Can we get a Christian art thread going?
Post what you got
>>1819978
>>1819978
What happened when someone was caught stealing in Nazi Germany?
Chopped off hand, bismillah.
>>1819931
nothing, since germans were looting niggers themselves lmao
>>1819948
Good goy
How common were revolts in medieval European feudal societies?
>>1819921
Edwardian Era was the peak of humanity tßh
pretty much every time there was food shortages, but rarely any of them was successful due to their military being solely from the higher classes (and a few mercenaries)
>>1819975
Love women's fashion of the time
Great read
http://tintinadventures.tripod.com/id5.html
>>1819910
>Hergé
>neutral
Wew memes
>>1819910
>believing that there is such a thing as "neutral"
no matter how intellectually superior you think you are, you will always take a side on something
The Potemkin village is a proud Russian tradition.
I was listening to the In Our Time podcast (pretty solid btw) on Matteo Ricci when one of the guests mentioned that on several occasions Phillip II was told by advisers that with 50,000 soldiers and an armada they could conquer China. Would he have gotten btfo? I'm talking full on conquering, disposing of the government and ruling all of China directly
His advisors seem to have thought so.
>>1819900
They also thought invading England was a great idea though
>>1819904
My point was that they would know better than the crowd of retarded street children who respond to threads on this board, being acquainted with the Spain of their time and the capabilities of the Spanish military first hand.
Obviously an argument can be made that, yes, it could have been done with an armada and 50,000 soldiers. Obviously an argument can be made that it couldn't have been done with that. Most obviously of all, you're not going to get a decent response from this board, largely because your question is shit. His advisors wouldn't have told him it was possible if it seemed impossible to them, unless they were trying to destroy the empire or something. There's your answer, it's fucking contained in the question you asked.
The outcome of many wars is based partially on luck, the Spanish Armada may very well have conquered England had circumstances been slightly different.
Why were they hoarding all the grain? Why wouldn't they share it with the other peasants?
>>1819863
>kulaks
>capable of caring about the community
STALIN INTERNET DEFENSE FORCE PLZ GO NOW K THX BYE
>>1819960
Stalin did nothing wrong. He just used the system. Blame Lenin for setting it up.
>taxation isn't theft
>property isn't theft
>roads and other public utilities are provided for free and paid for by nobody
>>1819802
it's protection money
armies aren't gonna equip themselves (well they can but that causes class systems to form).
I'm taking an Anglo-Saxon culture course at college, I need me a booklet or something that sums up the history of Britain, i'll read it through this weekend, HELP *HIS/
All you'll ever need to know about Anglos
>>1819586
kek
with all seriousness man I need some good stuff so I could pass this shitty course
bump for the love of bad teeth and cheap alcohol
The majority of Americans posting in this board, support the removal of Theodore Roosevelt. He was scum and they are progressives.
I know this is bait but Teddy actually was an asshole.
Woodrow was more racist though
>>1819558
> they are progressives.
So was Teddy
ITT: people who did a lot of shit wrong, but are still sympathetic
I'll start with an easy one
Yo bruv
>>1819563
osama is kind of like what a modern paladin would look like
the pure white, combined with the militant camo isn't much different to shining plate armour with pure what tabards
>found country on secession from Britain
>forbid states to secede
DEVILISH
E
V
I
L
I
S
H
ethically since they went into the union voluntarily they probably should've succeeded voluntarily
practically America didn't want to Balkanize into a bunch of random states that would be eventually taken over by the Brits or other Euro powers
subtextually states were succeeding to keep their slaves anyway so the "muh freedoms" argument didn't have much weight at that point
It was a representative union. If they wanted to secede they should have done so with majority approval. The south didn't do this and then, acting like the petulant child it always has, they seceded illegally on the basis that they were allowed to own human beings.
>horned helmets would be impractical bro ;)
I love when some tard with no actual knowledge about history tries to be an expert.
>>1819516
Where do you think a blow to your head would go?
Would it be diverted and skid off like with a rounded helmet?
No those horns are going to funnel those blows to the top of your stupid little head:)
>>1819520
Yet people wore them. Keep theorycrafting kiddo.
>>1819520
What if it was a cone with many spikes?
Surely a standard dome helmet isn't as effective as it could be.
What was his fucking problem?
>>1819251
The lugenpresse, jewish owned banking and external forces from other countries in europe after WW1 keeping his people and his nation down.
Don't forget those silly jewish rascals declaring war on hitler in 1933
He tried to fix it, they didn't like it. So they declared war on him. Then things went ugly.
>>1819270
>Don't forget those silly jewish rascals declaring war on hitler in 1933
>He tried to fix it, they didn't like it. So they declared war on him. Then things went ugly.
What? How can a race of people declare war on someone like that?
>>1819251
pic related
What's wrong with being unethical?
>>1819094
Nothing is wrong with it. It's just not ethical.
>>1819094
Who did you kill anon?
>>1819094
Nothing per say except people will hardly anticipate what they can gain from your acts if unethical is your behavior. That's the reason it's 'frowned' upon, as opposed to a good boy anyone can see coming from miles
What did he mean by this?
>>1819071
Radical freedom
Freedom of speech has no effect
Africans think in very literal, non abstract terms.