Where did the US get it's idea of the electoral college? Was it the HRE?
The desire to put as many checks & balances on potential abuses of power even by the people themselves. The founding fathers took the responsibility of self government more seriously than modern American who take universal suffrage for granted
>>2279804
I understand why, but where did they derive it from? What was their model?
>>2279814
I think it was an invention of their own to ensure equality between the states, but don't quote me on that. What I can tell you for sure is that they looked to the HRE as a model of what the US shouldn't be, and argued that America would become as useless as it was if they didn't have a strong executive branch.
Will english become the official language of the world in the future?
>>2279760
no, Esperanto will
American already is the official language of the world
Most people in history probably lived and died within a 10 kilometer radius, what are some exceptions?
Favorite example would have to be Edward Day Cohota, Chinese guy who managed to find his way into the battlefields of the American Civil War. Also Ibn Battuta, who managed to travel everywhere between North Africa and China
>>2279706
Johann Schiltberger, born 1380 near Munich, went on a crusade, fought at the battle of Nicopolis, became a slave of the Turks, later fought as a Turkish soldier at the battle of Ankara, was taken prisoner by Timur, rode with Timur into Persia and India as a soldier, was made a gift to a Khan from the Golden Horde, traveled Siberia with the GH and then miraculously made it back home to Bavaria after 30 years of slavery.
He wrote a book about his experiences, and the countries he traveled. Pretty fucking awesome.
Aleksandar Lekso Saičić
The Samurai fear the Serbs
>>2279706
Yang Kyoungjong
He first had to fight for the Japanese, then got captured by the Russians and got put into the Red Army, then got captured by the Germans and got put into Wehrmacht, and then got captured by the Americans.
Okay so I have no idea where to post this question so I figure I'll just ask you guys.
Is money a good example of yin and yang? Money implies freedom but it also implies commitment to a place (for the most part) you dont want to be.
Do you guys think we NEED money to truly be free to do what we desire?
Feel free to call me a retard or whatever,
>>2279679
You are a retard, or whatever.
>>2279683
thx
>>2279688
Any time.
did they leave the book of revelation in by accident?
The New Testament is pretty silly, if you think about it. It's padded a ton and has the same story told four times in a row, then Acts, then a bunch of loosely connected letters, then an acid trip about a red dragon and a seven-eyed lamb and God riding a horse across the land and slaying people with His sword-tongue.
It's like they didn't know how to end it, so they went for the hypest shit imaginable.
>>2281105
>has the same story told four times in a row
serious question for those who have read the bible, can i just read matthew then move on to the other books or do i really need to read the same thing 4 times?
>>2281109
Reading it 4 times really fucking helps, BECAUSE they don't coordinate very well. It depends on your goals for reading the bible.
How come the bombing of Tokyo is relatively unknown when it was arguably the most destructive bombing raid in history?
It was overshadowed by the more flashy and trendy atomic bombings of hiroshima and Nagasaki
>>2279572
Because Japan lost, and because of the shock value of nukes. Dropping one bomb that obliterates a city leaves a stronger psychological impact than firebombing a city to ashes.
If firebombing is used to destroy a nations capability to war, as they did, what use does a nuke have?
>here we go again.
Was this the most important battle of the middle ages?
>>2279513
define middle ages
>>2279516
> define middle ages
Don't be a pseudo
>>2279513
no seriously, what time period are you looking at here, the Middle Ages has 437294734 different interpretations of what time period it represents.
germany didnt start wwi ok
correct
yep
>>2279376
really sautés the old noodle
Relative to when it existed, what's the most militarily powerful fuel country to ever exist?
>>2279360
Prussia, AKA Germanized Slavs.
Distilled autism.
>>2279360
If you consider independent city states countries than Sparta.
USA in the decade from 1991 to 2001.
>major rival [Collapses]
>US led military alliance expands
>future competitors don't have the sophisticated manufacturing base they will eventually have.
>no major military escapades that drag out for too long to reveal deficiencies in US doctrine.
Prove me wrong
Why did world war 2 happen? Why did Britain, USA and others declare war on Germany?
If it was because Germany invaded a lot of countries, then why didn't the attack the soviets, given that the soviets also did the same?
world war 2, ww2, world war ii
inb4 le tags are autistic
>>2278969
Germany not only invaded a lot of places, they openly violated numerous treaties they signed in recent memory, showing that any attempt to deal with them through soft power was futile.
The Soviets more or less kept their word and didn't pursue brinksmanship games the way the Nazis did.
>>2278969
There were numerous parties who wanted to attack the Soviet Union in 1939, plans were laid up for a bombing run on Baku
But nobody wanted a Moscow-Berlin Axis
Also Germany declared war on the USA, not the other way around
Think you've been on /pol/ too long mate
>>2278993
should I be autistic here?
I think I will
>Also Germany declared war on the USA
true
>not the other way around
false
is it the greatest achievement in Black civilization?
>>2278921
Absolutely. Only black masterminds are capable of not only constructing to such marbles of civilization, but sharing their knowledge with the white man - who in turn stabbed them in the back.
>>2278921
No, Wu-Tang Clan is
Benito Mussolini was in my dream last night. What does this mean?
>>2278903
That you like it rough from middle aged men.
>>2278903
That you're a fascist now. It's ok, anon. I don't mind.
>>2278903
That you spend too much time on /his/.
>tfw you realize that the west would be a literal utopia right now if it weren't for some autistic serb
>>2278813
history is macroscopically determinist
>>2278817
Elaborate
>>2278813
Your wojak is not realistic.
Why there aren't more politicians going full Erdogan on their countries (basically taking over as dictator)?
It is clear that a large percentage of leading politicians are sociopaths or narcissists who would love to have absolute power. I also think that even in many democratic countries you could go from head of govt to dictator. Maybe not in the USA due to muh right to bare arms, but I doubt the people in many European countries or somewhere like Mexico would be able to rise up and overthrow you, with all the weapons and surveilance technology states have nowdays.
Don't get me wrong I know taking over as dictator would have a lot of negative consequences for the country (mainly economic). But we all know most leaders care much more about their own power and wealth.
So in short, I find it really bizarre that almost all elected leaders just accept their defeat or term limit and give away their power peacefully, and we see practically no one just say "lol fuck the elections I have an army", or, like Erdogan do a bunch of shady shit to give himself total power.
Because eventually the people will resist. A dictatorship is used prompted by war, class conflict, economic breakdown etc. It's incredibly draining in all areas from economics to mentality, and is much harder to maintain than most people realise.
>>2278586
Erdogan has been enjoying a continuously high level of popular support that is exceptional. Only Putin and Merkel seem to have enjoyed the same degree of popular support and Putin behaves pretty much the same way as Erdogan. As for Merkel she has a strong personal taste for collegial rule.
>>2278586
It is extremely difficult to overcome systems that are set in place and have long history. It is exceedingly difficult for any politician to take over because simply the people around with a desire for power won't let him. If democracy becomes a dictatorship most of the influentials in the government lose their position of power. Not to mention unless your military is ready to unleash its might on a civilian populace you don't need to start shooting to take down a government. Now I do believe alot militaries are willing to shoot civilians but many of the ones that haven't been expected to for a long time will have trouble. Also when you have democracy for a long enough period of time you have idealists at every level of the government and their is nothing to do with these people except elimination which can be exceedingly difficult.
What does /his/ think of Corporatism?
Reminder: Corporatism =! Corporatocracy.
Fascists like it.
It preaches conciliation but long term that will always buckle.
Basically fascism
We love fascism