Has there been a single war in America's history that was justified?
By justified I mean "Not motivated by America's elite's desire for expansion of power"
Yes.
>>2043658
>Hey, fellow elite Founding Fathers, let's take power away from the King and give it to ourselves!
Yeah?
>>2043652
1776
1812
Civil war
WWI
WWII
Korea
Basically everything except Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan, and our shenanigans in the Caribbean/Central America
I personally think Vietnam was only half un-justified (by that I mean the general motive, NOT Tonkin; that in itself was bullshit). Iraq was our single biggest bullshit move and I believe the world has been made shittier because of it
Is there any good books that cover the Viet Cong side of things that offers a good account of their tactics, methods and weapons?
Interesting in reading more on guerrilla warfare in Vietnam.
anorexic chinese rice farmers with AK-47s
>>2043599
Yeah but are there any books about them? Most Vietnam books seem to be the accounts of ex marines who have PTSD.
maybe in chinese. america had more interesting tales to spin.
How do I get into Asatru?
How do I find a group?
>>2043538
Dont. It's literally a top meme religion, anon. Imagine a cult of trump, 1000 years from now, and the only sources they had to use was anti-Trump propaganda they got from CNN
>>2043538
Just ask around about DnD and you'll find some likeminded peope
>>2043538
ask your elders, otherwise don't
Will Russia ever recover from communism? Or did it fuck them up eternally?
Maybe after Putin dies, assuming there are any republican institutions left.
why should they be back to feudalism? communism is part of their historical experience as a nation
>>2043504
Russia has been fucked up beyond repairer since Ivan the Terrible.
His actions are comparable to the French close to completely destroying Paris then declaring some peasant shithole to be France's new capital.
ITT: we discuss the Roman Empire
this triggers the snownigger
Daily reminder that the principate was a grotesque degeneration of the glory that was the republic.
>>2043473
Post yfw the only real successor state to the Roman empire was a bunch of turkroaches.
>mfw I exist.
>>2043435
>mfw you're just a figment of my imagination who thinks he exists
>>2043466
Proofs?
>>2043486
He's obviously a Sub-Saharan African congoid.
Is this a solution, or another problem?
It's just retarded. I'll steal David Deutsch's line here because he's a lot smarter than me.
Science is a manifestation of reason. Religious "faith" is explicitly a product of non-reason. Religion usually makes claims about the world that conflict with science.
John Worrall’s polemic about science discrediting religion is useful for demonstrating the
inconsistency of NOMA, due to his insistence that religion and science are not separate and in
irreconcilable conflict. Worrall argues that religion must make some descriptive claims about the
universe, i.e. “there is a loving creator”, and these can be about as general as one can imagine to
encompass all forms of religious thought. 11 Thus he is not just building a straw man of religion,
he is attacking a fundamental aspect of it. To make his point he quotes Barbour on the subject:
"Religious faith is not simply assent to the truth of propositions; but it does require the
assumption that certain propositions are true. It would be unreasonable to adopt or
recommend a way of life unless one believes that the universe is of such a character that
this way of life is appropriate." 12
If descriptive claims are necessary for religion then believers must ignore the basic evidential
requirements for knowledge proscribed by science for such claims. Ignoring the concept of
“faith” for a moment, let us hold religion to the same standards of science, by doing so we realize
that religions explanations of the universe fail just as quickly as science’s; due to lack of
evidence and the question of “Why?” Worrall attacks religion and NOMA by arguing that to
hold religion to a different standard (allowing for faith) would be unacceptably relativistic. 13 This
is a rather obtuse way of proclaiming all faith based religious should be thought to be devoid of reason.
While inflammatory, this is not an unjustified position. Religion eschews evidence, despite
arguing with the authority of a position that holds certain descriptive claims to be true. Thus
religious explanations for the universe are illusory when considered with the same logical
scrutiny as science’s explanations.
>>2043546
This poster is an idiot that doesn't know what he's talking about.
Science is the study of the natural world.
Religion is about the origin of the natural world, it goes beyond.
They are not mutually exclusive.
So i've got a thing for school
A little debate over France.
Their argument is that Napoleons invasion of Russia was not justified. This is dumb because Tsar violated treaties of Tilsit, which provoked Napoleons invasion.
However, their witness to this "war crime" is Jacques Macdonald, one of Napoleons generals.
Any tips on where to start? Or what kind of questions I could ask macdonald to get him to admit that Napoleons invasion of Russia was justified?
>>2043362
What war crime?
Russia breaking the treaty? Napoleon invading Russia?
Neither of those qualify has "war crime", justified or not
The only war crime during that war was the destruction of Russian cities and farms by the Russian army which caused the death of hundreds thousands of Russian civilians by starvation
>>2043362
>Or what kind of questions I could ask macdonald to get him to admit that Napoleons invasion of Russia was justified?
Remind them that the Napoleonic Wars were started by Britain (when they broke the Peace of Amiens in 1803)
Remind them that it's Britain that kept the wars alive by funding coalitions to launch wars of aggression against France (3rd, 4th and 5th coalitions)
Remind them that Britain was thus a threat to the existance of the French state and that Britain had to be dealt with for peace to be possible in Europe
Remind them that, given that France had no decent fleet, the only thing they could do against Britain was the Continental Blockade
Remind them that, by leaving that blockade and actively distrubing it, Russia was preventing France from possibly achieving a stable European Peace and made themselves a threat to the French state (thus making the invasion justified)
>>2043532
It confuses me too. I'm mostly look on how to relate why the invasion of Russia was justified to Jacques MacDonald through questioning.
What are some examples of language revivals/creations in which constructed languages actually managed to catch on and become living languages?
The fact that Israeli Hebrew not only became a thing, but a national language widely spoken today seems mindboggling to me. How was this possible?
It was either that, English, or Yiddish, and they weren't too happy with England and Germany at the time.
>>2044232
Herzl, the father of Zionism, thought they would use German and Yiddish. Though he was Austrian, so you would see why he would think that.
English was never in the running as the language of Israel. Before the revival of Hebrew, the movement was leaning towards Yiddish/German. French also had a very important place in Zionism because the wealthiest Jewish families were French, and the French Empire used Jews as magistrates over the Muslims.
basque and catalan
not that they ever totally disappeared but were forbidden under Franco
Why does no-one ever talk about China and their involvement in World War II?
All they did was fight the Japs a little and then become communist
Not much to talk about tbqh
>>2043207
In strategic terms it was a holding action on a continental scale but the real strategic initiative was held by the US in the Pacific Ocean.
If China had been given 30 years to industrialize under a strongman before Japan embarked on the 2nd sino japanese war things MAY have been a little different, but I'm not confident in this. Russia even under imperial rule was beginning to industrialize; China was literally a pre industrial society for the most part until the 50s
>>2043207
why does FDR look high in every picture lmao
You'd think there would be a sun worshiping major religion or something. Like a modern Atenism or something.
sun is too boring and predictable to be worshipped for any prolonged period of time once you breach a certain iq threshold desu
protohumans def worshipped it tho
>>2043163
Thelemites (the practicing ones at least) engage in sun worship four times a day.
>>2043163
Japs think the Emperor is related to the god of the sun.
Why are Eastern Religions so much more profound and useful than Western ones?
>Hinduism
Central concept is duty, fulfillment of which will release you from the exhausting cycle of rebirth
>Buddhism
Central concept: cessation of suffering
>Confucianism
Central concept: humaneness and importance of social order
>Daoism
Central concept: effortless living and not resisting the irresistible
>Judaism, Christianity, Islam
If you don't have the correct conception of the divine, you'll never achieve full happiness, full humanity, and salvation from death (which by the way is totally unnatural and should be feared).
>>2043143
>>Judaism, Christianity, Islam
Eastern religions
>>2043143
>Why are Eastern Religions so much more profound and useful than Western ones?
If you study western religions beyond Sunday school level discourse you'd find that's not the case.
Asians are more logical on average
What good examples are there of cultures destroying their own cultural and spiritual centers?
The destruction of temple complexes, sacred groves, statues, and monuments in the Roman Empire beginning with Constantine and reaching its prime under Theodosius.
>>2043133
French Revolution
Spanish civil war (commies)
Mao and his cultural revolution (commies)
Basically commies
>>2043133
Reformation.
And then a couple hundred years later the Catholics come to save everybody in a crusade planned long before Pope Urban the 2nd.
Because of coarse Muslims would lose to the true church...
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/vatican/esp_vatican33.htm
http://www.redicecreations.com/specialreports/2006/04apr/catholicislam.html
One factor was against Christian iconography and perceived decadence. Less of a foreign plot and more of a home-grown kneejerk reaction.
A Holy Roman Empire, perhaps?
A conglomerate of sort that was most likely not Holy, not Roman, and almost certainly not an Empire?
>>2043081
An emperor who couldn't control his vassals and they all killed each other in attempts to prove who was the strongest, mayhaps?
>>2043094
A union of miniature fiefdoms struggling for universal supremacy, perchance?