ITT: Good guys who should've won but lost in the end
The Romans got their shit kicked in for the whole war, and won anyway. After all the great battles he fought he deserved to come home victorious. RIP Hannibaby
Joseph Chamberlain. He would have prevented WW1.
>mentions an old kingdom/state/area that's not around any more
>doesn't say what the present day area is
>>2320578
What's the problem with that? There isn't a one-to-one correspondence or continuity between most historical entities and modern ones.
>>2320607
Even if there's isn't I'd still like to know the area.
>>2320642
Then ask or look it up. It's a very basic thing but delineating the exact borders at some exact time is more complex.
What are some good, non meme books about Jefferson and his presidency? I'm open to documentaries too but books are preferred.
Hitchens' autobiography of Jefferson is great.
>>2320580
Correction, biography.
The classic.
What was his problem?
>>2320548
catholics
royalists
>>2320548
He was a Jew.
>>2320548
He suffered from Christardation.
What the fuck was his problem? Has any leader every hated their own country as aggressively as Gorbachev has? The only one that I think comes close is Yeltsin.
>>2320509
>ends the Cold War peacefully
>the bastard
>literally saves the world
>hurr durr what was his problem
>>2320509
He was too stupid and weak for perestroyka, better Andropov live more
Was Ataturk a dictator
Yes.
>>2320503
Yeah.
Does that change anything?
>>2320510
Isn't it hypocritical that a man who preached democracy become a dictator
I want to learn more about The Holy Roman empire, any books or websites you recommend me to read/wisit? Also I would like a source for historical maps, they don't have to be modern made, I would glady look at the old german ones.
>>2320453
>>2320453
>>2320537
These maps are so much more beautiful than women.
If history is written by the victor then how do we know it is not entirely falsified?
>>2320394
>it is not
History isn't written by the victor, that's a stupid meme
>>2320394
Your power level is rising young frogger but the true redpill is that nothing can be indisputably proven even if there is "proof"
The only real evidence we have of past events is the present
Thought is the though of thought
evidence is the evidence of evidence
Time itself is a meme all that we can be sure of is the present and we can reasonably expect that there more of the present later, but not forever
What names no longer exist in Germany because of WW2? Can't imagine there's many Adolfs for example.
>>2320228
Adolf was a popular name not only in Germany, but also in other countries that were historically a part of the Germanosphere, like Czechoslovakia, Hungary or Poland. It completely vanished after WW2.
>>2320233
Adolfo is still common in spanish speaking counties, at least in latin america.
>>2320233
>Poland
Can confirm. Had an elderly uncle (born in 1910s) named Adolf. The name completely vanished by now.
Ned Lud dindu nuthin 1 loom = 1 job stolen from a good purehearted tailor
>>2320550
can't wait for self driving cars to become a thing
Did he really hate Jews?
he just bitched about them taking over hollywood
>>2320047
They founded Hollywood though
Every major studio was started by Jews
>>2320103
>Literally posting in a thread about Walt Disney's supposedly anti-semitism
>D I S N E Y
>Can't think of any MAJOR FILM STUDIOS that were started by none Jews
>In a thread about D I S N E Y
>The commercialized mass press expanded the public sphere, but its political character was lost because of commercial, consumer attitude. Critical publicity is supplanted by manipulative publicity.
>Today, conversation is administered, rational debate has changed into a production number for radio and television stars, a saleable package ready for the box office. The public sphere assumes advertising functions.
>Journalistic principles have weakened, the culture-consuming public (from the cultural public sphere) have attained dominance at the expense of the political public sphere. Competition between organizied private interests invaded the public sphere.
Written in 1962. He saw it coming.
>>2320016
Habermas also fully understood how the internet worked. He argued in 2008 when everyone else was hyping how internet and social media in particular would make people more politically aware, that it actually causes a differentiation of the public sphere into smaller sub-spheres that are only marginally connected to the public strings of debate, thus undermining the public discourse and not contributing to it, perfectly predicting the concept of echo-chamber before it had fully manifested as we see it today.
>>2320565
Echo-chambers are a myth.
>>2320565
>a person who has been exposed to all sides and arguments sooner or later takes a position
>several people like this exist
>they go to the same website because they already passed the debate stage - now they want to relax with like-minded people
>some younglin' comes to their "echo-chamber" and regurgitates the talking point they have heard and debunked numerous times
>the people in the "echo-chamber" roll their eyes and make fun of him
>the younglin' leaves frustrated as he couldn't change anyone's opinion and asserts that the echo-chamber ignores facts and that echo-chambers are a problem
I didn't study any philosophy or history (or literature) in college. I studied comp sci. I feel quite stupid and uncultured and I'm wondering if its too late for me. Is it enough to just read books? And if so, what books do I read. I feel like I have missed out on my last chance at learning these things properly as I will never be given essays to write and have them critiqued and I will have no set outline of what I should be studying.
>>2319987
Reading only will only ever give you a cursory understanding you talk with fellows to actually be able to get anywhere.
just read the Bible
>>2319987
I learned more about philosophy outside of school than in school, and I took a lot of philosophy courses. read up on phenomenology.
Is this true?
>inb4 hurr durr fake news
>>2319925
>researchers
Googling something sure takes alot of effort
What is truth?
Why does almost everyone in the world either advocate for some form of capitalism or some form of socialism? Surely those two systems are only a small fraction of the possible economic systems that humans could structure themselves in. I can understand that those two systems are discussed a lot because much of the world lives in those two systems. However, I don't see why that would stop people from coming up with alternative systems to advocate, or even stop people from advocating older systems such as feudalism.
distributism ftw
>>2319843
Well just curious what other systems would you propose
Neo feudalism where? Russia?