Can you clearly tell me even ONE non trivial thing nietzche said, or was he a Mr Motivator for pseuds?
>inb4 being obfuscatory is necessary
Sorry, state and explain your axioms
>axioms
>>>/r/VictorianEraFashions
>>2103768
axioms are only for math, you coffee shop fuck.
>>2103777
t.warrior of his daydreams
Reading about the false Dimitry, it really geeks surreal. How could such thing happened ? He didn't even seemed that bad, in fact, it seems like Peter the great realized many of his political projects
The only feasible explanation is that he was the real Dmitry all along.
>>2103756
I thought all historians pretty much agreed he was an impostor. But he apparently looked like him too
>>2103745
It's because Russians like to be treated like shit and degraded.
They don't understand what civilization and prosperity is, that's why they turned down possibility of being ruled by Polish nobles and later helped to burn Poland to the ground.
They're like pigs dwelling in shit. It's the only option they see.
What the fuck was his problem?
What causes someone to turn out the way he did?
nazi extremists gave him a sense of belonging, like in a cult
>>2103771
That and the chance to be somebody. Honestly read Hannah's book, he was a fuckup in his private life. Banality of evil is a fitting phrase for a very mediocre person like eichmann.
What did Eichmann do?
Would trotsky have been better for the soviets?
No, might not have beaten Hitler.
strange looking fellah, looks like a goblin or a gnome of some sorts
>>2103728
No, he was an ugly jew
It's been a few years now, so who was right un the russo-georgian War ?
8 years, not even close enough, but fuck it.
It was a dumbass move on Georgian part.
Imagine if Serbia attacked KFOR that same year.
>>2103742
Well, honnestly, in that case I could imagine Russia supporting Serbia
>>2103755
Just like they did in 1999, oh wait.
Russia doesn't have the reach.
has Hitlers failures pretty much made it impossible for a Nazi party to ever rise in power again?
>>2103690
No we'll see it in the next few decades.
It should have done but Globalism took the piss.
>>2103690
Explicitly yes. At least for the foreseeable future.
Otherwise no. All the problems that propelled the NSDAP to power are still around and liberal democracies still have no defence against the tactics they used, I'd say we're probably going to see more than a bit of neo-Nazi activity in our lifetimes.
>>2103699
>All the problems that propelled the NSDAP to power are still around and liberal democracies still have no defence against the tactics they used,
Explain
1. Is morality subjective?
2. For the above question, I used the search feature on this board and looked through many posts and summaries of scholarly views. Every single one of these views, whether posted by the reddit user or citing philosophers, simply presents different conclusions based on different assumptions that are presented without evidence. I'm sure these assumptions are either seen as axioms or are deduced from prior axioms.
So, based on that, why the hell does nobody simple say, "Yes, it's subjective."? Why the hell is the can kicked one metre down the road by saying something like, "No, morality is objective as long as you believe in Philosopher X's 'Munich-Hedgehog-Footstool Metaphysical Epistomological Formulation of Ethics'", or towards any other axioms that you would then have to defend? Obviously this shifts the question to why I should trust the axioms to the system, but this is never answered (or admitted to be ultimately futile, or ultimately an appeal to emotion / intuition).
Feel free to ignore this paragraph if you're easily offended: It seems to me that anyone who chooses not to play the "Market your unfalsifiable theory based on evolution-religion-feelings" game self-selects their way out of philosophical discussion, so you'll rarely have someone like me who says, "Yes". But I know this board is sensitive to criticism of philosophy (i.e. meta-philosophy (i.e. philosophy, that you don't like)) so I won't go on and I am presenting things in this overly apologetic style. Feel free to tell me why I'm wrong.
>>2103659
dropped
Morality is a spook.
>it's a reddit philosopher thread
Still in college?
Happy Birthday, Simo~
>>>/k/ is that way
>>2103652
I guess we can take all those historical warfare threads and send em off to /k/ too :^)
>>2103652
>>>/reddit/ is that way
How much of the story of Madame LaLaurie's chamber of horrors is true?
Some of the abuses sound cartoonish. In her time how would a person survive having there limbs all broken then reset backwards and other such accounts?
>>2103541
>>2103541
Bump for interest. I know nothing on the subject
/x/'s pathetic attempt on a /his/ thread.
How could Germans claim Versailles was an unfair treaty, when Brest Litovsk was an infinitely harsher arrangement?
>>2103529
Tbh, Finland was free already at that point.
Germany occupied essentially all of the land they demanded and Russia was in such a precarious position with their army in full collapse that Germany could quite easily have captured Petrograd/St. Petersberg & crushed the nascent Boshelvik nation.
Compared to Versailles where German territory was untouched, the line was suffering breakthroughs true, but it would have cost the allies hundreds of thousands or even millions of lives to march on and occupy Germany.
>>2103533
Well a german prince would have inherited the area if the germans had won.
JUST FUCK MY SHIT UP: /his/ edition
All that he worked for is going down the shitter now lMAO
>>2103471
I'm sure he had fun while it lasted.
>>2103471
>I never said anything about gulags, you georgian shit
Can someone recommend a good documentary or books focusing on the 30 years war?
>>2103766
/thread
Didin't know the 30 years war was so horrible. Remeber reading about it in class when in middle school. So i was like 11-12. (20 now) Since I'm from sweden, it was mostly focus on our part, and gustav adolf II. I think now in hindsight that my teacher was super biased, I remember her talking about how the "lion from the north" was the coolest man ever and stuff. I think she was dissapointed at how irrrelevant we had become so she tried to Romanticise the whole war. Well, I guess he couldn't really takl about how horrible it was either since we were so young.
>the day is November 12th 1918
>you are sitting in a chamber in Versailles, with the world map in front of you and pen in your hand
>all of the world leaders are awaiting outside, to rearrange the world however you please
>there are just two rules: Europe, Japan and USA have to remain sovereign and the rest of the world can't
>you need to ensure everlasting peace after this deal
How should have they done it /his/?
>>2103288
Kill every last person in Germany, Turkey, Austria and Hungary.
>>2103303
>i'm fifteen and badass: the post
Destroy G-rmany
In history, how many people have been killed in the name of democracy?
not enough. the demos thirsts for more blood
That pic reminds me of those illustration of north korean labor camps. I'd venture a guess that its less than any other form of government that's been widely applied
>>2103275
This isn't a dick measuring contest. I just want a number.
Jesus HIMSELF never said he was God or worship him.
Instead, it is the exact opposite of what he's saying:
John 14:48 :
....My Father is greater than I
John 10:29:
My Father, who has given them to me, is greater than all...
Unless you've the balls to prove me wrong.
Paul is the founder of Christianity, not Jesus. All of you are reading are the teaching of Paul. Paul wrote 82% of the New Testament.
Ever heard of a red-lettered Bible? The red-lettered represents what Jesus is talking. And 21 out of 27 of the New Testament doesn't even have a red-letter written in it.
So, what does Jesus says?
For all I know, Jesus brought a man-ly religion, as in Ezekiel 18:20 :
20 The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him.
If you do good, heaven is a place for you. If you sin, then hell is the place for you.
NOT that if you commit sins, someone gonna go die for you.
JUST... read my post will ya.
You can prove me wrong if you want, your salvation depends on it.
Use that 'spirit' within you and call this bullshit. Just remember who's your master. Jesus or Apostles?