>believes in a standing, national army
>pro-centralization, federal government's power should supersede that of that states
>federal government should establish a national debt
>president should be elected for life
>ruiling classes should be given permanent stake in national government
>constitution can be followed or ignored as needed
>adopts an aggressively pro-British foreign and trading policy
>high tariffs
>tells France to go fuck itself because "muh angry mobs"
>uses Louis XVI's beheading as excuse to justify defaulting on debts owed to France
>anti-slavery
>pro-Jewish
If he agreed with the British 100% of the time, why did he even join the American revolution?
>>2346634
What does 'pro-Jewish' mean in this context and why is it as important as stuff like ignoring and heeding the constitution?
>>2346634
james madison SUCK MY DICK
>>2346698
He grew up in a colony with a sizable Jewish population, where he gained his love of merchant living and anti-antisemitism. He also studied Hebrew, and was that one killjoy who'd reprimand his fellow Christians for mocking Jews.
He admiration pales compared to the U.K. however, who allowed Israelis to bomb their military bases back in the late '40s, and responded with a series of apologies.
if people back then thought tomatoes would kill you then why did they grow them
and also don't you think somebody would have manned up and realizes tomatoes are safe to eat
i feel like maybe back then "tomatoes will kill you" was a medieval meme not meant to be taken seriously but historians don't think people back then had a sense of humor
I have literally never heard of whatever it is you're talking about
Post someone who talks about this "dangerous tomato" thing
Tomatoes have trace amounts of cyanide.
>>2346640
Tomatoes aren't native to Europe, when they were first brought back over from the new world people were afraid to eat them
Which battle had the greatest technological disparity between the belligerents?
KOT
O
T
>>2346573
Can´t tell, first thing that comes to mind is the Boxer Rebellion, and or colonial expansionism
>>2346598
This is a good answer. Where the Europeans brought gunpowder and steel, the natives had rocks, bone, and sinew.
What does /his/ know/think about Queen Victoria?
I'm new here btw, just testing the waters.
>>2346566
got praised for the work of her predecessors
Okay Vicky
Fat womanlet
Why haven't you read the greatest book ever written?
Because I haven't found a store in my area that sells The Years Of Rice And Salt.
>>2346525
Here you go, friend:
http://libgen.io/foreignfiction/get.php?md5=990a639539fdc46fd4b48c3d8d171962&key=4F75R925VVHOVZ7F
Because I already know about jews.
>Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's
What did he mean by this?
Don't be a reactionary that overthrows the government every time something against God is done. Obey the laws, and govern yourself into being a good person.
If an aristocrat demands taxes and you don't have enough money to give, let him rape your wife in front of you
>>2346523
ROMAN'D
>tfw people only remember we exist when they want to criticize U.S. foreign policy, and they do so by completely denying our agency and only portraying us as unwitting puppets on American strings
Why is South America so irrelevant?
Look at a map of places on earth that the Spanish have governed.
Now ask yourself, "are any of these places well run?"
>they even got Florida
>>2346482
>Now ask yourself, "are any of these places well run?"
Yes, Chile.
>>2346478
It is even funnier when you find out that South America has the 9th biggest economy in the world and yet nobody gives a shit.
Do you think the wage elasticity of non-productive, pecuniary occupations is inherently higher in proportion to the employment elasticity than the relative proportions for productive occupations?
I don't know
Could you repeat the question?
I'd suspect it would be lower, being that non-productive work is really fucking easy.
*Blocks your path*
>>2346370
*stares*
*unzips mouse*
I know drunk posting is pretty gay b ut here we go.
Let's be philosophic since /his/ is the only board where philsophy has a platform:
I have a theory that, similar to how our human brain can't 'come up' with a new color, we can neither come up with a method for something to be created without a creator.
It's so thickly inbreded in our brains that a baby MUST have a father and mother, some kind of creator.
Same thing with the universe, it must have a creator. Us humans can't possible think of a way in which something is formed without a creator.
I hope I'm making sense, vodka really fucks with you.
>:D
What?
>>2346176
Yeah I get what you are saying and its true. All matter in the universe was always there in some form and doesn't have a beginning. Its just beyond human comprehension that something doesn't have to "begin"
>6 cans of molsen and a bunch of weed ;)
>>2346176
>Us humans can't possible think of a way in which something is formed without a creator.
But they did you dunce
What about Christianity made it so wildly successful? Are the ideas of selflessness, sacrifice, and overcoming death the ones most compelling to mankind?
>>2346013
>>2346013
Well firstly it was cheap. In order to join the cult of mitbras or Isis you had to pay an arm and a leg.
xstianity was completely fucking gratis
Why is prehistory so much more interesting compared to non prehistory?
>non prehistory
Kek.
Because the finno Korean Hyper War was an affair never to forget.
>>2345969
It isn't though.
Claudius or Trajan for me.
>>2345939
Aurelian hands down. RESTITUTOR ORBIS
>>2345939
The one who competed with prostitutes about how much dick he sucked and how much he earned from his "labor"
>Jericho was founded in 9600 BC
Do people actually believe this bullshit?
>>2345915
In the sense there was a continuous habitation of the site since then, yes
>>2345994
This. There are usually like 7 layers of ruins underneath those places
>>2345994
That's retarded
Did he actually do anything?
>>2345713
Yes, as he was a physicist, but like many paradigm-shifting theories he's not solely deserving of credit and is CERTAINLY not deserving the meme status of "history's greatest mind" which he seems to have achieved.
Einstein was a lot more photogenic and politically visible than Von Neumann, that's all.
>>2345713
Photoelectric effect. Postulated photon particles. Some more minor stuff, like his papers about Brownian motion. While he didn't personally originate 95% of what we consider relativity, he still played a very important role and it would be stupid to deny it.
Einstein is in league for the most overrated man in history, but that doesn't mean he dindu nuffin, far from it.
>If the dismissal of Jewish scientists means the annihilation of contemporary German science then we shall do without science for a few years.
Adolf Hitler on Einstein