If he was such a renowned battlemaster and strategist of his time, why didn't his own citystate of Wu win over the Warring States instead of Chi?
Pic related.
>>1852653
Typo there, I meant to say Ch'in, not Chi.
Mush like Mickey Mouse, he isn't famous for being good, just being first.
I hope, this is the right board, doesen't really fit anywhere else. A friend told me about a so-called "false flag" attack, where american soldiers pretendet to be terrorists. The whole thing failed and they got captured. I don't know where or when it happened. Is this story true or was my friend talking bullshit? If its true, can I have a source?
nevermind, i think i found it
http://www.theinsider.org/news/article.asp?id=1556
thread can be closed
I mean, the CIA alone did tons of this shit, particularly in Latin America, and other American organizations have also partaken, so it's probably true.
For example,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirty_War#False_flag_actions_by_SIDE_agents
Can you be a bit more specific about the circumstances though?
>>1852588
The Whole Truth About USA is here in this video you gonna be speechless
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uQCvWWc4Vv4
video is true to be honest.
But doesn't the leader of ISIS have a doctorate in Quranic studies?
>>1852504
>Isis isn't Islam.
Yeah.. right.
Why do Protestants disregard the Old Testament? Jesus never said the books were no longer to be followed, in fact he says the opposite. He was a practicing Jew, so at what point did so many Christians abandon the old books?
>>1852496
Do you guys ever think about how much we generalize people's faiths and even just about anything?
Like, Protestants read the Old Testament
It's not like you find in Luther's writings about Christianity "throw away the Old Testament muahaha" like ?
Many denominations, most of them do follow the Old Testament, even Gnostic ones.
>>1852496
>Protestantism
>As in hidebound, kill-the-gays, god-created-the-world-in-6-days Protestantism
>NOT into the OT>
>>1852496
Jesus literally does say that certain laws were made during a different time with different circumstances in mind. He was speaking about the ability to divorce in Exodus suiting them because they had to keep their numbers up, but the same logic applies to other laws that have outlived their purpose.
How many of you christians actually follow the bible front to back. Not just slacked and call yourself christian.
The Holy Bible is a compendium of texts, written over thousands of years by different authors, different culture and circumstances etc.
Translation also further confuse the issue.
They document God's revelations to mankind, and its authors claim divine authority.
Point being, no one can follow the entire Bible from beginning to end.
It is self-contradictory in many places.
Being a Christian is accepting and believing in Jesus Christ
That he was God's son and died for Mankind's sins.
The rest is just tradition, much of it pagan in origin
Which is fine, it's part of the whole package
>>1852413
i started to, as a good christian should, but when i got to the gospels i realized how heretical it was for a man to call himself god and liken himself to adonai so i dropped that goyim crazy shit
>>1852438
>Point being, no one can follow the entire Bible from beginning to end.
It is self-contradictory in many places.
Aka I have never read the Bible and only making up excuses with fancy words to make up for my excuse for not reading it.
>tfw only a tiny microscopic minority of all 100 billion humans that ever lived knew what it was like to wield absolute power
it's not fair
i cant deal with being an anonymous nobody anymore
what do I have to do to be reborn as a king or dictator in the next life?
>>1852409
Just go to syria and form your own kingdom
it's actually pretty terrible unless you truly have an ideal personality for it
it's not a fucking party, read about the sword of damocles
>>1852409
in one sense you would either have to be a bit crazy and/or have no fear of death
I'm not talking about ancient ancient Hebrew like the old testament but Hebrew that would have been spoken in Jesus' time.
I hear modern Hebrew pronounciation and syntax is rather European.
>>1852315
1st century Judea saw Hebrew as a secondary language, while it wasn't a completely liturgical language, most of its use would have been liturgical.
I'm guessing here, but pronunciation probably would have been very much affected by whatever contemporary norms in pronunciation of Aramaic were around at the time, as it was a far more common vernacular language.
>>1852319
Why didn't Israel just use Aramaic given that it's an actual surviving language?
>>1852369
None of them spoke it anymore.
Why was he crucified? And more importantly, who's responsible?
He pissed off the Jews, and the Jews.
>>1852183
Because the Jewish religious elites
God is responsible because it ended up being a good thing
Jesus was crucified for less than a day before they took him down. How so? It usually takes 2-3 days before it kills you.
Was Romanticism the death blow to Western Civilization?
>>1852060
Sure. That or whatever other -ism you feel like is just not your cup of tea.
no, jews were
>>1852060
I wish I would get a dollar everytime western civilization died.
Semitic Languages : Arabic, Aramaic & Hebrew are the purest.
>>1851966
Why did English become the first language? Anon is right. Fuck germanic languages!
>>1851966
Yeah, pure shit.
Except hebrew is pretty cool.
Indo-Europeans are without a doubt, the most important people on the planet ever.
I have a hard time finding sources on how was life for city-dwelling population of medieval asia (any of the following: china, japan, korea, taiwan, indonesia).
What does /hist/ know about this? or what sources would you recommend?
will my thread get more replies if I do some /pol/ posting or say that korean jesus wants this thread?
>>1851806
I'm curious too
just open up articles and start reading.
"In the winter of 1556, an earthquake catastrophe occurred in the Shaanxi and Shanxi Provinces. In our Hua County, various misfortunes took place. Mountains and rivers changed places and roads were destroyed. In some places, the ground suddenly rose up and formed new hills, or it sank abruptly and became new valleys. In other areas, a stream burst out in an instant, or the ground broke and new gullies appeared. Huts, official houses, temples and city walls collapsed all of a sudden."
"The cost of damage done by the earthquake is almost impossible to measure in modern terms. The death toll, however, has been traditionally given as 820,000 to 830,000.[1] The accompanying property damage would have been incalculable – an entire region of inner China had been destroyed and an estimated 60% of the region’s population died."
"Millions of people at the time lived in artificial loess caves on high cliffs in the area of the Loess Plateau. Loess is the name for the silty soil that windstorms have deposited on the plateau over the ages. The soft loess clay had formed over thousands of years due to wind blowing silt into the area from the Gobi Desert. Loess is a highly erosion-prone soil that is susceptible to the forces of wind and water. The Loess Plateau and its dusty soil cover almost all of Shanxi, Shaanxi, and Gansu provinces and parts of others. Much of the population lived in dwellings called yaodongs in these cliffs. This was the major contributing factor to the huge death toll. The earthquake caused landslides, which destroyed the caves."
it probably sucked ass most of the time for most people
How did the barbarous Teutons become so successful?
Raiding enemy cities gives us a tech bonus.
>>1851665
by stealing civilized women and raping them
monkey see, monkey do.
What are some famous stealth missions in history?
>>1851512
They were stealth for a reason.
>>1851543
Didn't Justinian II sneak his way back into Constantinople?
>>1851512
Operation Snake Eater.
So what's the deal with Juan Peron?
He was a fascist sympathizer and was very critical of the Nuremberg trials, but some of his views seem rather socialist and pro-labour
fascism transcends economic fundamentalism and can be capitalist or socialist or a mix of both. the economy isn't really considered important beyond it's local and pragmatic importance.
>>1851478
his base was the working class, that´s why he adopted socialist policies (while actually prosecuting communist and anarchist labor union organizers)
>>1851478
You do know the Nazi party was rather pro-labour, don't you? Not quite as socialist as Russia, the government didn't strictly take over the means of production entirely, but were more than critical of unregulated free market and banking institutions. It's the idea that an economic policy must adhere to a certain social policy that you need to adjust.
Tell me about the Jewish soldiers in WW1, /his/.
>>1851394
they served their country
>>1851399
Israel didn't exist yet.
Well, they fought for Imperial Germany and some got some medals for it.
Or course it was funny when later on Hitler started deporting/persecuting jews and he had to be like "Well, these jews who have been awarded the iron cross you see they are actually traitors to this country"