When did you realize the One True Religion is actually Zoroastrianism? I assume by now you've apologized to your parents for your juvenile "christian" phase.
>Year 2769 AUC
>Not being a Noahide.
Judaism is very obviously the correct religion, but I don't want to chop my foreskin off.
>>1937195
Islam is the on true religion, everybody knows that. The Jews had it right to begin with but fucked it up.
>>1937165
If there is a God then there's one thing I know: none of the religions men have come up with is true.
How did a tiny, rocky wasteland become the birthplace of Western civilization?
There were many more fertile, pleasant places in Europe, yet it was in Greece where we see civilization in Europe flourish for the first time.
because it's the part of europe closest to the middle east
High population density, access to eastern sea routes/trade/culture etc and limited land but substantial resources encouraging competition between microstates.
>>1936740
Its not cold, also Greece was covered in forest back in the neolithic era.
Was there any possible way for the South to win (or at least survive as an independent nation) the Civil War?
>Britain joins in after the Trent Affair.
>France looks into the future and decides to help too
Spain also looks into the future and hops in.
>>1937049
>joins
Fucking never
The MOST they'd do is recognize The South as an independent nation, which would kill Lincoln's chances of reelection in the North.
But British or French troops would never fight in the civil war
>It is recorded that the Polish cavalry slowly emerged from the forest to the cheers of the onlooking infantry, who had been anticipating their arrival. At 4:00 pm the Polish hussars first entered into action, battering the Turkish lines and approaching the Türkenschanze, which was now threatened from three sides (the Poles from the west, the Saxons and the Bavarians from the northwest and the Austrians from the north). At that point the Turkish vizier decided to leave this position and retreat to his headquarters in the main camp further south. However, by then many Ottomans were already leaving the battlefield.
>The allies were now ready for the last blow. At around 6:00 pm the Polish king ordered the cavalry attack in four groups, three Polish and one from the Holy Roman Empire. Eighteen thousand horsemen charged down the hills, one of the largest cavalry charges in history. John III Sobieski led the charge at the head of 3,000 Polish heavy lancers, the famed "Winged Hussars". The Lipka Tatars who fought on the Polish side wore a sprig of straw in their helmets to distinguish themselves from the Tatars fighting on the Ottoman side. The charge easily broke the lines of the Ottomans, who were exhausted and demoralized and soon started to flee the battlefield. The cavalry headed straight for the Ottoman camps and Kara Mustafa's headquarters, while the remaining Viennese garrison sallied out of its defenses to join in the assault.
>tfw you will never witness 150,000 turks be destroyed by 90,000 europeans, the largest battle in centuries
>won by the largest cavalry charge in history, by the invincible winged hussars
>in one of europe's largest cultural and population centers, after months of brutal sieging
one of the greatest mistakes in polish history
>>1936552
how so?
>>1936563
>>1936563
see pic
also fun fact : The Ottoman Empire was the only major country in the world which did not recognize the Partitions of Poland and still mantained diplomatic link even after the PLC ceased to exist
Why wasn't prophetry a thing in Europe like it was in the Middle East, i.e. for example some Viking claiming divine inspiration from a new god and cursing Odin as a dirty idol?
No psychedelic mushrooms?
>>1936102
The particular concept of prophet we have today as a monotheist iconoclast champion and moral reformer comes from the Middle East. You had plenty of holy men in Europe, just not ones that followed jealous and social engineering gods.
Because Arabs are goat race. Have you seen Tariqs big dick on XNXX fucking that Swedish chick from behind?
So I decided to return to university to study for a postgraduate degree in history
>over 50% of students female
>over 75% of professors female
>haven't spent a single seminar discussing actual historical events, only things like 'sex in the 16th century', 'race and racisms', 'inequality in early modern London' etc
>course convener openly said that readings are selected for diversity (at least one author must be female)
>same convener said that authors are removed for unrelated reasons (e.g. David Starkey was removed from all reading lists for his comments on the 2011 London riots)
>all history seems to be viewed through the lens of deconstructionist post-modernism
This isn't what I signed up for. I read Carlyle's 'Past and Present' and saw that the study of history can be pure joy and transcendental truth, and so thought I could dedicate my life to it.
The reality of modern academia seems to be the exact opposite. If I want to change this I would have to work my entire life against impossible odds.
I gave up my career to do this but feel like it was a huge mistake.
Any other anon's having issues with studying history at college/university?
>over 50% of students female
>over 75% of professors female
whats wrong with this? your other points are valid, but not these two.
>>1935827
a history of getting shit done is fucked. the progression of humanity with stop in its tracks for the sake of muh feels.
>>1935834
All leftist women want to talk about is inequality and how they were so oppressed.
Which one are you /his/?
Populares
Optimates
The Populares are clearly the best faction for the most people, but I just prefer the Optimates.
Hypothetically speaking, what would happen if Manstein and Guderian never did a revision of Fall Gelb, which allowed the panzers to break through Ardennes? Would the Germans get stuck in Belgium like in the previous war? Note that the OKW was initially against revision of plan, seeing it as madness.
Sometimes i get the notion that the Western campaign succeeded only because the panzers somehow miraculously got through Ardennes.
bump for good thread.
>>1937898
Why is it a good thread anon?
>>1935599
panzers somehow miraculously got through Ardennes
Are you the 1940 French high command?
Who really are the Turks and the turkish people ? I don't get the turkish identity. Are they Asians ? Did they really look like the Mongols ? What do people living in Turkey today have in common with Kirghizs, Mongolians, Uzbeks ? It seems to me that modern Turks have nothing in common with Central Asians. Turkish culture has seemingly no Asian influence, it's closer to Arabs and Greece. Aren't Turks just islamized Byzantines ?
Picture related : first result when I type 'turkish people'. She looks nothing like Erdogan or Mehmed II.
a language group
The people in turkey are originally Anatolians, Greeks, Armenians and other peoples
>>1932071
I often wonder this as well. If both Anatolia and Egypt were ruled by Turkic mercenaries (Ottomans and Mamlukes), why is Egypt 'Arab' and Anatolia 'Turkic'?
Post your favorite knight helmets, regardless of the era they were from.
>>1931508
>buttplug on top
>iswyd Hunz
Can anyone explain Wahhabism to me and how it's relationship with the House of Saud actually works?
It seems to be that the latter is completely self-contradictory. On one had, the Saudi fund the export of Wahhabism on a massive scale, yet at the same time they are terrified of it on their own home turf.
>>1930545
1) It served the purpose of the House of Saud. So fuck the Wahhabs, they can go away now.
2) Keeps the neighbors weak.
t.b.h. Saudi Arabia is the most undeserving of being a hegemon. It sickens me that more sophisticated Arabs listen to people from one of the most backward, xenophobic countries in the planet.
>>1930545
>yet at the same time they are terrified of it on their own home turf.
Wahhabism is an integral part of the Saudi state.
It was created by a retard that had no grasp of what Islam was. His family thought he was insane and his brother who was a reputable scholar wrote a book explaining how retarded he was.
There first order of business was killing a bunch of Shia Muslims and destroying Muslim artifacts, such as the graves of the Prophet's family. Very islamic.
They altered the Quran removing verses that they accuse of idol worship of Muhammad.
The mourning of a lost loved one is shirk because you idolate them by mourning, and will be killed.
They literally teach that you if you kill a Shia (Muslim) you will eat lunch with the Prophet in paradise.
Apparently committing a sins makes you a kaffir and they kill/torture you. And they make up their own definitions of what sins are. In Saudi Arabia there's been whippings of people simply for playing card games.
Why Saudi and many Gulf countries teach this horrible innovation of Islam I have no idea. I'm pretty certain it's politically motivated.
http://www.sunna.info/antiwahabies/wahhabies/htm/spy1.htm
Why is it okay to feel nostalgia for any decade you want as long as it's not the 1950s? Does white families living in the suburbs really trigger people that much?
>>1936900
You can feel nostalgia for whatever you want, you idiot, but who'd want to live in a society where smoking was considered good for you?
>>1936911
Because I smoke anyways and the suburb I live in is being overrun with heroin pushing Salvadoran gang members.
>Why is it okay... as long as it's not the 1950s?
according to whom?
So I'm reading about Alexander and I'm wondering how the hell did this guy get a good reputation? He's a kill crazy psycho tyrant taking over the world and mass murdering everyone in his path. Is it just because he's European he gets to be portrayed as some Enlightened conquoror spreading rationalism and Western civilization? He's not exactly spreading civilization, as he's conquoring areas that are already developed. Egypt's civilization is older than Greece's I mean, if this guy was Eastern and did the same thing he'd be demonized as Satan himself for all of history.
napoleon somehow gets the same treatmetn too when he's just a massive prick.
We seem to have this heroic warrior romantic image that we want to buy into.
Because it was a long long time ago and he kinda won.
>>1931866
I'm no expert on Alexander, but didn't his conquests ultimately cause a spread of Hellenic culture? I've heard that's why Buddhism has some Hellenic influences (or at least some types of Buddhism.)
I don't see why you take much issue with Napoleon though, a lot of his wars were defensive, and he wasn't completely contrary to revolutionary ideals like many people think he was.
> crazy
no proof
> mass murderer
no proof
fucking hell stop already the meme of Nicky II, he was not a good king, just good-looking and maybe a good person.
EUROPA deserves a second chance in this XX-XXI century timeline.
>>1931554
inb4 he already got a second chance
>>1931623
What you mean dude?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OkOSkm1Z41w [Embed]
The dude in this video is right, we all need to make sure our rights are clear and safe, regardless of religion or non-religion. The ore we divide ourselves, the more we become prey.
We have to be understanding of one another.
Let's not forget, America is also governed by the people, the truth is that the people can make the difference within themselves, amongst each other, and even for the rights of their neighbors in their countries.
>This board is dedicated to the discussion of history and the other humanities such as philosophy, religion, law,
This relates to religion, law, and application of philosophy to religion and law. This thread is not about politics, but about empowerment of unity, from a religious perspective, to preserve human rights and balance the law.
Yeah I dunno why they deleted the other thread.
This video shows how religious people are adapting tolerance in order to help everyone keep their rights.
>This board is dedicated to the discussion of history and the other humanities such as philosophy, religion, law,
>that happened at least 25 years ago
>>>/pol/
If you hate that /pol/ doesn't give a shit about your Muslims, then post on Reddit.
>>1939458
It's kind of political, but mainly the spirit behind it is philosophical
It is religious. The Muslim is talking about unity to protect our rights, is more philosophical than political, philo - love sophy - wisdom.
If we love wisdom, or "have philosophy", love for wisdom, we can see this isn't a political debate, but a stance of straight wisdom