Let's have a hypothetical situation where the Zulu warriors commanded by the great King Shaka fight any Native American tribe.
Who wins?
If it were mayans or mexicans zulus would be BTFO
The Zulu warriors were brutal as they were capable of defeating European settlers with guns while the Zulu fought with only spears.
>>1867603
are horses involved?
is disease a factor?
Is purposely shopping at a locally owned business instead of a corporately owned chain leftist or rightist?
>>1867541
Its centrist
viewing the world in terms of left or right is very detrimental way of thinking.
>>1867553
Authoritarian or libertarian?
>>1867536
Spoopy
>>1867536
He doesn't derserve the credit.
He did the easier route while another dog did a much harder route with very shitty conditions but yet he doesn't get recognized and I even think in an animated film he was turned into a villain.
Everyone knows about Athens and Sparta, but what about the other Greek city-state?
I feel like they needs more love.
Thebes had an army of faggots
>>1867533
There's a reason they were forgotten, OP
Thebes was cool as shit for a second. Look up Epimonondas and Theban hegemony. They took their army of faggots and beat the Spartans so bad with it at Leuctra that Sparta never really recovered
Italians can't figh-
>post a spaniard
gg
>Ended up losing Rome
>Fled to Spain to br a mercenary
>Died in battle
>Italians can fight
Could anything have been done to save the Crusader states?
Crusading
>>1867366
They would have had to integrate themselves with the native population. Actually tried to learn their culture and practices, so that they'd be willing to actually support the crusader states instead of immediately welcoming the liberating Muslim armies every time they came around. Maybe elevating more of the native Christians into the nobility, too.
>>1867382
Sounds troublesome
Easier to genocide the locals and ship French pilgrims in to replace them.
>this is a 10/10 in Russia
>>1867334
Bro, his cock was literally like two feet long..
>implying you would'nt let that sexy beast cuck you and impregnate your wife with his superior seed
Atheism is a gateway philosophy of the worst kind. It's bad, a clusterfuck of analytic autism that is never well thought out to any aspect, but which attempts to compensate for its weaknesses by adding in excessive positivism and DARKNESS. The normal anon can see this as the shit it is, and may agree with it, hate it or be indifferent to it, but all the while recognizing that the philosophy itself, regardless of their opinion, is plain bad.
However, these very aspects that try to smear over the shit of its core make it a breeding ground for aspie, unsociable underageb& faggots who engage in every kind of faggotry both online and in the real world. The Youtubers all trying their hardest to look cool, the sci-fi, fantasy, the whole katana faggotry and everything about the Atheist community fuels their escapist fantasies, while the "common sense"-tier dialectics, emphasis on positivism, and overall contrarianism of the doctrine make it fit just right with the drives of your average preteen and his sense of unwarranted self-importance towards the world. Exactly the kind of shit that makes little kiddies and underageb& retards eat this shit right the fuck up.
Atheism is basically THE theological position to attract the most hated pseuds known to /his/, which is why, regardless of individual opinions, it is the responsibility of every anon to troll the fuck out of it and everyone who agrees with it, and ensure that no atheist threads ever encourage the newfriends to show their faces here.
I've been shitting on materialism and edgy atheists for months and months on this board. It un-fucking-believable what fedoras take for axioms while calling anything that flies over their heads woo woo.
I agree 110% anon
>>1867313
Atheism is literally Autism: The Religion
>>1867313
I wonder how many /his/torians recognize the original version of this pasta
Claim your historic waifu
>you will never marry Fionnghal and move to a small croft in the hebrides planning a new Jacobite uprising ;_;
>tfw no reverse trap hussar жeнa
>You will never be the wingman to the White Lily, watching her six as she slaughters fascist invaders while flying over the motherland
Alright, /hist/. If you could go back in time to Constantinople in 797 with 100 men with automatic rifles (and 5 years supply of ammunition, vaccinations and medicine so your men don't drop like flies), 4 tanks 10 jeeps and 1 battleship, how wrecked would the Muslims be?
More rekt than the natives when they fought Spain for the first time.
id rather help the turks desu
byzzieboos should be gassed
>implying the byzantines wouldn't double-cross you and seize your weapons
>implying some byzantine noble wouldn't sell those guns to the Turks to get the upper hand when he stakes a claim on the throne
I love the Byzantines but they're shits.
Would the world be a better place if the Western Allies had never declared war on the Germany and its European allies?
>>1867220
No.
They should have sought a treaty with the Germans to cease hostilities of other European nations in order to depose of Stalin, since Hitler apparently had such a respect for the British Empire.
No idea what the Japanese would've done then since they were gearing up to take on Russia as well. Histories interesting like that.
Could the English have held them off with their fancy bows and long pikes and such?
>>1867218
How would they make it ashore if the english still have their fuck-huge long range cannons? You have to alter the winning advantage if you want to change the outcome of history fucking retard
>>1867522
I thought the winking advantage was the storm and fire boats -- we're the Spanish really that bad at 4D chess to set themselves up for an inevitable defeat?
We know from D Day and the various landings in the Pacific that the Allied commanders considered a freshly-landed unit to be at only one third combat effective. Why? They were seasick as hell.
*If* the Trayned Bands of London attacked immediately against a tercio of seasick and malnourished Spaniards, they might have pulled off an upset. Maybe. That's merely my own opinion.
Does anyone know anything about Pre-Pe-Colonial North American Society?
I heard that before the rise of the tribes the Colonials met, there were bigger societies of Natives in the United States.
Is there any truth to that, and, if so, who were they; what were they like, and what happened to them?
North America as in Anglo-America? Because there were definitely huge native societies in Mexico and Central America. There's only evidence of one native civilization in the modern US and Canada, though.
>>1867206
Yes, in the United States.
I don't mean the Aztec or Maya or whatever.
>>1867200
North of mexico there are the mound builders, but not much is known about them
Were Carthaginians white?
Define white.
Do you think the Lebanese are white? If yes, then Carthaginians were white. If no, then they weren't.
The were Caucasian, but not very pale. Probably looked like you average modern Tunisian.
Tell me about medieval fashion.
no buttons on clothing
>>1867194
OP, it was..
A E S T H E T I C
it was surprisingly shit despite how cool the armor looked
early middle ages was best though.