Archived threads in /his/ - History & Humanities - 1973. page

>>2237194
Well-managed hunting, like we have in Missouri, can actually benefit wildlife populations. There is a great deal of science behind wildlife management. If you're interested, look up some articles in the Journal of Wildlife Management.

>animals taken out of the wild and domesticated, placed into a manmade environment where they become property from which value is derived from

Am I describing livestock or pets? You decide, you fucking contradictory hippies.

>>2237210
I often have heard many vegans say that these benefits are a myth and the need for hunting is artificially created to ensure hunting season

>http://bitesizevegan.com/environmental-societal-impact/deer-hunting-overpopulation-solution-or-cause/

>>2237177
Maybe he just really didn't want to lose.

Trump is literally Nixon

>>2237193
Trump is nothing like Nixon, Nixon was a skilled political operator, sure he was a crook, but he was a crook who knew about policy and international relations, things I wouldn't ascribe to trump.

>>2237139
We had it once, it sucked ass.

Hierarchy based on merit is simply superiour. Both more effective and more humane.

>>2237178
>Hierarchy based on merit
so genes then?


you don't become an Olympic level swimmer without the genes for it

Cletus and luane Marie's son has a near zero chance of advancing particle physics

because it's in direct counter to the quintessential human right of free will

>>2237101
Calvin was better on the Eucharist

>>2237101
"This is my body," - Jesus Christ
>trusting some guy who came 1500 years after Christ to tell you what Christ really meant

>>2237101
>Latin
Satanic occult babylonian illuminati detected.

File: IMG_0868.png (152KB, 504x349px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 504x349px

Keep in mind Hitler had no desire to nuke or enslave the rest of the world

>>2237084
same, with perhaps less fucked up eastern Europe and more commie parties since Communism would not be so discredited

>>2237084
There are probably like a million answers to that question and your questions too vague to start off with. Did the central powers win or lose? If they won how would a WW2 start in this timeline? So on and so on. You don't give a proper basis for people to even try to start answering your question.
Conclusion: Don't ask irresponsible "what if" history questions

>Greek empire
>collapsed
>Roman empire
>collapsed
>White empires
>not collapsed

You tell me.

>>2237088
You are retarded.

File: Ardagh Chalice (8th-9th century).jpg (2MB, 1300x1643px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1300x1643px

>>2236573
Aside from just being interesting, even history which doesn't seem to matter that much generally does have an effect on the world today. When Europeans colonised Africa they didn't just wipe the slate clean and replace the past with their own civilization (like they did in Australia); they established some established some of their institutions and technology over earlier societies whose social, political, religious, economic, agricultural and other cultural practices and institutions still shape life in those places today. You might know where African technology and government institutions come from, but you wouldn't know anything beyond that. This applies everywhere. You wouldn't know anything about why Japan, China, India and Kenya are so different. You wouldn't know why the Islamic world is the way it is, or why the Australians were wiped out while Africans are still around, or why

I'd say some history is more important than others, and generally if you learn about the line of civilizations that goes, roughly, "Mesopotamia/Egypt - Greeks/Romans - Muslims/Christians - Western Europe and colonies," then you'd learn most of the most important the developments shaping the modern world, but you'd be missing major parts of the story like the domestication of horses and maize, the development of gunpowder and Indian numerals, and countless other things essential to the modern world. Furthermore as I said above, you'd only have the vaguest knowledge of most world regions, meaning you'd really only understand a handful of modern Western societies, and even those not completely.

Of course a lot of it we do just research because it's interesting. Irish metalworking and Mayan vase paintings don't really matter, but they're interesting so who cares?

>>2236573

History is valuable because it tells us the kinds of solutions humans come up with to various situations. We may never have to survive as hunter gatherers again, but by examining hunter gatherer societies we can learn many interesting truths about all humans, and thus, about ourselves.

An intelligent man makes it his mission to learn everything about everything. Nothing is worth more than anything else and everything must be studied.

Well Christians and white men were evil and they were persecuting astronomy to keep people of color down. Not much has changed in 3,000 years.

File: Nikolaus_Kopernikus.jpg (64KB, 556x648px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 556x648px

>>2236542
>mfw christfags rule out heliocentrism because the bible says so

>>2236596

Copernicus was a priest

>>2236516

Right to Try laws are being enacted to provide an alternative to fascist Soros Right to Die laws

With this right to try non-standard, effective drugs and therapies become available, like cryoimmunotherapy, instead of the old and failed chemo/radio

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_try

>>2237920

That's hardly a relevant alternative, it's something completely different.

>>2237927
explain

>>2236510
I don't think he could. Paris was the biggest city in western Europe. The armies at that time were slow and costed a lot to maintain. Philip II probably had in mind the siege of Metz where his father completly failed. Besides, the garnison in Saint Quentin hadn't surrender yet.

>>2236510

He already got pretty much everything he wanted from the war; the three Bishorphics, and confirmed Hapsburg domination in Italy. Why extend the campaign?

>>2236510
Are we talking about the same guy who thought attacking England the same way that the Normans did was a good thing? Or are we talking about a guy who got all of Portugals colonies in a personal union and he still went bankrupt multiple times. Though most were before 1580

of course they were.
They were horny teenagers.

>>2236508

> I imagine a couple of 13 year olds weren't expected to consummate the marraige on their wedding night?

you imagine wrong

> I imagine a couple of 13 year olds
13 year old an 25-30 year old*

File: 170px-Adolf_Hitler-1933.jpg (10KB, 170x246px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 170x246px

Another picture. Again, notice the eyes. If he were alive today he would be locked away in an assylum. How fucked up was the world back then that such a schizophrenic could rise to the highest rank in a modern European country?

>revisionism: the thread
I ain't a nazi by a long shot but this is some commie bullshit.

>>2236353
Well, you have the current leader of Germany letting a million rapists into the country.

>A radical muslim made more sense
>2017

Adulthood is realising neither made sense

>>2236196
>you will never remove whitey with X
Why even live?

>>2236194
bump

>>2236371
Any actual answers?

bump for interest, OP

>>2236153
Catholics aren't Christian

>>2236153
>Fall of Rome
Not this meme again. Roman empire reached highest point after about 300 years after this "fall".

>>2236172
>H
>R
>E

and Eastern
>R
>E

Please. The only true Roman Empire fell in 476, not in 1453 or 1806.