Archived threads in /his/ - History & Humanities - 249. page

if I pulled off those beards would they die?

>>3281099
Stop

The Germans of the Semites I would say

>>3280982
Couldn't some of Greek philosophies and theoretized inventions be considered science fiction? Hypotheses, like the atom, or the steam engine, which later on turned out to be true and achievable?

>>3280982

well, Herodotus did made a lot of things up or embellished sailors tales and superstitions, I have no idea if his contemporaries took everything at heart or chuckled to some of his notions

>>3280982
The idea that the future would be radically new was a Zoroastrian/Judaic development.

File: VQUN1tsjcoy_400.jpg (37KB, 400x386px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 400x386px

Why are Christians so anti-semitic?

File: _92274782_jordanpeterson-still.jpg (50KB, 1024x576px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 1024x576px

>he thinks Christianity is about the bible and not creating a universal morale
begone philistine

>>3280827
Because the jews are the enemy of humanity?
At least thousands of old scriptures, legends and documents say so. Has to be something to it.

>>3280772
Certainly to a big extend. I don't think k that that's something negative because if anything it ultimately lead him to succeed.

>>3280772
About 60-65%

>>3280772
He wanted to LARP as Rakhmetov from 'What is to be done?'. Arguably influenced his revolutionary streak far more than any he read by Marx.

File: Harlem_Hell_Fighters.jpg (252KB, 1048x758px) Image search: [Google]

252KB, 1048x758px

>>3280747
The US had some:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/369th_Infantry_Regiment_(United_States)

File: IMG_1969.jpg (33KB, 387x268px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 387x268px

>>3280747
Actually a decent few. Germany did not bring any to Europe iirc but did have a decent African division under Paul Von Lettow Vorbeck who held out in Tanzania until the very end of the war. Britian also used African soldiers in its African theatre.
France took a decent number of African soldiers to Europe and even Italy and American had quite a few black soldiers. So definitely a fair few.

>>3280747
The British used poo in loos on the Western front. Chapter in Storm of Steel about it

>>3280691
Both.

Pleasant and impractical.

>>3280691
Pretty sure if people could live like that, they would. Don't know about you, but in my country anything bigger than a one bedroom apartment sells for over half a million. I foresee logistical problems.

File: 1451988538681.jpg (9KB, 255x247px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 255x247px

>>3280694
Half a million's barely anything though.

>>3280502
I think so too. France and Britain's publics were too war-weary from WW1 to support an offensive war against Germany. The USSR might have tried something eventually, but it would have had to occupy Poland to get to Germany, which would have pissed off Britain and France and possibly caused them to support Germany against the Soviets. Also, I think that Soviet armies would have been pretty ineffective in a war of conquest. The real timeline German invasion forced the Soviets to get good quick or die and filled their soldiers with zeal to defend their nation. This would have not been the case in an offensive campaign.
Hitler was truly a fool.

>>3280502
I think their economy was running on empty and they were threatened by another bout of debilitating hyper-inflation and just had to go to war sooner or later.

>>3280541
Considering the wirtschaftswunder pulled off by Ludwig Erhard, an economic recovery without war was certainly possible. I assume Hitler was going to war more for ideological reasons a la lebensraum.

Excellent question, bumping for an answer.

>>3280330
Kind of like how the church functioned under nobles in Europe I'd guess. Everyone was subordinate to the ruler, but aristocrats had certain privileges and exemptions that bureaucrats had to work under or around.

You could advance to nobility and nobles were the ones in charge of the lands and supervising the bureaucrats which allowed them to pocket money to themselves.

File: Propaganda.jpg (126KB, 530x446px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 530x446px

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWM4bJNpch0

>>3280240
Prophet of our times, who unfortunately was right

>>3280240
CIA propagandist shill.

It was self-defense against the coalition, it was everyone else that declared war on France.

>>3280178
SPBP

The Eternal Anglo and the Coalition wanted to put a Bourbon puppet on the French Throne. They were also deathly afraid of the French Revolution. They didn't want it spreading through out Europe. Putting the divine right of kings and the peerage in danger.

Autistic Anglos attempting to put France in the dirt.

>>3280142
>Pashtuns
>Aesthetic

Wut

File: attachment.jpg (25KB, 330x480px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 330x480px

>>3280164
Retard
Nuristanis are pretty awesome too, all Afghans in general just look really cool for some reason

>>3280142
Iran is all right.

>>3280130
>when just 13 years earlier it was the 50s and even mentioning sex was unacceptable
Don't make me post my 1950s porn folder.

File: ??.png (51KB, 185x181px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 185x181px

>>3280130

((()))

>>3280059
what do you mean they turned on "free french forces"? the resistance?
the resistance was against Vichy and the German military so I don't see how Vichy "turned" on them. or did you mean why did the third republic surrender so soon and why France hated anglos specifically during ww2?

>>3280059
>They had nothing to lose if they surrendered to them willingly.

Which is why they didnt oppose the liberation of France by allies in 1944

>>3280059
>go full quisling
>then bitch when brits start treating you like the traitor you're and try to make sure that you won't give your fleet to krauts

The climate was more conducive to big plantations that needed a lot of niggers to work on them

>>3280043
more economical to use slavery for harvesting cash crops such as cotton whereas northern farms, i think, tended to be smaller and less labor intensive. there was almost always a shortage of white laborers in early america, too, so i reckon having bonded slaves whose movement you control and whose kids become your property makes it a very advantageous system to have.

furthermore, it's important to add that slavery in early america was thought to be in terminal decline by most observers. Virginia had been the main slave economy in the 1780s and 90s, but around that time it was going into economic stagnation and decline. Once upon a time, tobacco had yielded high profits as a cash crop, but soil exhaustion and, i think, dropping tobacco prices (from competition abroad?) made the huge tobacco estates unprofitable. In this new situation, Virginia planters found having large slave labor forces to take care of was becoming an increasing burden than a benefit. I remember reading a quote by George Washington saying something to the effect that slavery wasn't even economically profitable anymore. All of this changed with the importation of the new improved strains of short staple cotton into the US and (though this is in contention nowadays) the cotton gin made on top of accelerating industrialization in Britain (which was heavily reliant on the processing of cotton into cheap mass produced textiles using steam powered machine factories) which saw a huge surge in the price of the cotton and the increasing demand for slave labor. As a result, you see a huge internal slave trade popping up (as the slave trade got banned in 1805) trafficking slaves from the stagnant plantations in Virgnia to the richer cotton-friendly soils in the west, especially in the "black-belt" of alabama, mississippi and louisiana.

>>3280043
Virginia was originally settled by gentlemen and their lackeys from the west of England (running away from Cromwell), who were very much about priviledge and keeping the serfs in their place. It's a cultural trait that carried over in much of the south.

In New England, Pennsylvania, New York, the immigrants were from other places with a more middle class culture. Slavery didn't set so well with puritans and quakers, for instance.

Read "Albion's Seed" by David Hackett Fischer.

>>3280024
>Does multiculturalism require a strong authoritarian to keep different nations within the state from ripping each other apart?
Are you assuming multiculturalism only exist where there's several nations under the same state?

>>3280024
why do you assume that different ethnic groups are always in conflict? The trick is to avoid the formation of enclaves that live under different law (like europe's sharia law zones) and to give the different groups a common identity. the US has done a very good job of this.

>>3280028
Isn't that what it is? Several groups of distinct peoples under one government without an officially sanctioned favored group? How else would you describe multiculturalism?

>>3280051
>Multiculturalism
>give the different groups a common identity
???