How useful were they really in combat?
When was the last time an elephant was actually used in a war?
>>1931197
they spook horses and men
that's about it
>>1931197
They're mainly psychologically damaging. Seeing a squad of war elephants matching toward you had to have been one of the freakiest things ever. Luckily unless they were incredibly well trained with a lot of experience you could potentially spook them and they'd start running through their own army. I think the romans used a pig hung upside down, squealing like mad, to drive the elephants away.
>>1931197
>When was the last time an elephant was actually used in a war?
As a transport? likely Vietnam war.
As a fighting beast? Likely somewhere in the Raj in the 19th century
Allow me to explain the Trinity to you, and why the Filioque is heresy.
The Trinity is described often enough as "three in one," but what is this "oneness"? Well, it's essence, substance, yeah, but that's pretty abstract, and besides, humans also all share the same essence/substance, but they're pretty clearly not unified in the same way as the Trinity. Well, what makes the Trinity three is that there are three *distinct subjects*. But what makes the Trinity one is that there is only *one* will and *one* activity, the Father's will, the Father's activity (all acts by the Trinity are from the Father, by the Son, in the Spirit). I don't know if you can wrap your head around that, it's certainly mysterious, but that sums up why the Trinity is both three and one.
cont
>>1930845
Now, as to why the Filioque is heretical: first, let's examine what it means, because just changing the Creed unilaterally is a serious canonical violation, but it's not, per se, heresy (dogmatic violation). Some will say the Filioque means the Spirit proceeds from the Father, *through* the Son, as in the Spirit always wills and acts through the Son; that's actually not heretical, that's what the Orthodox believe. However, that's not simply what the Filioque means: if we look at the Council of Lyons, and at the Catholic Catechism, we see the Filioque is intended to mean the Holy Spirit proceeds from (comes from) the Father and the Son as *one principle*, which in Latin means clearly one source. This is where the Filioque gets seriously heretical, because when the Father begets the Son (which is not an isolation motion in time, but an ongoing and eternal relationship, the Son was always, is continuously, and will always be begotten of the Father--for those who do not know, this is not about the earthly incarnation, but about the eternal divine relationship with them), he also is providing the will and the activity of the Son; there being, once again, only one *divine* will and activity, the Father's. Now when the Holy Spirit is eternally proceeding from (come from) the Father, as a *principle*, the Father is also providing the Holy Spirit's will and activity, which is, once again, his own. Now here is what the Filioque is indicating: that the Holy Spirit comes from the Son and the Father as one principle, and therefore they both, in equal conjunction, provide the will and activity; this would mean the Son provides the *Father's* will and activity. Can you see how there's an issue with that? That's indicating the Son and the Father are jointly authoring the Father's will and activity. To say the Son shares in providing the Father's will and activity, totally distorts the oneness and simplicity of the Trinity.
FINIS
>tfw based Pope Sheev cited the Nicene creed without the Filioque
Biggest meme of humanity has been Christianity. It gets proven wrong and ignorant they just change the word of God and create a new denomination.
Lord bless me and send me a stripper yes haw
Was Prussia the greatest mistake in European history?
>>1924648
You mean Germany is general.
no. russian revolution was.
>>1924681
This.
Does the lack of consistently and scientific claims proven wrong in religious scriptures really disprove God? I believe they were created by man for political/cultural survival purposes, but I still have that gut feeling that not necessarily God exists but the afterlife.
This can't be it. My life is 1/3 over and I haven't done shit.
If you want religious answers, focus less on finding proof of a cause-effect relationship (behave this way and you'll get into the afterlife). That's just worldly thinking expanded to a larger sphere. You might as well get into transhumanism.
If you want a reason to religiously believe, start thinking about what it is about death that scares me.
>>1937556
Science has disproved the historicity of the Bible, but many Christcucks still cling to their kike worship by invoking the all powerful "MUH METAPHORS".
Sadly, there's no cure for retardation.
>>1937556
>My life is 1/3 over and I haven't done shit.
Embracing some sort of otherworldly something wont fix this; it'll only cause you to ignore this fact. Don't deny life.
Are any of you /his/ fags working in the field of history and humanities? If so how much do you make? How much schooling did you have to do? What does it entail? And finally how much dick did you have to suck to get it?
It's a field that I'm intrested in getting into, since i love it, but I've been convicted out of it by everyone around me. I live in Canada and appeantly there is no jobs in that field for me up here. I also have been told you have to know someone to get in.
Do you have a post doc? No?
>pic related
>>1937294
No, just getting started in college.
Into the trash I go....
What do you? Anything involved in history?
>>1937302
haha, no way. I'm political science but I switched out of history when I figured out there were no jobs there. If I recall correctly, the only stuff available is teaching, some stuff at museums, and some highly specialized bullshit. Basically since the market is saturated with history degrees, employers generally take those who have either distinguished themselves in some way or have the most degrees. Same as every other field, just 100x worse due to the severe over saturation.
Tell me about these guys. Why did they make people mad?
>>1937171
They were basically the Bernie Sanders/Donald Trump/Rodrigo Duterte of the Roman Republic. Complete populism that threatened to undermine the current power structure and societal norms, which is why the senate were so afraid of them.
they seemed to think plebs are important just because they are people too and there are a lot of them
>>1937181
I thought what they were doing was unconstitutional and thus illegal. Constitution is everything, it's what protected them from tyrants. I think the Gracchus brothers got what they deserved.
How was the Civil War able to come to such a peaceful end following the Civil War?
Why weren't any Confederate leaders or generals hung for treason?
Why didn't any southern troops attempt guerilla war?
is this a joke because that's exactly what happened?
>>1937059
Bushwhacker
>>1937088
No Confederate Leader was ever executed for treason, but a few nobodies were executed for war crimes.
Lee and Davis were allowed to die peaceful deaths.
Robert E. Lee was allowed to live as a free man, despite being directly responsible for the death of hundred of thousands of Americans.
What was the best punishment system in History that could be used today?
Imprisonment is retarded for 90% of crimes. Guy steals from you. They go to jail taken away from their innocent family. You don't get your money back and your taxes are paying for him to live free. Prison doesn't work. Recidivism rate is as high as 80%.
But at the same, cutting the hand off a thief like the Muslims do sounds barbaric.
Has there ever been an effective system in punishing law breakers that wasn't barbaric?
>>1936881
If someone breaks a law, they should be flogged publicly and then burned to death.
Easily identifiable permanent markings would be a cool idea, wouldn't it?
>>1936881
Emphasis on rehabilitation rather than punishment.
So if what our brain stores is data and it has a representation for the data, and we can use the data to imagine things and invent new contexts and so forth - how is the data our brain manipulates into existing any less material than the things we see?
Meaning, the things we imagine are just different combos of impulses, different paths followed etc - it's a pattern from where some abstract structure appears, and it's rooted in reality. So if a human really believes something to be true and it has left a mark in their brain, it's true right, as far as they are concerned - the data is there, it exists, we just don't have access to it?
If a person's reality and brain are so fragmented that they start having conversations with anime girls and imaginary friends, aren't those things real, but we just don't have the brain pattern to see them?
Isn't it a natural thing for us to create illusions to deal with things - for example metaphysically inspired behavior(burials, remembrance of past relatives, writing things so people in the future could read them after you're dea) seems to be a side effect of the way we were built.
Help.
>>1936764
Okay consider this
I had part of my brain removed, I lost no motor of cognitive functions or memories, and 1 year on my short term memory has improved since pre surgery.
Your brain doesn't store data, even my neurologist and brain surgeon said this. They don't know how memories work or how we retrieve memories, they just know the different parts of the brain that play a role in those functions.
The real question is, how can we know if anything can be real if our brain isn't real?
>>1936853
>Your brain doesn't store data,
it does
It supposedly works by changing synapse weights, basically how strong an ipsp or an epsp is, and how they sum
this isn't 100% understood and is a very simplistic model
there's people born with left half of the brain undeveloped, they still learn how to speak if they are trained, and aside from precise right body movements which they cannot do, you can't tell that they only have their right side of the brain
there is place for rearrangement in there
>>1936883
I had tons of neuropsychological testing done to see which hemisphere in my brain was dominant, to know if it would be safe for surgery. The psychologist somehow determined that my speech control and dominant handedness were in my left side of my brain so it would be safe to operate on the right side.
Even the psychologist said they're not sure where memories are stored or how they're retrieved, they only know the parts of the brain that store memory which is the hippocampus. But I only have 1 hippocampus and I have no trouble with memory now
Why do people think suicide is bad? This isnt me memeing, why shouldnt you be able to set a limit on how bad it gets?
>>1936641
Because of Christianism.
>>1936641
They are more concerned with the impact your death will have on others than your own choice to stop your suffering.
It shows how shitty utilitarianism is.
>>1936641
>Why do people think suicide is bad?
Permanent solution to a temporary problem.
I´m a anti-commie guy.
All life i think that the Nazi party was leftiest.So,over the last days,i went through some reflections,and i realized that the NSDAP,was of extreme-right.
Just because they have Workers in the name don´t mean that they actually are from Left.
But i want your opinion /his/.They were Left or Right?
>>1936545
Fascism doesn't really fit in the left-right paradigm, but if you HAD to pick one, it's clearly much more "right" than "left". The core of fascism is ultranationalism, in stark contrast to the internationalism of the left.
the radical leftist component was purged in the night of long knives
still, Hitler wasn't exactly a muh free enterprise kind of guy
>>1936545
I know this is fucking bait but yeah, NSDAP was extremely right wing for a variety of reasons, but it did have some extreme left wing policies such as an extremely high corporate tax. However, this corporate tax was part of a bigger deal they struck with companies where they gave some companies lucrative deals when usurping foreign industrial value post-conquests, IG Farben for instance, and extremely profiteable government contracts.
So yeah, whenever in doubt ask yourself this;
Is the movement ideologically Nationalist or Internationalist? From this you can deduce your answer.
However, at the end of the day, Far Right or Far Left are both misleading and useless monikers because any regime that operates on the extreme tends to be totalitarian in nature and by then ideas are nothing more than just tools to fool the masses.
Redpill me on crossbows. Are they really as useless as I've been told?
>>1936503
Yes they were useless, that is why Crossbows were used so much despite being costly and it's why crossbow using mercenaries worked for such a high wage.
So bad in fact that that Europeans frequently commented that it terrified Mongols and Saracens (presumable due to it's awful quality).
The fact that even English king garrisoned their French possessions with crossbow wielding folks alongside longbows is something of an oddity.
Though it must be said pavises do a lot of good.
no, they weren't useles
>>1936532
what an asshole
>>1936156
Oui il est magnifique.
>>1936156
Post cool ancient weapons from around the world
Pic related is a Mexica obsidian "sword"/club
>>1935813
>>1935813
mahuacuitl
Korean stone swords
Can somebody explain me how Japanese Girl gangs work in Japan '70s?
How lives look like with all this shitstorm.
How they fight and stay alive near another gangs.
Books and documentaries in English are welcome.
>>1935657
This is what happens to women that go without the subjugation of the Aryan penis.
I always thought it was an anime meme.
>>1935657
Did they get beat in or sexed in?