THESE are the famous Nordic Etruscans??
>Nordic Etruscans
Did I miss something? Last time I checked the meme was still that Etruscans were filthy Semites/Asians the Nordic/European Romans overthrew because of their degeneracy or whatever.
>>3299767
They were from Anatolia apparently
>>3299733
What's your point, that's about the complexion of most Swedes and germans
Hey I'm here to talk about Madagascar, if you guys have questions let me know and I'll answer.
>>3299679
Madagascar is rightful SEAsian clay. The Blacks that live there do not belong there.
So you guys are basically Filipinos right? I had a friend from Madagascar he totally looked Filipino and would get mad when I told him even though after enough drinks he'd admit to SE Asian ancestry.
11 years of war for independence, then neighbour rapes you steals your land, then european powers takes turn raping you.
"the most shocking single event in the history of the first republic: the capture of Guerrero through an act of betrayal and his execution a month later."[29]. An Italian merchant ship captain, Francisco Picaluga, approached the conservative government in Mexico City with a proposal to lure Guerrero onto his ship and take him prisoner for the price of 50,000 pesos, a fortune at the time. Picaluga invited Guerrero on board for a meal on 14 January 1831. Guerrero and a few aids were taken captive was turned over to federal troops. The government's 50,000 peso payment to Picaluga was exposed in the press. Despite pleas for his life, Guerrero was executed by firing squad in on 14 February 1831. His death did mark the dissolution of the rebellion in southern Mexico, but those politicians involved in his execution paid a lasting price to their reputations.[30]
Many Mexicans saw Guerrero as the "martyr" and his execution was deemed "judicial murder". The two conservative cabinet members considered most culpable for Guerrero's execution, Lucas Alamán and Secretary of War José Antonio Facio, "spent the rest of their lives defending themselves from the charge that they were responsible for the ultimate betrayal in the history of the first republic, that is, that they had arranged not just for the service of Picaluga's ship but specifically for his capture of Guerrero."[29]
Historian Jan Bazant speculates as to why Guerrero was executed rather than sent into exile, as Iturbide had been, as well as Antonio López de Santa Anna, and long-time dictator of late-nineteenth century Mexico, Porfirio Díaz. "The clue is provided by Zavala who, writing several years later, noted that Guerrero was of mixed blood and that the opposition to his presidency came from the great landowners, generals, clerics and Spaniards resident in Mexico...Guerrero's execution was perhaps a warning to men considered as socially and ethnically inferior not to dare to dream of becoming president."[31]
>>3299539
colonized by catholics. they never had a chance
>>3299588
>get colonized by protestants
>get holocausted
great
Why was the Mexican Reconquista so successful? Do Gringos fear the Mexican Warrior? pic related.
The natives are simply reclaiming stolen land.
>>3299513
Because aparently having laws is racist.
>>3299547
The only law of history that is universal is the law of conquest, gringo. You took the Far North of Mexico by force and turned its inhabitants into second class citizens. The racial motivations behind the war are plain for all to see. But now, the Mexicans are only reclaiming their natural lebensraum from the weak eurangutans, and now you cry your crocodile tears about enforcing arbitrary laws to save your delicate race of pink rats.
Teach me some curse words and vulgar slang from ye olden days /his/
>>3299478
Cock robin
>>3299478
Shakespeare Insult Kit:
http://www.pangloss.com/seidel/shake_rule.html
>>3299478
cvck
I was born in a so-called mestizo family and it always boiled my blood that the Habsburgs defiled our pristine pre-colombian civilization and replaced it with a brutal degenerate extractive economy to fund Charles V's wars. I take great pride that the noble descendants of the Aztecs (of which I am one) were able to get revenge by killing the descendant of Charles V, the infamous Emperor Maximilian, a known French Puppet of the manlet cuck Napoleon. I, for one, think this Eurangutan's death was justified 100% to avenge the Aztec (Mexican) nation.
Vae victis
>>3299443
But all modern day Mexicans are Spanish bastards of varying degrees.
ITT: Things brainlets say
>The US lost the Vietnam war!
The U.S. committed genocide against the natives.
>The Civil War wasn't about slavery
>>3299433
>Germany started World War I
Who really won the 1960 election?
>>3299383
the guy who got to sit in the white house.
The guy who didn't get shot by the CIA
fun fact: Hillary Clinton, as a teenage girl living in the Chicago suburbs, was a staunch Republican who believed that the 1960 election was stolen
When would WW1 have started if Franz Ferdinand wasn't assassinated in Sarajevo?
>>3299377
March 3rd 1916 at 14:53:22 pm, GMT.
How the fuck would we know? We might surmise where tensions might brew in the future, but it's hard to guess when exactly the keg blows given that the assassination was almost a failure and occurred through dumb luck.
>>3299377
Are you familiar with the infinite multiverse theory?
>So basically somewhere between sometime soon after and never.
>>3299377
The real question is who would have won between 1941 austro-hungary and 1917 serbia?
how do I become an anglican?
I grew up christian / protestant. became atheist, now I see the error of my ways and would like to go back to religion. I like the aesthetics of catholicism but I don't know anything about it. anglicanism seems like a good middle ground between the two.
can some one fill me on anglicanism? or try to convince me to become protestant or catholic.
>>3299320
Trust in the LORD with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding. In all thy ways acknowledge him, and he shall direct thy paths.
-Proverbs 3:5-6(KJV)
>>3299320
From what I know Anglicanism is the result of Henry viiis ordeal, he made the bishops of England recognize him as head of the church in England. At first they were identical to the Catholic Church in terms of having ordained priests, bishops, 7 sacraments, Latin mass. But after the death of Henry, bishop Cranmer instituted continental Protestant reforms and abolished the mass, reformed the rite of ordination, introduced Lutheran theology into the Anglican code of beliefs from 1547-1551. When Queen Mary I inherited the throne she made all Anglican bishops rejoin the pope(which they gladly did because many disagreed with the Edwardine reforms), they brought back the latin mass, and ordination rites of priests and bishops. This process continued until Elizabeth I inherited the throne in 1558 when she tried to make the bishops accept the Edwardine Anglican reforms which failed because almost all of the bishops refused this time and got deprived from their sees and expelled to mainland Europe. Elizabeth then brought back actual Protestant Calvinist minded English theologians from Switzerland to become Protestant Anglican bishops and clergymen. Many of these guys eventually formed Puritanism-evangelical low church Anglicanism. Later on some Anglicans formed high church Anglicanism which was a copy of Catholicism many of which have formed the ordinariate catholic churches in communion with the pope in 2012.
Are Christians still under Old Testament Law? If not, what did Apostle Paul mean by this...
>Do we, then, nullify the law by this faith? Not at all! Rather, we uphold the law. (Romans 3:31)
Also, are Christians saved by faith alone or must they do good works. If they are saved by faith alone, what did Apostle Paul mean by this...
>For we are God's handiwork, created in Christ Jesus to do good works, which God prepared in advance for us to do (Ephesians 2:10)
And finally, how does one define "good works" if not by the law? If you are saved by faith alone but must still do "good works", doesn't God define good works as obeying the law? Which would then in essence mean that you must obey the law?
>>3299225
Who the hell cares?
What's wrong with the OT? It has some pretty boss stories in it.
if you'd like, you could go to biblehub.com and read notes/expositions from theologians on these specific passages
Was there ever a war that mimicked the Eastern Front in WW2. Reading up on it... holy shit, the level of brutality, destruction, and pure hatred is sickening. Entire cities wiped out, tens of millions dead, men starving and dying from hypothermia en masse, officers shooting their own men -- a war of annihilation.
Taiping Rebellion. Mid 19th century. 30,000,000 dead.
That's a lot of minie balls.
Thirty years war
Which city was wiped out
Look guys, we're well trained to Napoleonic Wars tactics
We surely will win this war before Christmas!
>>3299214
>Look guys, we're well trained to Napoleonic Wars tactics
*Franco-Prussian War tactics.
>>3299214
The Germans were the ones who adapted the fastest.
>>3299566
They're also the ones who started this whole trench warfare shit by digging like faggots after the French repulsed them at the First Marne
The French then dug as well and it turned into attrition warfare
What are your thoughts on the resource curse?
>>3299209
It's hilarious because it's an accidental remonstrance to the environmental determinism mentality that "well of-course the west succeeded England has loads of lush green fields and coal and loads of pre-domesticated animals" or some shit.
If conservatives weren't ran out of humanities departments, we'd all have a much more coherent understanding of the world.
But whatever we're not allowed to talk empirically here as the leftists who run this board know empiricism is a dark-art practiced by racists.
Better we allow the ills of our world to exacerbate than talk honestly about race.
resource curse is all but irrelevant as an explanation for africa's woes
>>3299285
brains are in reverse order
>Roman legions
>Ancient Macedonian army
>Mongol Army under Gengis Khan
>Spanish Tercios
>Grande Armée
>Wehrmacht
>Current US Army
Anything else?
Well, you will have to go with the US Army, simply because of it's technology. Any other army has less numbers and is not that technologically advanced.
Second would be the Wehrmacht, it's morale was probably the best.
The "Roman legions" is a pretty broad term. When Rome fell it consisted of mercenaries to a great extend.
The Unsullied.
>>3299157
Fucking autists. The point is to compare contextually, as to how did the roman Imperiak army compared to an average Army at the time and then compare that to the U.S. and how it also compares. I swear you retarded faggots need everything spelled out. I still go for the U.S. though.