Archived threads in /his/ - History & Humanities - 2856. page

>>1653885
Yes. The government loses another tax payer

Not for weebs

No, and neither is it ''selfish''.
It's more selfish to expect someone to suffer just because you'd be a bit sad if they offed themselves.

Well, her answer was correct. Then she started explaining.

>>1652146
>the Roman Empire was dead for forty years before anyone knew it was gone

Is this real? Spooky

>>1652146
It's idiotic. Early empire and late empire were basically irrecognizable from one another, how can you possibly argue for no change?
Not to mention ignoring the demographic and economic crisis, the constant civil wars, etc.
If anything, the fact that noone noticed the fall until decades after the emperor was deposed shows how irrelevant the barbarians actually were to the situation.

>>1654335
axe, spear, and axespear?

Katana. Only a true enlightened individual can master the art of this sword.

File: download.jpg (8KB, 259x194px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 259x194px

The deadliest weapon in the world, of course

both

>>1651708

I don't know. Life was more interesting when we had a bad guy other than Muslims.

File: C5hLRi0b_G0.jpg (47KB, 603x267px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 603x267px

>>1651714
Ehe islamophobic much?? Its current year and you say all terrorist are muzmuzes go die hitler you!!!

>>1656085
Not really, it's always been around with absolute monarchies.

It's more of a status quo, counterrevolutionary movement.

>>1656085
Don't think i've ever heard of a fascist revolution unless you count Franco as fascist. Fascism is such a loose ideology it's hard to really define it.

>>1656099
>It's more of a status quo
What about the fact that it makes landed gentry/factory workers/owners/peasants equal, they all belong to the same race or group of people rather than separated by class? Isn't that a complete rejection of the status quo?

>>1654616
>that gif

Lol, everyone must've hated Stalin in reality. I like how they put on a show of smiling faces for him.

The people in that gif look Peruvian.

napoleon attacked russia and then there were a bunch of cannons and then the trumpets

File: mfw.png (86KB, 328x281px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 328x281px

>have country
>revolution happens
>everyone who criticizes glorious leader is now an enemy by default
>even those whose criticisms are completely legit
>mfw the country collapses and commies still don't understand why

>>1652821
Because it doesn't work.

File: image.jpg (42KB, 369x413px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 369x413px

>/lit/ Marxists claim the CCCP wasn't a true communist state
>/lit/ Marxists also defend Stalin for taking the necessary steps for preserving the communist state

nobody knows

>>1647127
It would make the headlines for sure.

If we just met them and didn't garner any science or technology very little would change day to day.

We'd probably chase them off once the fetish porn starts getting broadcast towards their homeworld.

4chan would certainly call them spaceniggers that's for sure

one thread wasn't enough?

File: 1449267302614.png (874KB, 680x557px) Image search: [Google]

874KB, 680x557px

>>1646762
>implying you'd rather have man-sacrificing aztecishits ruling you than the great holy spanish empire.

Spanish aren't really whites.

File: nw8Hi6d.png (93KB, 500x422px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 500x422px

>>1631701
Not him again.

>>1631705
Tbh I hate this fucket and John Green but still better than the damn humanities threads

t. not OP

>>1631708
no more armour debate threads.

dumb frogposter

>actually lumping in the alt right with the radical Islamists

Kek. The alt rightists talk a lot of shit and do a lot of woofing but so far they haven't done jack shit but post stupid trump memes and black crime stats

Western right wingers are chicken shit pussies. Not that western leftists can really talk, they've degenerated horribly too

Wether it's ISIS on the right or the YPG/PKK on the left, they at least mean what they say over in the ME

It's a damn shame. Both the far right and far left in the west used to be pretty formidable before the capitalists and neoliberals watered down and ruined everything

>>1652649
>Huguenots
>middle ages

He could have been homosexual, but yeah he surely banged some chicks

>>1652012
That's a homosexual meme

There's little evidence for it

>>1652012
No one was exclusively homosexual. Homosexual as a concept didn't exist until much later on. It was a hobby, then a sin.

File: 1413840839777.gif (4MB, 320x217px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 320x217px

We just had this thread

>>1649485
The defense of her boils down to this:

1) She was the bestest. She healed the sick and no medicine.

2) She was flawed, but who is perfect? So let's celebrate this flawed person, instead of any random person we pick.

They are contradictory, but they will probably be used in paralell.

>>1649498
I looked through the catalog and didn't see any threads. CTRL + F gave results for neither "mother" nor "Teresa". I think I'm justified in making this thread. Or do you expect me to be on here 24/7 in case the thread mentioning her fell off the catalog 6 hours before I posted mine?

>get beaten to the Industrial Revolution by the Anglos
>Anglos establish their first republic 100 years before you do, and when you do finally establish a republic that stays in power, it's been another 150 years after that
>get steamrolled embarrassingly easily in the last major global war
>spend the last 70 years as a broken, humiliated husk, pretending to be relevant

I genuinely can't think of a better example of the perils of hubris than modern French history.

File: 200px-Balt.png (16KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 200x200px

>>1644553
Free Brittany
Free Basqueland
Free Alsace
Free Lorraine
Free Occitania
Free Burgundy
Free Normandy
Free Aquitaine

Am I forgetting anyone?

>>1644567
Scotland, Ireland and wales

>>1644148
Trumps style is pretty unique, in that he says shit that would ruin a politician's career at any time before his nonsense.

>>1644148
Roosevelt wrote the book on US populism.

Or McKinkin. But McKinley was more "use-a-war-for-second-term."

>>1644148
Yes, FDR was very populist, I think, atleast in his era.