If Marx rebirth and sees all those atrocities that were committed under his name. What would he do? Would he kill himself.
>You have it all wrong retards, let me show you it was was supposed to be
>Oops!
>>2260275
He approved of revolutionary terror so no
>>2260349
No my friend, you got it all wrong, I guess you'll just have to
>Let ME show you how it was supposed to be
>Oops!
>read Plato
>bored to death as he spends 80 pages wondering whether names are just labels or reflect the true nature of things
1. I've mentioned this in passing and apart from being insulted by people, nobody has defended this. Can someone explain this? This is just fucking stupid.
Hard mode: Don't scream some obviously BS "literary interpretation".
Hard mode: Don't say something desperate like, "Well clearly Plato taking a shit was an essential precursor to Mathematical physics in the year 2000!"
2. The Greeks seem so naive, as if they believe that "The Official Objective Morality (to)" will pop up out of thin air if they discuss it hard enough. Similarly with the answer to the above question. How the HELL do contemporary philosophers get away with it? Why does nobody call them out?
Why is it that when you point this out, or mention that modern philosophy is only one out of infinitely many viewpoints, you get abused?
>>2260237
They get away with it because they're working with the very beginnings of "advanced" philosophy in their society. They are building the memes that philosophers after them built their works on.
>>2260237
>Why is it that when you point this out, or mention that modern philosophy is only one out of infinitely many viewpoints, you get abused?
>infinitely many viewpoints
The basic premise of postmodernism is that all viewpoints are equal. Most universities and current philosophers are postmodern, thus no objective truth exists according to these schools of thought. Still, postmodernism is inherently contradictionary. Any attempt to debate on postmodernism in an academic setting goes like this:
>a:all viewpoints are equal
>b:I disagree on that
>a:Then you're wrong!!
>b:how can my viewpoint be wrong if you said that all viewpoints are equal?
>a:Stop mansplaining you fascist nazi!!!
>b: But it goes against logic since you contradict yourself
>a: "logic" was just an invention by men and used to oppress womyn
Sadly, politics has overtaken universities, liberals study philosophy to feel elitist and/or more intellectual than their peers. So, no questioning of the point of it all is allowed.
>>2260343
Not sure if you're insulting me but I'm not saying that all viewpoints are equal, only that infinitely many exist.
Also if we all started to have a debate about which criteria to use when judging viewpoints, there would still be infinitely many and the criteria for the criteria would have the same issues.
Were the Founding Fathers libertarians?
>>2260153
Were the Romans Italians?
George "kill them and burn their crops" Washington was probably a classical liberal.
>>2260153
They were liberals. To avoid sementic confusion we call them "classical liberals"
This board needs more blunt force trauma. Post weapons that don't need sharp edges to fuck you up.
Did the barbarians use clubs against roman plate?
>>2259907
ok
>>2259910
Roman plate...?
Where can I go to make a mask like this or similar made?
Is it expensive?
(It's from the Kingdom of Heaven film)
>>2259807
Sardinia
>>2259819
Interesting.
Do Blacksmiths make this stuff?
iraq
This guy has been feared by many of his time as one of the main possibilities of taking over via armed coup, and being successful at it. FDR noted him as 'one of the most dangerous men in America'.
What would America have looked like under Dugout Doug?
China would have been nuked crisp
>>2259761
Most likely Korea too. The Soviets didn't have the nukes nor delivery system for MAD in the late 40's, they bluffed and Doug would've probably called their bluff.
>>2259756
>main possibilities of taking over via armed coup
Is there any reading to do on this?
Or could you provide a synopsis?
>a rat-like creature can eventually evolve into a horse
>but it is completely impossible for a striped horse to evolve horse like behaviour
Why do people give Guns Germs & Steel so much credit?
Easy way to explain away why sub-Saharan Africans were and still are such failures.
These are tamed animals, not domesticated and that's an enormous difference.
>>2259744
yes, but the idea that it is physically impossible to domesticate zebras sounds almost like creationism
What exactly is the principle of talos?
Skyrim for the Nords
ffs is this /his/ or /v/?
Motivate why Gallipolli was a British victory
it wasnt
>mobilize half million against a third undersupplied turds
>lose over 70% of your army
>>2259703
>kill lots of Turks
>loot Turkey
>send our aristocracy on holiday abroad
How is that a loss?
Australian defeat =/= British defeat
East Asian people evolved for tens of thousands of years on the steppes of Central Asia before being chased out into modern-day China and Japan due to decreasing rains.
As a result, they maintain an atavistic Lamarckian node of memory that both animates their dreams and haunts their nightmares.
Asians, what is it like to dream of open steppes that you have never visited before, but can see just as clearly as though they surrounded you?
What is it like to dream of "The Great Thirst" that drove your people across the mountain ranges of western China? Or when you dream of empty streams and dying horses?
There are many accounts of far-flung Asians (like Japanese-Brazilians) visiting the steppes of Kazakhstan for the first time, and collapsing to their knees with overflowing tears, as though they have returned to a homeland of their dreams.
Asians, what is it like to bear along these ancestor memories of grasslands and endless steppes that constantly intrude into your mindspace?
Neo-mongoloid people (flat faced, slant eyed, ching chong looking folks) actually evolved in the forests and tundra of Siberia, not the steppes
WAT WEN WONG?
SUM TIN WONG?
Feels pretty good
Why doesn't history remember his actual life, in which Che was a fairly unintelligent brute who was terminally incompetent and couldn't do a single goddamn simple thing right?
>>2259597
You forgot terrorist and murderer
>>2259597
Cause he was handsome and stupid hippies wanted to get in his pants.
I know how ridiculous the title looks but how does one really stops being impulsive and in general really using his brain. And can you overwhelm yourself if you think too much/read too much?
Stop masturbating. After 3 weeks you brain will feel much sharper like you're on NZT
>>2259672
Is this true? This can't be true. Is this true?
>>2259684
I'm wondering that myself.
Was the Wirtschaftswunder a meme?
I don't know whose authority to trust, were they just a bunch of blundering idiots who didn't do shit/sweep everything under the rug/not employ anybody, or did they virtually eliminate unemployment?
What was the German economy like?
>>2259519
you mean after WW2?
>>2259727
prior
>>2259519
>did they virtually eliminate unemployment?
>blundering idiots who didn't do shit/sweep everything under the rug/not employ anybody
These two are not mutualy exclusive. They eliminated unemployment by eliminating people from workforce.
What do most seem to misunderstand about him?
>>2259430
That we really know anything about him. Plutarch and Arrian might be decent historians (or, well, Plutarch was a decent storyteller), but they wrote so many centuries after he lived that he is shrouded in uncertainty
>>2259444
And what of the men of letters, scribes, etc. whom he surrounded himself with? I feel like that would've allowed us more insight into him.
was he really a great commander or it was because Darius was a moron?
Are ancient Greeks and Byzantine Greeks the same people?
>>2259419
I am Greek
>>2259422
Wow. That's amazing.
>>2259422
Sorry to hear that