Archived threads in /his/ - History & Humanities - 207. page

Oh so the shitfest that was 17th century has its own name? Neat.
Well it's very interesting. Probably paved the way for enlightenment.

because we have never been truly modern

People literally want to believe.

>>3302493

Homosexuality is a choice

>>3302493
He was a homosexual and beta virgin

Also he had a micropenis with one testicle

He wanted to kill anyone who had brown hair and brown eyes and SPOILER...HE had brown hair and brown eyes...

They meant that Huerta's regime was a fucking joke

File: 1500724172289.jpg (199KB, 720x960px) Image search: [Google]

199KB, 720x960px

>>3302409
So imagine you were a civilan after ww1,food was basically non-existent,the fascist and communist would kill you if you weren't on their side,bet you would have been violent too.

File: Socdem_furs.png (146KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

146KB, 800x800px

>>3302409
Because they were animals

File: wtf.gif (2MB, 280x202px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 280x202px

>>3303066

File: 20170729_153332.png (144KB, 248x450px) Image search: [Google]

144KB, 248x450px

Problem, carrots?

File: medieval_armour_in_milan_style.jpg (25KB, 312x630px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 312x630px

>>3302392
Non, pas du tout

>>3302392
Friendly reminder that Jeanne is the one true waifu.

>wars separated by 20 and then 50 years
>being surprised that they had time to replenish manpower

is that dog autistic?

Did the legionary not get rewarded with land and priviliges after services?

>Tfw will never receive land to grow wine and olives

File: Constanza.jpg (34KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 600x600px

>>3302238
>No centrally planned economy
>How was it different from socialist countries

Also,

>Socialist countries like Nazi Germany

>>3302265
Who do you think plans the economy in authoritarian states like the Confederacy and Nazi Germany? Those were centrally planned. You had to follow in line just like in other Socialist countries.

File: Constanza2.png (457KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

457KB, 600x450px

>>3302269
>Means of production not owned by workers who operate them
>Socialist

>>3302172
>Do I have every commoner on my land swear fealty to me the moment I get my lordship?
Depends on how high a lord you are. If you are the lord of a Manor, a knight or something, yes, if you are the duke of Burgundy, no, obviously not.

>How do I get men to join my retinue, do I command them to do so or hire them?
Depends, some will be the sons of your vassals if you are an actual lord (Baron, Count, Duke, Marquis etc), some will be hired guns with a lotta loyalty. If you are a simple lord of a single manor, your retinue will likely be entirely paid, maybe a yeoman or two, as the only people on your lands besides you are peasants and freemen.

>Can I conscript the peasants whenever I feel like it and raid my neighbor's lands?
I mean you can raise your levies whenever you want in theory, but if you do it in harvest time, you're going to lose money on lost crops, and people might even starve, you also better have some way of feeding and compensating your levies during the time spent not working the land.

Whether or not you can go picking fights with your neighbours all depends on the political situation in your kingdom. If the HRE is in one of its regular civil wars, yeah sure, no one will care. If you are a manorial lord in the royal demesne of the King of France, you better have a DAMN good reason, or the King will fuck you up.

>>3303715
Cont.

>Do I personally dictate how high the taxes and tariffs are? Can I go over and fuck any woman in my lands with no (legal) repercussion?
You can tax people as much as you want, yeah. What are the peasants going to do? Revolt? Yes actually.

No you can't go around raping women. Well, you can so long as you can pay the local sheriff to not care.

>Can I personally own businesses and farmsteads and whatnot? Why not get all of them in my land and reap all the profits directly?
You pretty much own all the land anyway. The farmers pay you by giving you some or most of their harvest. The guilds and whatnot will pay you rents, usually in money. Corporations don't really exist. You can patronise a guild if you really want, but exporting things is very difficult and you will likely have very little local market value, due to everyone on your land being peasants (unless you're literally a Duke with great towns and cities in your demesne). Shit is expensive, complicated, and there is no guarantee you will do anything but waste money, because there is no stock exchange, and information takes weeks to get anywhere. Plus your shit will constantly be being stolen by corrupt merchants and bandits and hungry peasants and whatnot.

>>3303722
Cont. Mk II

>How much influence does the local bishop and the local aristocracy have in my lands?
A lot.

The church has massive influence. If the local bishop decides you are a faggot, your life will very quickly become very hard.

The local aristocracy's influence again depends on how high up you are, and how powerful they are. If you are a manorial lord of very low standing, the Baron whose land you rent can literally impoverish you if he decides that you did something to break your oath of fealty and kick you off his land. If you are the Duke of Burgundy, you have a massive army, a vast treasury and can sway and even threaten the King of France to comply with your demands, if one of your vassals steps out of line you can literally wipe him from existence if you really want.

>And finally can I legitimize my bastards or do I need to speak to some higher authority for it?
Ask the church.

Maybe.

>>3302164
Wouldnt that be Leif Eriksson

>>3302532
This was 500 years earlier

File: hapsburg.jpg (13KB, 219x300px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 219x300px

no

File: Abraham_Lincoln_O-77_matte_collodion_print.jpg (266KB, 560x700px) Image search: [Google]

266KB, 560x700px

no

File: Charles II and Pregnant Anne Frank.jpg (151KB, 575x901px) Image search: [Google]

151KB, 575x901px

no

Dumb tier: Anarchist Catalonia
Mediocre tier: Francoist Spain
Higher tier: Republican
God tier: Falangist government led by Primo de Ribera and Franco dead in a ditch.

>>3302157
Transcendence: Bourbon main line
Gnosis: Carlist Spain
Theosis: Habsburg Spain

File: 14545048672909.jpg (41KB, 660x435px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 660x435px

>>3302151
>republicans will defend killing your political opponents if their are monarchists.

File: wasserzeichen-projekte.jpg (666KB, 1000x1484px) Image search: [Google]

666KB, 1000x1484px

>>3302108
Looks very similar to an image from paulus hector mair's manual. The section on armored fencing, from the munich codex.

>>3302108
>the knight on the right holding his sword
Wont the bullet go back towards him?

>>3302304

Thanks, but I checked and it doesn't seem like it.

He's not talking about the women.

>>3302073
No shit faggot

>>3302069

>Alexander the Great
>God in the Singular

What?

>>3302031
The early church was not ruled by either. Various bishops had more power than others over disputes but bishops mostly decided themselves what the limits of Orthodoxy were,

It was only once it became legal that they started having large gathering and arguing, before that they just wrote letters and stuff

The early church was mostly regional. There were local groups of presbyters or individual presbyters (I'm not entirely convinced the monarchical view of presbyters or bishops characterized the primitive Church), but councils weren't really common, and certainly not catholic, in the earliest days. The ecclesiastical structure of the primitive Church was, as far as I can tell, not really settled, though the principle of elders and deacons are as old as the church itself.

In the Nicene Church, each of the Five Patriarchs, including the Pope, were essentially equal. The Pope ostensibly gained primacy because he was descended from Peter, but that wasn't absolute.

The Pope gained prominence in the West, because he was the closest Patriarch to the Western Regions