisiana-This is where Huey Long and the Long dynasty is from
Acadiana-this is the heart of Cajun population and culture in Louisiana. Everything that makes Louisiana Louisiana,food, culture, ect is from here
Baton Rogue-our capital and where LSU is. Its full of shitty fratbros and blacks. This is sort of an inside joke for anyone who lives there.
New Orleans-pretty self explanitory. full of black gangs and crime. Its LITERALLY a grimy, sleazy gross city that has an auroma thats something of a mix between cheap cigar smoke, stale beer, piss, and vomit. While the culture here is also great and a bit different from Acadiana, it is being "Disneyfied" for lack of a better word if that makes sense.
North Louisiana-The people here dont even seem like they are from Lousiana. They have typical anglo names and speak like they are from Mississippi or Arkansas. while cajuns are a distinct sort of redneck, these are just your generic kind of redneck
When is it okay to have enemies, go to war, and enact revenge, if you're a Christian?
>>3251557
all are the chidlren of God. That said, if one were to die, it would be just.
What is "Christianity".
What the pope says? What the bible says? What your parents tell you? What you want to believe? What Christ or God tell you in your dreams?
Most would argue that the Bible is the authority, but it's 2 books which are in essence opposites. Wrathful god and loving god.
You can justify anything with religion. Example: Some say gays are evil because it quite literally says so in the bible, others say the bible teaches us to love so we should also love gays.
In the end people mostly say "you have interpret the Bible and it's metaphors", which means you can make it mean anything you want.
There is no such thing as a "Christian", there's only your specific kind of Christianity.
>>3251594
>this is what protestants actually believe
lmao
In which time period did people first learn how to draw in 3d?
>>3251515
In the west, we tend to think of modern perspective painting as a Renaissance phenomenon. I'm unclear on non-western art.
>>3251515
That isn't 3D, that's just a hexagon with 3 lines pointing to the center
>>3251535
The illusion of 3D is what OP is talking about. Old art looks notoriously flat, so I understand the source of the question.
How different would Mexico be today if he won? Preferably nothing simplistic like "better" or "worse".
>>3251432
If he could establish a sustained regime, it would have fundamental consequences:
-administrative language changed to French, possibly leading to situations like Belgians (Dutch capital Brussels slowly turning Francophone due to French administrators and rulers)
-Possibly no American entry in WWI as the Zimmermann telegram would never be sent to the Mexican government
-possible additional French expansion in Central America
-possible English / other colonial expansion and recolonization of South America (e.g. Chile and the UK)
-increased European migration and investment in Mexico
>>3251457
Most of these sound like good things, particularly increased investment in Mexico.
>>3251457
>Possibly no American entry in WWI as the Zimmermann telegram would never be sent to the Mexican government
Shit just got real
What can you tell me about it?
>>3251428
Based Iran supporting its Armenian kinsmen against the vile T*rks and Azerbaijani serfs. And the Russians supporting both sides.
>>3251428
Russians provided weapons to armenia but recently have been trying to warm relations with both of them go get them into their Eurasian Union project.
>>3251428
NK is autonomous oblast within Azeri SSR, with Armenian population, within a traditionally Armenian region (70% at the beginning of the conflict). They vote to declare independence from Azeri SSR, Azerbaijan responds with ethnic cleansing and so the Armenians revolt. Soviet Union collapses and Azerbaijan and Armenia become independent. NKR continues war with support from Armenian diaspora (material and personnel). Turkey amasses troops on Armenia's border and prepares invasion, tying up most of Armenia's military to border defense and making it impossible for them to support NKR. Russia does not want a NATO state to invade one of its former republics and so sends troops to secure Armenian border, allowing Armenia to send troops to NKR. Fighting ends with liberation of Artsakh (NKR and surrounding Armenian populated lands) and a ceasefire still in effect, with a major violation occuring during the 4 Day War in April 2016, initiated by Azerbaijan most likely to stress test their military, play with new toys, and reduce political unrest at home (AZ is a weak dictatorship propped up by oil money, oil prices decline, etc.).
Armenia entered the war with significant material and economic disadvantages as well as an economy in the gutter (an earthquake in 1988 destroyed Armenia's industrial center). Almost no planes, almost no tanks and a few APCs. Azerbaijan on the other hand had more troops, much more armor and an actual air force, as well as a shitload of oil to prop up their economy.
cont.
I used to love /his/ on the first few days the board opened, I come back much later and now it feels like /pol/ kiddos have ruined any possible high level discourse with personal attacks and unfunny memes.
I'm also seeing some disturbing imagery here. I thought this was a blue board. Why are the mods not actually enforcing the rules they set forward in the OP?
>>3251306
/his/ is where /pol/ meets /leftypol/ sprinkled with /int/ shitposting.
>>3251306
>I'm also seeing some disturbing imagery here. I thought this was a blue board. Why are the mods not actually enforcing the rules they set forward in the OP?
Because they're jaded thirty, or even forty year olds that have stopped giving a fuck about the site a long time ago. There's also like, 12 of them in total.
>>3251306
>I'm also seeing some disturbing imagery here. I thought this was a blue board. Why are the mods not actually enforcing the rules they set forward in the OP?
What do you mean by this
So how was the Culture of Norse and their Lifestyle? Did they have merchants? believe in sacred hospitality or Hospitium if you will. I really don't know beyond them being Viking niggers
>>3251295
I don't think they were much different than pagan germanics rome had to handle.
>>3251295
Of course they had merchants, do you think they sustained themselves by raiding? Trading would have been preferred by most people instead of raiding, why kill trading partners when you can just return the next year and have a steady source of income? They traded with everyone from the Natives of Canada to the Buddhists of the Silk Road.
From reading the few sagas I have, the general impression I'm left with is that generosity and hospitality were pretty big deals.
Norse culture encouraged the art of poetry, and it's because of all of these poems that were remembered across the centuries that we know a lot about Norse mythology (at least in comparison to other European pagan religions).
Hygiene was also something they were really autistic about and it reminds me of what this English scribe wrote: It is reported in the chronicle attributed to John of Wallingford that the Danes, thanks to their habit of combing their hair every day, of bathing every Saturday and regularly changing their clothes, were able to undermine the virtue of married women and even seduce the daughters of nobles to be their mistresses.
le dirty barbarians xddd ammirite?
>>3251416
no evidence of commerce exists
Is religion just a virus of language?
>Once you hear it, you remember it
>Once you think about it, if you're a little convinced then you become kind of scared to not believe it and start feeling you should, because it tells you to
>Once you kind of believe it, you start trying to collect more evidence in your daily life to make you really believe it
>Once you believe it it, you're compelled to tell other people to save them from not hearing it because it tells you to
>Once you believe it, you're compelled to continue trying to engrave it stronger and stronger into your mind under the guise of devotion and prayer because it tells you to
>Once it fully engraves itself into your mind, you deny all evidence that it's irrational because it states that it is a transcendental truth as opposed to a worldly truth, and it tells you to have faith
>Even if you realize that this was all a big mistake on your part, you deny it because it's easier to keep living the lie than admit you've wasted your life believing nonsense, and to give up on your dream of heaven
It all makes sense now...
If youre a retarded atheist and not even agnostic maybe.
Without religion there would be no civilization you understand that?
>>3250967
>Without religion there would be no civilization you understand that?
How does this refute my hypothesis? It's an unrelated topic Some viruses can be accidentally helpful
>>3250967
False. We'd have more existential crises and use of escapism to get away from said crises though.
Approximately 525,000,000 people have died in all wars in history, ~150,000 in total, including small conflicts between individual tribes.
This is over the course of the past 5,000 years of human history, and it works out to an average of 4.5 humans being killed in a war every minute of every day of every year.
Is violence, and war, an innate part of being human?
Will it ever end?
Will we ever reach a time where humans stop warring?
>>3250911
only when there's nothing left to fight over
yes
and then it will end, but it will be nice for a while
>>3250911
>Will we ever reach a time where humans stop warring?
Yes, when we enter an era of post-scarcity and global communism, tovarisch)))))))))))
Was it self defense /his/?a
Is conquest and extermination of barbarians in self-defense justified?
>>3250756
>"barbarians"
yes, it is naive to think they could live in peace forever, even if you had 2 benevolent leaders who hammered out a peace, their successors couldn't be counted on to maintain it
the true heroes of this age were people like Hannibal who decided it is time for a showdown to settle the matter
Maybe it was done because it's just human nature to always want more, more land, gold, slaves, people, cities, etc. Without these conquests, rome wouldn't have lasted as much as it did.
It's just human nature to conquer. And thanks to this we are where we are.
Why does this guy always look so smug?
>>3250554
Because the mods ragebanned him.
You'd be smug too if you were about to ruin europe
>>3250554
Because he "just do it!"
Was the great sphinx originally a jackal?
Ayo you be tellin me woof wuz good boyz?
>>3250407
It could have been a cat too.
>>3250407
nah, it was originally nephren-ka
>Nick Land (my first mistake) convinces me to take Marx seriously
>open this shit
>Chapter 1: Commodities
>A commodity is something that satisfies a human want
>So far, so good
>The kind of want makes no difference
>okay?
>Neither are we concerned with how the wants are satisfied
>...okay?
>Ignore the weird dismissal of value
>move on
>The utility of a thing makes it a use value
>Yes!
>read on
>A simple geometrical illustration will make this clear. In order to calculate and compare the areas of rectilinear figures, we decompose them into triangles. But the area of the triangle itself is expressed by something totally different from its visible figure, namely, by half the product of the base multiplied by the altitude. In the same way the exchange values of commodities must be capable of being expressed in terms of something common to them all, of which thing they represent a greater or less quantity.
>well, that's a weird way to justify abstraction
>But the exchange of commodities is evidently an act characterised by a total abstraction from use value
>evidently
>If then we leave out of consideration the use value of commodities...
> because of triangles, got it
>...they have only one common property left, that of being products of labour
>...or that they're valuable
>there is nothing left but what is common to them all; all are reduced to one and the same sort of labour, human labour in the abstract
>so, labour = real value
>value = "use" value
>...you've got to be fucking kidding me
>TFW Stalin murdered 60 million people because Marx didn't understand value
Should I read on, /his/?
>Skims a chapter of a book
>Thinks he understands it
Am I being b8ed?
>>3250334
>the only way to know for sure that what you read isn't retarded is to read the entire retarded book
Thanks, /his/