Archived threads in /his/ - History & Humanities - 2884. page

>>1642612
at the same time*, i'm sorry

>>1642612
>I guess all of you guys are aware about the teleportation paradox:

Come on now, who isn't?

lol jay kay anon, jay kay...

>>1642612
If I replace the head of an axe, then replace the handle, is it not still an axe?

History is much better than most humanities subjects. It still for plebs brainlets who can't learn it for themselves.

arent those meme charts suppose to represent earnings rather than importance?

>>1612004
No, it's entirely arbitrary

File: William_Henry_Harrison_daguerreotype_edit.jpg (359KB, 663x792px) Image search: [Google]

359KB, 663x792px

lemme just end the thread right now so we can go back to being /pol/ .5

>Dies within a year of being president

that's pretty much it.

>>1640564
That isn't Harding or Buchanan.

Carter had a profound effect on Liberal International Relations around the world and the US.

Despite not particularly agreeing with Liberal IR theory myself, you can't discount the impact he had at the time. He's still regularly cited in political units at universities across the world.

>>1640106
Race isn't real, but tribalism is. If you don't look like me, then I'm not as naturally inclined to trust you because you aren't from where I'm from.

Is it so hard to believe that different lineages of humans have different mutations the may very well infact affect things like intelligence?

>>1640106
Yes. What people usually mean by race is ethnicity, and it mostly comes up when one ethnicity is intentionally racialized in order to distinguish it from the default, usually White WASP in America.

>>1638631
Every major event in history is just human being autistic about religion/power/money/true/shit.

File: maxresdefault.jpg (57KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 1280x720px

alright let´s meme again

People's Crusade

The Pope had the idea to sent peasants fighting for religion instead of mercenaries fighting for money. In the end their whole army was destroyed by the Turks in the first battle, they lost 30.000 men where the Turks lost less than a hundred.

>>1638160
That's not real communism comrade.

poor decision making by the bureaucracy.

real communism needs to have the people in charge, not stalin/chaves/mao and a few of his buddies who are divorced from the proletariat in distinct ways.

>>1638210
But the people are imbeciles which is why the Maos and the Stalins of the world take always come on top in socialism.

>I want to learn more about the Italian Alps and and Arabic theater and Lawrence of Arabia. I didn't even know this stuff was fought over before now.


They fucking weren't fought over.

WW1 was fought in trenches in germany and france by fucking WHITE PEOPLE.

>>1638126
Hello /v/!

>>1638126
I know you're trolling, but the war between Germany and France (+ some British help) on the Western front was still the most relevant

A shame they chose to replace it with Bedouins in BF1

>>1636794
>Let's have many half-assed theaters!
t. Ministry of the Army.

>>1636794
probably because it was really an alliance between manchuria (army) and japan (navy)
nips gave yanks an excuse to their pacific but god forbid china ever gets the power to collect on its debt owed

>>1636794
I don't really know what their end goal was but I assume it was control oil fields + use chinks as slaves

File: Battle_of_Zama.gif (364KB, 1200x650px) Image search: [Google]

364KB, 1200x650px

>>1635172

HOWEVER

I love this meme. It reminds me of Brexit on /pol/.

>>1635183

We need more memes like these lads, post 'em.

File: 7ad7f900329a447d013b3139c498da56.jpg (119KB, 620x826px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 620x826px

John Paul 2 is a well of hilariously bad statues.

Only if they agreed on a common cause, i.e. remove kebab and merchant.

>>1632711
I don't think too many European ""Aryans"" would be too keen on aligning with the pure Aryans of Iran and northern India.

>>1632707
Why bother?

>>1614813
Autism desu

>>1614813
Long-term stability and neutrality, in comparison to the short-sightedness of politicians who are elected only for short terms and must waste time and effort on winning their next elections (allowing special-interest groups to influence them).

>>1614923
Couldn't you argue the same thing for a dictator/one-party state though too?

File: womann.jpg (45KB, 600x399px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 600x399px

>>1641663

>>1641671
T H I S

File: chick armor.jpg (18KB, 400x266px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 400x266px

>>1641663

File: Basil_of_Caesarea.jpg (246KB, 350x478px) Image search: [Google]

246KB, 350x478px

>>1639767
Not in this passage, no, not a chance.

ctrl+f: ''0p0k'' or ''Keepa''
http://www.peshitta.org/pdf/Mattich16.pdf

We have to look at the context to whom Jesus is speaking. Jesus gave Peter the authority to bind and loose in Matthew 16:

>And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.
Matthew 16:18-19

"Binding and loosing" is a phrase which comes from the rabbis. It refers to the authority to make decisions binding on the people of God.

This authority includes interpreting and applying the Word of God and admitting people to and excommunicating them from the community of faith. For the Jews this meant the community of Israel. For Christians this means the Church.

Saint Basil explains this very well:

>Though Peter be a rock, yet he is not a rock as Christ is. For Christ is the true unmoveable rock of himself, Peter is unmoveable by Christ the rock. For Jesus doth communicate and impart his dignities, not voiding himself of them, but holding them to himself, bestoweth them also upon others. He is the light, and yet 2. You are the light: he is the Priest, and yet he 3. maketh Priests: he is the rock, and he made a rock.
—Basil li. De poenit. cƒ. Matt. v. 14 ; Luke 22:19

File: 351027670_c152df94e2_b.jpg (292KB, 1024x683px) Image search: [Google]

292KB, 1024x683px

>>1639767
>Whoever is not with me is against me, and whoever does not gather with me scatters.
Matthew 12:30

>And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.
Matthew 16:18-19

>The one who hears you (Peter) hears me, and the one who rejects you rejects me, and the one who rejects me rejects Him who sent me.
Luke 10:16

>I have other sheep that are not of this fold. I must bring them also, and they will listen to my voice. So there will be one flock, one shepherd.
John 10:14-16

>When they had finished breakfast, Jesus said to Simon Peter, “Simon, son of John, do you love me more than these?” He said to him, “Yes, Lord; you know that I love you.” He said to him, “Feed my lambs.” He said to him a second time, “Simon, son of John, do you love me?” He said to him, “Yes, Lord; you know that I love you.” He said to him, “Tend my sheep.” He said to him the third time, “Simon, son of John, do you love me?” Peter was grieved because he said to him the third time, “Do you love me?” and he said to him, “Lord, you know everything; you know that I love you.” Jesus said to him, “Feed my sheep.”
John 21:15-17

>>1639907
>>1639912
Ignore these papist heretics

File: Lewd.jpg (629KB, 1000x749px) Image search: [Google]

629KB, 1000x749px

>>1639716
Is removing a cancerous tumor justified?

>>1639716
Only if they were actually capable of anything. It's odd that something as innocuous as (((witchcraft))) was purged if it's generally agreed that it isn't a real thing.

But then again, lets not turn this into /x/

File: The-Witch-Black-Phillip.jpg (201KB, 800x450px) Image search: [Google]

201KB, 800x450px

>>1639716
Yes it was in principle, witches are real and need to be killed. See Leviticus 20:27 and Exodus 22:18 for reference. The problem of things like the Salem witch trials though was that they didn't get a fair trial - which per the Mosaic covenant requires two or three separate witnesses - see Deuteronomy 19:15.

Now I'm not arguing whether the Salem witches were actual witches or not (although some of them probably were), but they weren't really proven guilty the way the Mosaic law commands.