Did the increased amount of attempts at genocide increase during the modern age because of technological capacity or the rise of nationalism compared to the past where people were mostly content to pay taxes to their overlords as long as stability was maintained?
>>1578521
>no holodomer
The UN definition of genocide.
>"any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such: killing members of the group; causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part ; imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; [and] forcibly transferring children of the group to another group."
Genocide can have many practical benefits for a state.
Why bother fighting guerrillas when you can simply wipe out the entire population in a region?
If you want to loot people's possessions, but don't want to upset the entire population, why not find a convenient division between minority and the majority and claim that is the reason? If you can do that, why not enslave them as well? Killing off any who consume more than they produce of course.
It will be time to come together and oppose the central banking system and government corruption soon??
>>1578329
This site is run by /pol/ now. Enjoy having Trump being the leader of the free world and kick starting crony capitalism 3.0 in the USA and Russia, and everywhere under their respective spheres of influence. You'll be wishing you lived in China soon.
>>1578344
I don't know what it's like to live in the USA fortunately but living in Korea sounds promising lol
What is /pol/ ?
We would have a church-spaceship for interplanetary prayer-related usage?
Also, a temple to the god Jupiter, on the planet Jupiter?
Or will religion be gone by then? If the fedorites are right.
Religion will never be gone because it is not predicated on reason, evidence or truth, but on feelings. As long as humans feel there will be religion. Humanity will never reach Jupiter because of the rise of colour and money and resources being diverted for dem programs.
>>1578161
>a temple to the god Jupiter
>Or will religion be gone by then
That religion is already gone, and don't be fooled by "neo-pagan" LARPers
>>1578161
politics is the new religion. people these days are more obsessed with "redpilling", "social justice", "fairness" etc. than going to heaven
How did black African people were able to sail to America years before Columbus and become the Olmecs? To me that is one of the most intriguing historical mysteries.
>>1578072
OMG anon cultural appropriation is like, so problematic. Are you saying that natives can't into civilization? Wow. What a fascist. I just can't right now... But wait a minute, what's that? You're saying you're black? Oh well I guess I've better not throw a faux outrage and just stay quiet.
>>1578072
If they built pyramids they could just as well swim across ocean
There was another migration to South America though. One science article that I can't find anymore mentioned this and the book 1491 or 1493.
We all know that the German foreign policy before WW1 was a complete disaster. But is Wilhelm II personally responsible for it? How much power did he actually have?
>>1577144
>But is Wilhelm II personally responsible for it?
Yes.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daily_Telegraph_Affair
>>1577144
he didn't help
He constantly intervened and screwed things up every time he opened his mouth. Example being his infamous 'hun' speech
What are more modern disputes of Locke's personal identity theory? i.e. memory/consciousness.
I've read reid and other contemporaries but no modern authorship.
I've read stuff from continental philosophy but that supposes a completely different ontology
>modern
Do you mean contemporary philosophy of mind or more stuff like Reid or Hume? I'm going to point you towards a contemporary thing that seems relevant.
>...consciousness always accompanies thinking...
Look into Higher Order Thought (HOT) in the philosophy of mind. That kinda deals explicitly with this issue.
>>1576912
realise I didn't even put the most important things I wanted in OP.
I mean peronal identity theory in relation to the self. so the nature of the self over time.
>>1576935
Ah ok. As far as that goes, the only book on it I've read is a comparative philosophy book (author wants to bring Indian philosophers into dialogue with western ones). It's pretty based. Indians loved that shit and the author does a good job of showing how Indian, modern western philosophers, and contemporary analytic philosophers can all benefit from discussion together.
The Self: Naturalism, Consciousness, and the First Person Stance by Jonardan Ganeri
Who can be credited with inventing God? Was it the Persians, the Babylonians, or the Sumerians?
>>1575997
But God created those peoples.
>>1575997
Are you asking who gave birth to organized religion? Because even the religions of all the major early civilizations can be traced back into the Neolithic and probably even Paleolithic times. Religion of some sort or another has probably been around as long as we as humans have been able to contemplate our place in the world and the purpose of our existence. People didn't just all of a sudden decide to start worshipping gods once they settled down and built cities. Just look at Gobekli Tepi, that site proves that temples and places of worship were around long before the first cities.
>>1575997
gods were an attempt to personify natural forces in explanations and philosophies.
Monothiesm came from 'my favorite god is better than your favorite god' getting picked up by authoritarian states to convince themselves they were 'the one good' and everyone who disagrees is 'evil'.
Is Quine's philosophy of language still taken seriously? Why is behaviorism considered dead?
>>1575986
bup
tbqh I am a pleb who has never heard of him, you are better off on /lit/
>>1576506
But then I'll get b& cause not lit related :(
Did Merovingians deserve all the posthumous infamy?
>>1575654
I think it was more about Matrix 2 just being a shit movie overall though
The Morangians are infamous?
>>1575848
Merovingians *
So, can we discuss how addiction was portraited in philosophy, literature and arts?
>>1575501
"no"
>>1575501
A character trait in tragedies.
>>1575501
Check out the beat writers.
How atheism can be scientific if science can't study non-existence?
>>1574845
>non-existence
The lack of belief isn't a physical thing, just like belief isn't a physical thing. You are conflating conceptual objects with physical objects, stop being a raging moron.
It isn't, science is agnostic because we can't objectively prove one way or another
whoa I hate atheism now
Historical figures who were clearly dead inside
>>1574301
I can't tell if he's smiling, angry, sad, relaxed or about to burst.
Shit thread BTW.
Phenomenology
>>1573897
>>1573897
positivism
>>1573931
At least Phenomenologists tend to be trolling most of the time, Positivists actually believe it.
Recommendations of books on medieval history, please.
The Alexiad - Anna Komnene
The Medieval Castle - Philip Warner
Power and Profit: The Merchant in Medieval Europe
Rate my waifu /his/?
I'm 75% done with origins of totalitarianism, it's p gud. Just read eichmann in Jerusalem before that.
>>1572741
How am I supposed to even know who the fuck that is?
She looks like a kikess.