How come soviets won? Their only tactic was a zerg rush and most of them didn't even have rifles!
>>1902313
What bout their "die move?"
>>1902313
>>1902313
Because of sheer numbers and the size of Russia. It also didn't help that Hitler was a complete retard when it comes to tactics and strategies.
World War Images thread
Any historical photographs, artwork, or propaganda relating to either of the World Wars
>>1889941
>>1889943
>>1889947
Go
So what do you think of John Green and his Crash Course history videos?
I wouldn't take history lessons from a man who eats cereals who had other men cumming on them.
>>1903341
Explain this pls
>>1903323
We have this thread every day fuck off
Why did crusaders completely chimp out every time they entered Byzantine lands?
>>1901495
They chimp out the moment they started.
Catholic crusaders weren't really bros with orthodox. They genocided eachother frequently.
Europian politics at the time only consisted of genocide for financial reasons. Doing it for religion was considered slightly assholey, so they had no reason to protect eachother.
>>1901517
>genocide for religion was considered slightly assholey
>pre-1700s Europe
Give me what you're smoking
What the fuck happened with scythians, sarmatians, tocharians and other aryan people of central asia?
>>1900167
Mongol'd
>>1900170
Mongols didn't arrive until 1200
>>1900167
Slavity Slav
What war do you find the most interesting /his/?
>>1904950
WW2 pacific theater.
>>1904950
100 Years War
>>1904950
To be frank none of them.
What are some historical examples of cultures with 'third genders" or anything comparable to the modern transgender phenomenon? Just curious.
The Hijras of South Asia (India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh)
They still exist as a third gender today and Pakistan even legally recognizes 3 genders on its passports, ID cards, documentation, etc.
>heh Thai lady bois always existed heh can't you see gender was always a social construct and everyone was gender fluid before 1950s america
None. Gender is a social construct.
Who was greater, Nietzsche or Stirner?
Nietzsche. His philosophy covered a great deal more ground than Stirner's. I'd say Stirner's was more solid, but vastly more limited.
>>1904007
Nietzsche attacked the superficial. Stirner attacked the fundamental.
>>1904007
neechee derived "ought"s out of simple "is"s. this is what gives you the illusion that his work "covers more ground", when in reality it covers only imaginary ground past what stirner covers.
stirner was infinitely more based because nothing he said was wrong or baseless, unlike the neechers.
>"become what u are lol!!"
spooked as hell. you already are what you are.
give me one solid argument for absolute monarchy, please.
god wills it
It's OK as long as there's no inbreeding bullshit
Transitions of power tend to be pretty shitty.
ITT: Presidents that were the most based
This is a good thread
Tell me more about Carter, please. Literally all I learnt in high school history was the whole embassy hostage issue.
>>1898405
He has done tons of work with Habitat for Humanity since the '80s. He runs an annual homebuilding drive where they build homes for people all over the world.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_%26_Rosalynn_Carter_Work_Project
He also won a Nobel Peace Prize, started the Dept. of Energy and the Dept. of Education, and he beat the shit out of cancer at age 90.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_Carter
ITT: Historical villains who literally did nothing wrong.
>>1895561
benny was a dumbass
not really a "villain" but he definitely fucked up by changing sides
>>1895591
guy gets shafted after all of his achievements and decides "well I'll just go to the other side"
at least he is remembered, unlike Horatio Gates
>>1895573
Mr. T?
Philosophical reasons not to kill yourself:
1. ???
>>1888351
For me, it's a personal "fuck you" to God.
>>1888351
For me, the only reason I keep living is that I am already alive and it would be pathetic to finish it. Just keeping the status-quo in a way.
But lets say if the plane I am on board starts trembling and heads for a crash, I would remain calm and take it easily.
>>1888351
Donald J. Trump and the possibility of history getting interesting again.
What's prevented the further use of nuclear weapons in modern warfare?
>>1900633
> not using MAD
Can't believe (((whites))) are co cucked that they fear their own weapon.
>>1900633
They are very very very very very very deadly no matter how they are fired/dropped/detonated, and the impact of one will cause the launch of another and the launch of another until down the line you have something less akin to a war and more akin to the greatest genocide mankind has ever committed against itself.
It isn't something to be taken lightly in any kind of warfare, now that even North Korea is nuclear hot.
>>1900640
Dumb fucker poster
Britain or Germany
in all fields (science, humanities etc.)
>>1894213
Germany isn't even a real country
It's pretty much a tie, but anglo hate is the new meme, so everyone will say Germany.
the jews